Oakland Riots lead to at Least 100 Arrests After BART Shooting

by Rob Walker | January 8, 2009 at 11:27 am
1441 views | 32 Recommendations | 31 comments

Photos

Bart oakland riots aftermath

Bart oakland riots aftermath

see larger image

uploaded by wojophoto

Rioting broke out in Oakland on Wednesday night as protests over the shooting death of Oscar Grant spilled into the streets, bringing out hundreds of police and a large amount of damage in the city.

Over a hundred people were arrested last night in Oakland after the riots, and police were still investigating numerous reports of violence and damage to property, including a number of cars that were torched.

The riots came after a spokesman from BART spoke to protesters about the shooting death of Oscar Grant, who was shot while lying on his stomach under the care of BART officers.

About a dozen of the protesters then began smashing windows of nearby businesses and cars, including several city of Oakland vehicles parked near 17th Street and on San Pablo Avenue, just north of Frank H. Ogawa Plaza.

Numerous videos have been released onto the internet showing the scuffle between a number of young men at the BART station, as well as Oscar Grant being held down by police and eventually shot in the back while lying on his stomach.

The incident was captured by at least four cellphone cameras held by passengers on a train idling next to the platform. The videos, which have been widely broadcast and streamed online, show Mr. Grant lying face down when Mr. Mehserle, 27, pulls his gun and fires a single shot. Mr. Mehserle looks stunned for a moment, and then handcuffs Mr. Grant with the assistance of another officer.
The New Year's Day shooting death of Oscar Grant on an Oakland BART platform has been electronically re-enacted hundreds of thousands of times as videos of the incident are broadcast on television and spread over the Internet.

At the urging of Oakland's mayor, Ron Dellums, the Oakland Police Deparment may soon be involved in the investigation of the shooting. While BART has jurisdiction in this case, the resignation of the officer involved caused doubt in the process by many people in the area.

Mayor Ron Dellums urged residents to remain calm after protests turned violent in the fatal shooting of an unarmed black man by a transit police officer.
The Oakland Police Department may soon get involved in the investigation of the shooting death of a Hayward man by a BART Police officer on New Year's Day.

Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums is asking Oakland officers to launch a criminal investigation of the shooting that left Oscar Grant dead.  The Bay Area Rapid Transit police had been looking into the shooting along with the Alameda County District Attorney's office.

"(The mayor's) sense was late yesterday that people have really lost confidence in the process," Oakland spokeswoman Karen Boyd said.  The statement followed reports that the mayor had told people at a Wednesday night rally that he had ordered the launching of a homicide probe.

Member Stories

NP'er Duo was the first to report on Oscar Grant's shooting, and included links to video and eyewitness reports:

THE YEAR 2009 STARTED WITH A BANG that ended the life of 22-year-old African American man in the California Bay Area.  Oscar Grant’s shooting death was captured on the video footage below

NowPublic member TheCameraObscura posted about the videos being released online yesterday and gave details on the shooting:

Two videos showing a Bay Area Rapid Transit police officer fatally shooting an unarmed, cooperating 22-year-old man have surfaced, thanks to a vigilant teen and an anonymous cameraman. In the video, the apparent shooting happens towards the end of the tape.
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Capt. Tim

This was reported to be a photographer for channel 7. He may have been a cameraman though. He was attacked earlier in the evening by rioters in oakland.

Capt. Tim has contributed a photo to this story.

2
eastvanray

I will never understand the mentality of the rioter.  Why do they damage private property that has no connection to the reason that they are rioting?  I hope the police give them a good beat down!

6
rawpaint

@ eastvanray,

Rioting is hardly rational behavior. In this instance it is an outpouring of frustration that has been building up in the community (black and youth of all races) for a long time and has a history going back to the 60s. (google Oakland, black panthers, "peace movement", FSM, etc.) 

The question is why is it that a man in uniform, basically a security guard hired by a transit authority granted the legal right to bare and use a side arm, can murder a subdued and unarmed young man and NOT be held by Oakland police pending further investigation? How can you expect citizens to obey laws when those who are paid to enforce them are not accountable to the same laws? If a citizen had done this to another citizen (not to mention an officer) he would be under arrest. Period! Again, the frustration behind this originates over a long period of time. It isn't that arson and vandalism are excusable but it can certainly be understood when the voice of the people regarding inequality of police protection, application of the law and police brutality has consistently been ignored by civil authority for so long. 

3
eastvanray

Apologist.  You are doing law abiding people a grave disservice when you justify these actions.  This is not understandable.  All people must take responsibility for their actions.  What ever happened to "two wrongs do not make a right"?  Or does that not apply if you are other than white and middle class?

The response has NOTHING to do with the cause.  What other acts would you accept as being "understandable"?  Would you be so accepting if they came into your family home and "rioted"?  I agree that the actions underlying this riot were wrong but rioting does not make me sympathic to their cause. 

I hope these protestors get some jail time and some much deserved affection from their similarly-lawless, sex-starved cellmates.

5
rawpaint

Ooooh --  Mr. Nasty. I wasn't apologizing for or justifying anything. I said I "understand" it and I do. If you lived here, maybe you would too. If you watched the news reports you might even see some people whose cars were vandalized who said they "understand" the protestors, however much they disagree with the vandalism. In any case why make this personal? Makes me want an ignore feature on NowPublic. Anyone who would wish sexual predation on someone regardless of their behavior obviously has a problem.

9
amyjudd

If it fine to have an opinion about a matter, but perhaps sometimes it's a good idea to take a step back and listen to the viewpoint of someone who actually lives in the area the story is coming from.

That is one of the main points of NowPublic - to get the eyewitness viewpoint from a real person from that area; not to just read about it from a complete outsiders' perspective.

Your wish that these protestors get raped in jail is both a disgusting and shameful one; you should think long and hard before wishing that on anybody.

1
Mike P

I've been tweeting updates. More shenanigans expected tonight. I'll be reporting.

1
amyjudd

Great - please let us know what happens from there.

0
Moonmike

More happening tonight..

0
jameswacht

14th and madison st oakland riots

jameswacht has contributed a photo to this story.

4
angryindian

How many African men must be shot, beaten and killed by law officers before the nation as a whole decides to take a serious and honest look at itself?  These riots are natural reactions to Euro-American apathy and tacit support for institutional White racism.  The man was shot at point-blank range while he was on his back.  There is no legal or ethical excuse for a highly-trained police officer for such actions.  And even with the incident filmed and filed, the police department, the city of San Francisco and the general White public still supports the officers in question.

The parallels to the Gazan crisis are glaring us all in the face.  What are "we" going to do about it?

3
Paschen

They are not African, they are Black American or Visible minorities though. I do not think that any of them what to go back to Africa nor that Africa would want them to either. Same for the Caucasian American They do not wan to go back to Europe or Minor Asia nor does Europe or Minor Asia want them to. They are all America Citizen. 


1
angryindian

Paschen, you should really take care correcting folks on how they identify themselves.  As a member of the African community in the United States, I find your insistence on "clarifying" who and what we are highly offensive.  Many of us, more than you could ever know or understand, proudly identify as "African."  Many others ethnic groups define themselves by their original familial nationality, we are no different.  We reserve the right to define ourselves, a right we lost when we were brought to this landmass and still denied socio-politically as evidenced by your remarks. 

If you meant for your remarks to be centred on political nationality, then you should say that.  Ethnically and culturally you are way off the mark.

I am also insulted by your further insistence that we do not want to connect with Africa and that we would not be welcome if we were to return.  It is not unfair for me to define your views as racist and anti-African.  In West Africa, (where my father's Yoruba people hail from) we are known as the "Lost Generations" and there are people dedicated to rituals and days of rememberance to our loss via the European slave trade and the Middle Passage.  We were never forgotten and when Malcolm X visited African heads of state, they asked when we as a group were ready to come home.  The African Diasporic community, (and it is a community) is defined by no less an authority that the African Union that made it clear that the Diaspora is:

"[consisting] of people of African origin living outside the continent, irrespective of their citizenship and nationality and who are willing to contribute to the development of the continent and the building of the African Union." Its constitutive act declares that it shall "invite and encourage the full participation of the African Diaspora as an important part of our continent, in the building of the African Union."

Please consider the history behind what you have written here.  If I were born in Japan I may be considered a Japanese national, but you cannot expect me to be regarded as a "Japanese" by those of Japanese ethnic heritage.  To suggest oterhwise is intentially misleading and indicative of the long practised habit Europeans have about defining who and what other people are.  Its time for that habit to be discarded.

4
Paschen

I do not have any problem how you identify your self or call your self, yet at lest call it African American and even that would be offensive to a great number of Africans, You talk about your self and you want and rights, what about others rights? 

For the sake of argument, Africa is a continent and most African American do mainly originate from 4 African Countries at least the area are today 4 countries. Not Africa though. 

I think you may want to talk to All African Nations how they feel about that. 

I know European do not like it to much when America say they are Spanish or French. No for them they may be of decent yes, but they are no longer Spanish nor French, they are American. 

Algerian for a fact really do not like this association since they are African and do not think that American are, no matter their Colour or origin. Same with Tanzanian and Cameroon, the rest i can not say since I never read book from authors of other areas debating the issue nor did I have the chance to discuss it with most African Countries.

All I am saying is that It may be some thing to rethink or at least to care enough to respect other peoples view on it.  Some of my Ancestors 200 years ago where French and Dutch, I am neither, I speak French and yet I am not French, I was born and raised in Africa and I am a Citizen, end off story. Yes my ancestor or some of them came from XZ and Y, I am no longer that person that left there land willingly or forcefully. My roots are African for some Generations and my culture is Franc-o-Berber. 

My French Ancestor where persecuted and forced to move, they where Huguenots and yet I am not any longer.

I live in reality and accept it and I think it is better that way. My Children Grow up In Canada and Japan, they Are Canadian not Franc-o-Berber any longer. They do not even understand the culture nor accept the rules and moral values of North West Africa any longer, they do accept Canadian values though and identify with the land they live in and call home.

I do not impose my views, I do however express them as I see them and I am always willing to learn and understand another view point. are You?


0
angryindian

Again, the question here is your insistence on defining how Africans in the United States should label ourselves.  In light of our wel-documented history of dispalcement and colonialisation,  I view your position as one of Europocentricism in practise.  And it also needs to be pointed out that one does not need to be 100% European ethnically or nationally to impose that view on others. 

Being, for all accounts and purposes, a "White" man born and raised in Africa logically makes you "African" as far as where you come from and I have not denied that.  However, my blood ancestors are indigenous to that continent, therefore, I am African despite where I may happen to reside in the African Diaspora and I will not allow a "White" person born in the African content or elsewhere, to take it upon himself to define me along with a list of reasons why my own people would reject me.  It is not for you to say. 

If you choose not to identify with your Huguenots background, that's your choice.  But as a Euro-settler, you have always had a choice.  My own family is comprised of slaves from three different continents who have had our racial classifications altered to suit the insecurities of the colonial state.  They did not leave under their own steam to immigrate somewhere else where they eventually became part of the colonial power structure.  We were and are subject to the socio-cultural identifications imposed on us the state and maintained via social pressure from Europeans and those brainwashed into believing that the Euro-First rule is the sole view of the universe.  Perhaps this is not your story, but it is the story of millions of others and your comments are clearly not taking these factors in account.

 When discussions of group membership are raised, almost exclusively the discourse is driven along Euro-settler colonialist lines or the newspeak of the neo-liberal commisars.  I recognise and understand this aspect of colonialism and I suggest you review the work of Franz Fanon and Jean-Paul Sartre or the other structural analysis papers on the intentional re-definitions of nationality and group identifications to eliminate group identity and resistence to settler-states.  The new globalism is nothing less than neo-liberal corporate colonialism and it is inclusive of the racialisms colonialism has developed over the centuries.

To not understand this is to not understand the damage created by European and other colonial expansions to indigenous populations and smaller nations.  This is the imposition I speak of and that I deplore.  I am not saying that you are racially biased, I am saying that your insistence on making blanket statements concerning the African Diaspora stem from a tradition of Europocentric racialisms that are no longer tolerated by African people today.  The view in Africa may be different, but we are all living under some from of either direct or remote colonial control and subject to the psychological games of our respective situtations.

Please take these issues into account before insisting on defining attitudes opinions amongst those of the Diaspora. Its our decision, not yours. 

3
Paschen

Every one around the Globe is indigenous to Africa, since that is where Humanity comes from and moved from there around the World,  a well documented facts as well.  There for we would then all be African and are as a matter of fact all of that Continent and are its peoples descendent. And that would be actually very accurate.

You do talk about choices versus none, The Huguenot had not choice either nor did the Dutch Protestant in 1578.  We do always have a choice, they ended up in Germany as second class citizen or Slaves until the 30 year war. My Berber ancestors had a choice as well as the Housa in my Family Tree. So do I. And I do respect your choice as well.

  Edit for spelling.


0
angryindian

The birth-zone for all humanity has been known and accepted as western scientific fact for decades, has that done anything at all to stop institutional racism and Europocentrism?  No, it has not.  If anything, it has sped up the rape of the African continent and its peoples since capitalists around the world have perverted this reality to justify their "investment" in Africa as a "homecoming."  Africa has always been controlled by outside imperialist forces, settler invasions, foreign occupations and subversive plots such as the new AFRICOM and Christian missionary zealots.  So raising the universal brotherhood of African origin means nothing when paired with this history.

As far as the "choices" you mention, it depends greatly on how you look, where you are and how your oppression, if any, benefits the state in which you reside.  Whites have not experienced sub-class institutional racism in Africa and whatever oppression Huguenots endured in Europe during its religious conflicts has nothing to do with Africa.  What does any of this have to do with the persistence of assumed Europocentric privilege that at will claims authority in shaping our collectively jaundiced view of the world?

0
eastvanray

"Whites have not experienced sub-class institutional racism"?????  Tell that to the white farmers in Zimbabwe (the few that have not been killed or run off their farms by threat of death!  I think they would beg to differ.  Not only have they experienced racism they have experienced ethnic cleansing. 

1
Mike P

I don't consider the destruction of private property a natural reaction. It is stupidity. Some of the businesses that had windows smashed were owned by African Americans. These people have to pay $1000 to $3000 for a new windows.

I hope Oakland can express itself in a less destructive manner in the future. 

4
angryindian

If you would take the time to understand how social reactions to state terrorism function, you would understand my use of the term, "natural."  When populations are marginalised and subject to police or military oppression, how would you expect them to react when one of their number is clearly executed in public and the killer is being protected by the municipality and the Euroamerican power structure?  How many times is this supposed to happen before the country can admit to its racist attitudes towards African males?  There are people defending this killing even after watching the taping of the shooting on the basis of the race/ethnicity of the victim.  When a people are sick and tired of being abused by the system, what does anyone expect but a breakdown of civility and overt animosity towards the system.

Are you even concerned by the murder of this young man and the other innocent African men shot, choked or beaten to death by law officers?  When is enough, enough?

5
eastvanray

I have a question that has been in the back of my mind for years amd it seems this may be a time to pose it.  Why does it seem that Black Americans (mainly poor black Americans) choose to stress their (often tenuous) connection to Africa so stronly?  I am Canadian (not Swedish-Canadian although those roots are only 2 generations removed) and in Canada we have a minority that has taken a very similar approach to their choice of self-identification - French-Canadians.  They have one thing culturally that African-Americans do not - a distinct and historically significant major language - French.

I am from the West where few French-Canadians live and so we do not have a lot of contact with them outside of some festivals and some national media.  If you speak to many "anglos" (English Canadians) you will find that whetever resentment that is harboured is mainly due to their wanting so much to be distinct and treated speciall that the many Canadians look upon them as being somewhat less than full fledged Canadians.

Is it possible that some of the racial tensions between blacks and whites in the US has to do with blacks wanting to be so stronly identified with Africa (a place most of them have neither been or will even travel to) that white america views them as less than American?

0
angryindian

I take it you are either forgetting or consciously ignoring the history of Euro-settler colonialism and the tradition of institutional racism in the United States.  We, as African people did not immigrate to the Americas, we were forcibly brought here as chattel.  We have lost our names, our languages and our identities as free peoples.  We were beaten or killed as an example to others for speaking our own tongues, for dancing, or for insisting on calling ourselves by our own names.  To ignore this point muddies the debate.  As slaves we were denied any knowledge of ourselves, our names were taken from us as were our nationalities, religions and traditions. 

This was done on purpose to disguise our sense of self thereby making us better tools of labour for the American capitalist system.  In order to fully dominate a people, the psychological aspects of their identity must be altered to view the colonialist as "Godlike" and possessing the power to destroy any and all resistance at will.  Despite this, many Africans in the U.S., the Gullah People in particular, have managed to retain our identity and we know that our history goes beyond slavery.  We know that we are the first people of the planet Earth and we have learned not to hate our origins but to embrace them and take pride in them.  And it is a history and we are a people who have much to be proud of.  So I find your question odd in that you suggest that perhaps our pride in this background is a cause of traditional Euro-American racism. 

Propaganda in American popular culture being what it is, Africans have always been portrayed as sub-humans "lucky" enough to have been "saved" by White society and culture.  This falsehood is an important element of American culture and its impact on the film industry has served to define Africans and other minorities in the U.S. within racially negative themes.  This has reinforced the perspective that White is Right, within the socio-political hierarchy we are all apparently lumbered with worldwide. 

There is an excellent documentary written by Melvin Van Peebles titled: "Classified X" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUDDPkcCfQE  This doc goes a long way in explaining how American popular culture was "trained" to see Africans as "dangerous," "lazy" and "stupid" and why so many of us demand to be respected as full human beigns with a history beyond the claimed borders of the continental United States.

What most people do not realise when they call for a negation of ethnic identification in the United States and other colonial-states, (such as Occupied Tibet) is that the question then arises, which socio-cultural and political paradigm then should be the norm?  The colonalist's way always wins the argument, provided there is allowed a faction or two of the minority's elements to make it all seem as if this is a parlay between equals.  Of course this is not so and the numerous, not so easily observable psychological factors that play a vital role in colonialism deserve to be examined by those seeking to understand institutional racism.

 

2
Pythiian1

This story is tragic and it's completely unnecessary for the police department to have used such a deadly force against a harmless individual.  I am sad, but not surprised. 

I've relatives in northern California who still remember a dreadful case of excessive force that was dismissed by San Francisco grand jury.  Two policemen, well over 6 ft tall, shot a young Vietnamese woman in front of her two young boys because they "thought" the 5 ft. tall woman was wielding a weapon when they busted in her home based on a wrong tip, as it was later revealed.  She had a potato/carrot peeler in her hand.  In short, the San Francisco grand jury dismissed charges against the policemen reasoning that it was accidental since the men genuinely believed that the Vietnamese woman was going to hurt them.  There were protests, letters sent to the police commissioner demanding for the two men to be sacked, which they weren't, but placed on desk-duty.  The at-large community didn't even care enough to step up its social responsibility by convicting the two policemen for using excessive deadly force. 

I still believe society, if we have the will, to force the law enforcement authority to change its tendencies to harm first, ask question later, or not.  It is anathema to a civilized nation. 

2
Karen Hatter

I agree with you, Pythiian1. Society must force the change that is needed within law enforcement, within all branches, be they private security, transit, city, state or local.

Too often their actions are cloaked in the 'code of slience' that is rampant in the law enforcement culture. Even when it is obvious to all of police wrong doing, some legalistic manuever is used to extracate guilty parties from prosecution.

I hope this will not end in yet another act of absolution of those involved in this tragic murder.

 

0
rawpaint

To me this is all very simple -- those who are tasked with the responsibility of enforcing the law should be held to (at least) the same standard of law as the common citizen. If a common citizen had shot and killed another citizen and his identity was known, he would be held in custody pending further investigation of the events that led to the shooting and death. Period. However, as we see, that did NOT happen in this instance because the man who held the weapon, discharged it and caused (with criminal intent or not) the death of a  citizen was a rapid transit police officer. This double standard should not be acceptable in a civil society. Why was this man not held for questioning? Why was he not further detained pending investigation?

The answer is because the position of "police officer" is protected under the law from the same level of scrutiny and responsibility that would be expected of an ordinary citizen. Note that it isn't this particular individual that is being protected -- it is the position of authority common to all police officers that is being protected. That is the problem. Why should those who are charged with the responsibility of enforcing the law be protected by a different standard of the law? 

2
eastvanray

That sould be so obvious that is need not be said but I have a feeling that is not the case.  I guess living in Canada I have a different experience with police who, on average, are very professional and are held to the same laws they are charged to uphold.  Anything less is unacceptable.  And if that is the problem why don't these rioting cowards take their anger out on the police rather than raging against innicent people's private property?  Takew on the police and show us that your are committed and that you have a pair!

0
angryindian

No offense, but are Canadian law officers "professional" when dealing with First Nations people?  I think not.

0
glenda yohans

finally americans have shown some balls ,iam shocked i must say , honestly u are biggest pussys and wimps, how many of u get killed abused taken freedom u have no healthcare and no freedoms and u do Nothing about it just take more ,this protest is really nothing but i guess its a little moove ,what else do they need to u before u rise up as nation like romanians did or other nations???

0
kingpaddy

Canada is a wonderful country, Eastvanray.  I visit as often as I can and get some perspective I cannot find here. (Texas)  It is unfortunate that I am even educated about social unrest, police brutality and cultural fictions.  Fort Worth is the first town I have lived in since I was a child where I trust and respect the police.  I am 60 and grew up in L.A. when it was a great place to live.  Later on in the sixties it became LAPD and LA County Sherriffs territory.  I was beat for having long hair.  More than once.  It was just that easy too as everyone thought it was like on TV, Dragnet and other police shows.

I sat two blocks away from the Watts Riots on the day my father was sent home from his job at the bank by the FBI.  Five hours later the spontaneous riots began..

I was a student at Berkley (Cal) when the "Peoples Park riots happened.  Two very different populations with one thing in common.  No one of any import cared or listened to the people involved.  Worst than that, we were pushed.  Violently.  I have never rioted.  I don't really understand it.  I do know what it feels like for authority figures to pick you out and inflict violence. 

I object strongly to any post that declares this murder is about them and their cause.  I work with Africans and travel to Nigeria when duty calls.  Nigerians are appalled by the behaviors of many African-Americans when it comes to family.  They don't want to be judged by those who lack respect for their families.

I admit that diaspora communities have different values and some cannot adapt.  At Fresno State University I was educated by Armenians.  At that time more Armenians lived in Fresno than Armenia.  The 1913 genocide took the lives of millions.  They had a long tradition of family and self-respect to work with. 

Canadians expect justice and respect.  And that is just what they get.  Thanks for being such a good neighbor.


Paddy

0
gangstalking

I think people are angry because there is no justice when things like this happen, they feel frustrated, and we have all seen time and time again where the process fails to get justice for the victim involved. In this case a young man was executed, cameraphones caught the execution, or else the police would have said he was resisting arrest. The other things that is really horrible about this, is the lack of any respect paid to this young man that had just been shot in the back while lying face down. There is no value for the life that was taken. They just continued on as usual, if they had even freaked out a little, but after a second to react, they all went back to busines as usual, and this is not that uncommon anymore. That is where the anger comes from, you just have to get that out, because the injustice is just so great.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Oneiros
First Flagged at 12:01 PM, Jan 8, 2009 by Oneiros
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (32)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from