NP Rank:
Nothing to fear from TSA full body scanners
A Washington Post journalist has given the details of what precisely the proposed TSA airport security full body scanners will entail, and shows that the public has nothing to fear from this heightened security measure.
Images are viewed by objective scanners removed from the area, and are immediately deleted, says the report. They are vague and fuzzy, and look only for shapes of hidden devices on the person being scanned.
EVER SINCE UMAR Farouk Abdulmutallab allegedly tried to blow up Northwest Flight 253 with explosives in his underwear, a debate has begun anew over the use and usefulness of full-body scanning technology that would have detected his secret cargo. The privacy concerns raised by these machines are understandable. But the precautions taken at every step to guard passenger privacy should allay any fears.There are two kinds of "full-body" scanners in use by the Transportation Security Administration, the millimeter wave and the backscatter. Passengers using the millimeter-wave machines spend up to 40 seconds having their bodies scanned. The image produced is three-dimensional and looks like a fuzzy negative. Facial features are blurred. But the shape and contour of one's body are easily made out as the radio waves bounce off skin to create an image that allows screeners to check for concealed material that might be under clothing.
The TSA has ordered 150 backscatter scanners. . . .



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 06:52 on January 7th, 2010
Low radiation doses, shouldnt be feared considering you would probably absorb more at 11:am in the hot sun
at 07:15 on January 7th, 2010
And now the bad news: the scanners don't work nearly as well as the TSA would have you believe, and this from a guy who used to make them.