Now They've Weaponized Digital TV -- Or So It Seems

The U.S. government has weaponized the telecommunications system, apparently using the new digital TV specs as a mechanism to deliver high-tech harassment and torture and that's not news?

And, as my other stories indicate, sonic torture is mild compared to what else they appear to be delivering via telecommunications.

Mike, if the wrench is really from you and isn't another "spoofed page" inserted by those who'd like to censor the truth about the weaponization of the telecommunications system, maybe I should go venue shopping. 

Where can I make a donation to your tinfoil fund?

While this story seems plausible to me, the last fifteen years of my  life have conditioned me to accept things that (almost certainly) on  any other path of life that I may have traversed, I would not have  accepted .....   Nonetheless, I must admit I chuckled a little bit  (sorry) as I read the  story.  Our world has become, for lack of a  better word, ridiculous. 

"But this technology is real ... it is being deployed" ...  often using  "taken-for-granted" technologies that are (in the view of the  average person) completely benign. It is the systemic treachery  of  "hiding in plain view", and feeds on the human tendency to  forgive the familiar ("familiarity breeds contempt"). As another  example, I might  add an anecdotal story about my cell phone.  I  often take walks in  remote areas, and in the exercise of an  experiment, I have taken  my cell phone along with me and  carried  it inside a little tote,  with  the battery installed.  All  along  the journey, I then find that I  am accosted by harassers  (even in  very remote areas).  At the  end  of the trek, I reach  into  the tote  and pull out the phone.  Not  surprisingly, it is very  warm  (because it has been transmitting my  GPS coordinates).  I  have  "disabled" the GPS locator in the phone  settings section,  but of  course that doesn't really work, even if  the  little icon has  a  cross-bar through it.  (A simple hack, I  understand) 

I am sure that many "program" participants believe that they can  disable their own cell phone's GPS locator option, and feel as if  they  are "off line".  Most of them are too gullible and  unsophisticated to understand the lunacy of that idea.  Of course,  the trackers are being tracked (24/7/365) ...

Disconnecting the battery is a good idea, and I usually do just that.  For the purpose of my experiment, I installed it for the wilderness  excursion.  The RFID tag phenomenon is picking up speed ... as  you  have indicated, RFID is the next frontier in Big Brotherism ...  

 just as "spoofed" or faked pages can be inserted into an internet user's data stream to maliciously intercept or alter content.

You know, Vic, that's funny you mention that because no less than what, four?  times I have offered you a link to a free five star imaging program download whose screen capture feature would allow you to present these "spoofed" pages to web managers so you could get to the bottom of this "torture" you describe but you refuse to do so- an alleged investigative reporter who can't be bothered to investigate something which he claims threatens his life wih slow kill genocide. .

I say it's funny because yesterday when you posted about this at FFCHS forum I posted this:

If you seriously believe someone is intentionally injecting such
signals, a more serious approach will require this:
You didn't say if you were using a cable box. If you are you'll need a
second test unit for that too.
Buy or borrow a second DTV capable set and, along with the cable box,
swap them out and see if you still get this noise.
If so record this noise.Even if you can't get another TV and isolate
the cause as your own equipment, this is an easy sleuthing job. I am
assuming an investigative reporter owns a tape recorder. Upload it to
your computer or capture it and convert it to a wav. file, I think I
can get free audio analyzer programs at CNET downloads, post it up
here and we'll get to the bottom of this and see what they're doing.

Which, like the spoof pages, you ignored the offer to help or any action to stop this. (you even implied that my offer made me part of the torture matrix!)It is obvious you prefer silly milquetoast drama queening to taking action  helping anyone, including yourself, stop this. Which tells me either this sound isn't such a big deal after all or isn't happening at all, because you just sit there and let it continue. Puppy torturer!

TI's, this person's "work" is going to see us ridiculed forever. See the comments of his other articles or the ACLU blog posts:

http://blog.aclu.org/2009/01/26/internet-filters-voluntary-ok-not-government-mandate/comment-page-2/#comment-6310

So it's obvious he looks completely absurd, and doesn't care that he does as people in that comments section repeatedly said so. And we see from this and the spoofed pages that he has no intention of lifting a finger to end organized stalking.

So what does that add up to? Figure it out.

I posted a rough draft of this article on the Freedom From Convert Harassment and Stalking blog site (http://groups.google.com/group/ffchs-daily-harassment-log).  A reader had the following comment, and I replied.

When I attempted to post my reply, the post would not go through.  This typically happens when a surveillance operative thinks I'm posting something that authorities do not want published.  So I am going to attempt to publish the poster comment and my response here.  Let's see what happens...


Acads wrote:

Remote phones and wireless routers use RF frequencies It still would
require tuning and the ability to direct it at yourself if in fact
these things are being piggy backed and utilized. In either case if
these are being used how could this be accomplished without a
microchip to receive the signals and know where to direct the sound.
If five people were in the room my guess is you would be the only one
detecting the sounds.

Based on these posts and the similar types of attacks being
experienced on or about the same time by more than one individual, it
would seem that this is being used as a training or experimental
mechanism. Otherwise why would multiple people be experiencing the
same attack in completely different locations. What would be the
purpose of coordinating to that level. I personally think that this as
much as anything else points to a single command and control point.

scrivener replied:

Acads:  In the case of the digital TV bat sounds, that audio was definitely coming from the TV and was not V2K or microwave.  The attack emanated from the TV itself, with the entry point most likely the cable box.  Digital technology allows the box, whether a cable box or a set-top box, to be "addressed" remotely, wirelessly, according to my understanding of the digital TV (ATSC) specs.  (Remember that even set-top over-the-air digital boxes are scanned, or addressed, remotely.  It doesn't take much for a high-tech operation to replace one digital stream with another.)

However, I have been hit by piercing audio blasts localized to one ear, usually the right ear, and I am certain these are microwave hits and not traditional pushed-air audio that could be heard by others. 

Your assumption that these are simultaneous attacks, part of an experiment, is not borne out by my experience at all.  These are precisely targeted attacks, and this is no experiment, because it has been going on for years, and it works perfectly (and horrificly) each time.

As for targeting, here's my theory:  transponders may have been installed on premises that transmit precise coordinates.  Perhaps they've got the house covered in an electronic grid, like in "The Matrix," and they've got a constant read on my location. 

Or, perhaps, they've got some sort of through the wall radar on me 24/7 that transmits my precise location (actually, that would be similar to an electronic grid.)

Or maybe when I was persuaded to have an EEG more than five years ago, just as all this began, the diodes that were pasted onto my skull had a subcutaneous element that remained in my skin.  Or maybe I was chipped during a blood test, when the tech made inappropriate remarks and held her thumb down on the needle as she removed it, and I could feel a lump in my arm in the area of the injection. 

Or perhaps they've got me in a radar grid AND they've chipped me.

Whatever it is, they've definitely have the ability to triangulate coordinates within millimeters of the target area -- I am convinced of that.  If the military can triangulate on an incoming missile amidst the vastness of space, it's reasonable to assume that they can easily triangulate a relatively sedentary target on Earth.

NOTE: I tried again to post my reply to "acads" at the ffchs blog site.  Again it would not post.  Could some reader here please post it to the digital TV thread?

http://groups.google.com/group/ffchs-daily-harassment-log/browse_thread/thread/c02bf144f6c1dffd

*They* are tailoring their attacks to your actual or perceived environment.

These weapons are a few hundred meters or less, secreted within buildings or vans. These mobile weapons can follow on highways or other.

These weapons will be installed in the locations that you will be expected to frequent.

"No way this is all "point and shoot." Some is, but it would take  legions  to ... "  [[[[]]]]  I am in absolute agreement with that  statement, as the empirically collected information that I have  gleaned induces me  to believe that most "program" members are  directed via centralized tracking & surveillance apparatus ...  right  down to the  millimeter. Additionally, I believe that the  "individualized" stuff is used in a spare way, to "fill in the holes".  My guess is that they  have some over-arching method that  enables the coverage of large  areas ... this stuff will be a "slam  dunk" for us when the totalitarians make it all official.  We should all  be heading for the countryside while we still can ...

My du jour theory is that GPS-enabled tracking is a pointer mechanism for the "over arching" surveillance methods that they employ.

Vic has suggested the existence of a laser based surveillance  "matrix".  (OK, the laser part is my addition). About fifteen years  ago, my wife and I were accustomed to going into the dark-sky  wilderness for star gazing.  We usually took with us a ["1.05 &  .532" micron combination] star-pointer laser. These things have a  range of several miles. On one such adventure, we parked along  a lonely road and got  out of the vehicle to take in the view.  We  discovered that we  were not entirely alone, as there was a largish  house, perhaps  75  yards off of the road, and hidden by massive trees.  At the  exact same instant that I pressed the  button on the laser, a  popping sound emanated from the direction  of the home (we  were not  aiming it at the home). It was a sound that I recognized  from my days working with electrical  contractors -- the sound of  an explosive-charged circuit breaker  "popping off" under  overload conditions. I thought it was a   strange thing, and so I went back a few nights  later (alone) and  performed the same experiment.  Again,  emanating from the  direction of the house, was the popping  sound of a high power  circuit breaker.  There were no power  poles in the area, so that  could not explain the sound. (Some  power poles do have such  things attached).  To this day I do not  understand the correlation  between the laser and the  breaker-sound.   

Minor correction:  the long wavelength is 1.064 (second harmonic)

Correction to correction: 532 is the second harmonic.  :-)

Was the high current overload (assuming that is what it was),  caused by some kind of feedback resulting from the use of high  powered  (and weirdly free space heterodyned) lasers? It has a  feel for the beginnings of a new sci-fi novel - maybe I'll start  writing it.   What if many giga-watts of invisible laser energy,  (1.064 micron energy is invisible) blasted into the environment,  could cause a heterodyne effect in the brains of human beings,  making the targets artificially telepathic?  Then each of us would  require just one tracker.  Cheap for them.

Yeah ... I did say that my comments were in the realm of science  fiction ... and as far as the "circuit breaker" theory goes, I may have  misinterpreted what was really someone shooting at strangers in  the dark.  I don't know ... I'm just throw'in it out there ...  What else  do we have to work with?

We have two main areas of concern, each of which is somewhat  separate and distinct, but engaged in a dependency relationship.  We are concerned with the (a) tracking and the (b) surveillance.  The first (a) is necessary for the second (b).  The second (b) may  enhance the first (a).  We think that the primary facilitators of  both (a) and (b) are centralized, and not driven very much at the  "program participant" level.  Sure, the participants provide  feedback, but it is secondary, and mostly used to collect  street  theatre reaction metrics.  We have a pretty good feel for the  mechanisms behind (a), and we think that we can point a finger  at  GPS-enabled technology for much of that.  This leaves (b) as  the least understood mechanism, and in the face of "less  understood" comes wild speculation.  Hence, my posts.  Wild  speculation sometimes leads to results.