Not 1967 Israel border!

by YankeeJim | May 19, 2011 at 01:38 pm
240 views | 14 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Israel | Photo 09

Israel | Photo 09

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

Fox News indicated that Obama said explicitly that Israel must return to the 1967 borders. That is not the case. What he said was that there must be some land swapping as part of the negotiations.

The most hotly contested areas include Jerusalem and land along the West Bank and Golan Heights that were taken in 1967. The land was won in battle because Israel would otherwise be defenseless in those areas as the former border left Israel only 8 miles wide. Now, it is 45 miles wide in those parts.

So, what must be done?

Looking at the map, reasonable parties might conclude that 1) Palestine cannot be in pieces; it must be a contiguous boundary. 2) Palestine must not be an enclave. 3) Jerusalem must be an international city with a security contract with Israel. 4) Israel and Palestine must negotiate land swaps to accomplish these things.

What am I missing? What don’t I understand?

Where is Hillary Clinton in this discussion?


“Obama prods Mideast allies to embrace reform, make peace

By Scott Wilson, Updated: Thursday, May 19, 2:57 PM

President Obama used an address Thursday on the tumult in the Middle East and North Africa to increase pressure on American allies in the region, including Israel, to carry out lasting political reform and make peace with old enemies.

Speaking to diplomats in the State Department’s ornate Benjamin Franklin Room, Obama attempted to advance his project of bringing U.S. policy in line with his stated values of democratic reform and respect for human rights, acknowledging that “our friends in the region have not all reacted to the demands for change consistent” with those principles.

Obama made clear he was referring to Yemen and Bahrain, but his speech omitted any mention of the oil-rich kingdom of Saudi Arabia, an American ally that has helped neighboring Bahrain crack down on its anti-government demonstrations.

Obama used one of the longest sections of his speech to urge Israel, in unusually frank terms, to negotiate a final peace agreement with the Palestinians.

For the first time, Obama cited Israel’s boundaries on the eve of the June 1967 Arab-Israeli war as the basis for negotiation over final borders, saying that a “full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces” from the West Bank should be carried out in coordination with Palestinian security forces.

The formulation goes beyond principles outlined by President George W. Bush, who stated during his term that “it is unrealistic to expect” Israel to pull back to the 1967 lines. Obama said the negotiations over final borders, which he indicated may include land swaps to accommodate Israel’s large settlement blocs, should result in “a viable Palestine, a secure Israel.”

Obama acknowledged that the conflict’s most emotional questions — the division of Jerusalem, which both Israelis and Palestinians claim as their capital, and the right of Palestinian refugees or their descendants to return to homes inside Israel — would still need to be resolved. But he said moving forward now on the border and security aspects would provide a foundation for resolving the two “wrenching and emotional issues” in a “just and fair” manner.

By doing so, Obama essentially embraced the middle ground between two camps within his national security team, which for months have debated how far he should go in spelling out his plan for an Israeli-Palestinian peace.

To reassure Israelis, Obama pledged an “unshakable” commitment to Israel’s security and called any future Palestinian state “non-militarized,” something Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has demanded. Netanyahu is set to visit Obama on Friday at the White House.

“Precisely because of our friendship, it is important that we tell the truth: the status quo is unsustainable, and Israel must act boldly to advance a lasting peace,” Obama said. “The dream of a Jewish and democratic state cannot be fulfilled with permanent occupation.”

The 45-minute speech was Obama’s first attempt to define the U.S. interest in the political changes taking place across the Middle East and North Africa, driven by a series of anti-government upheavals unfolding differently in countries from Libya through the Persian Gulf states.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
3
Karen Hatter

Jim, why are you surprised? You know the FOX Channel only hears what it wants to hear and if they DON'T hear it, they'll MAKE IT UP!

One point that seems to be missed is the glaring hole and out that President Obama left for those negotiating for Israel to walk away from any alleged talks, the declaration that Hamas and others agree to and proclaim Israel's right to exist, a position one will be hard pressed to believe would be adopted by Hamas.

Former Governor Mitt Romney's assertion that the President's statement somehow threw Israel under the bus was ridiculous.  

0
YankeeJim

"The president said a “full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces” from the West Bank should be carried out in coordination with Palestinian security forces. He described a future Palestinian state as “nonmilitarized,” a key Israeli demand."

2
nanute

Jim, What are you missing? Probably the same thing that BiBi is missing: If the Israelis don't reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians, the UN will grant Palestine a membership, thereby making Palestine a defacto state. President Obama realizes this, and is trying to get the Israelis to see the light.

1
YankeeJim

That is a big oversight. Watch out for the bus!

2
The 1

I agree with President Obama. Israeli has been taking advantage of it's cozy relationship with the U.S. to push it's issues without regard for any Palestine agreement. They both need to stop the political positioning tactics, pull their heads out of their asses, and make peace.

Gingrich and Romney are a_holes for making political statements like that about it. Neither will be President. They are both as stupid as that idiot Joe Wilson when he called President Obama 'a liar'.

0
YankeeJim

"During President Obama's major health care speech on Wednesday, South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson (R) yelled out "You lie!" when the President said the legislation would not mandate coverage for undocumented immigrants."

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

cexline
First Flagged at 4:07 PM, May 19, 2011 by cexline
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (14)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from