NP Rank:
Obama Administration may regret CIA Prosecution
Bowing to pressure from the left, Obama will become emmersed in a political war which will stir up divisive feelings more than ever. From today's Wall Street Journal:
It would be unfair to prosecute dedicated men and women working to protect America for conduct that was sanctioned in advance by the Justice Department." –Attorney General Eric Holder, April 2009
"Justice Department Names Prosecutor to Reopen CIA Abuse Cases" –Wall Street Journal, yesterday
Mr. Holder had it right the first time. His about-face yesterday, compounded by his release of a 2004 internal CIA report on that agency's handling of terrorists, opens a political war that President Obama, the CIA and above all the country will live to regret.
This is a trap the Administration set for itself. Mr. Obama and his team have attempted to appease their political left by publicly denouncing the Bush Administration's national security policies, even as they claimed to want to forget the past. Their disparagement has only fed the liberal demand for Bush prosecutions and increased the pressure on Mr. Holder to appoint a prosecutor.
The Journal notes that although Holder has said that this is merely preliminary investigating, Special Prosecutions take on a life of their own. The effects could be long -lasting and detrimental to morale. This is not auspicious for fulfilling the idea of Change based on a new Unity, something which made Obama so broadly appealing on the campaign trail.
All of this will further demoralize a CIA that has already been stigmatized by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats as an agency populated by rogues who lied to Congress. This is the same agency that Mr. Obama and all Americans are counting on wage a war against al Qaeda and deter future terrorist attacks. The message that Mr. Holder's criminal probe will send to thousands of men and women is that they had better not do anything remotely controversial on behalf of American safety, even with a lawyer's permission. This war against our own war fighters comes just as President Obama's counterterror escalation in Afghanistan is getting more difficult.
Further concern was voiced by McClatchey Newspapers:
By naming a special prosecutor to investigate whether CIA officers or contractors violated the Bush administration's interrogation policies, Attorney General Eric Holder has struck a middle course that isn't likely to satisfy anyone and could complicate President Barack Obama's broader political agenda.Holder named John Durham, a longtime federal prosecutor in Connecticut, after the CIA Monday released a heavily censored 2004 inspector general's report on abuses by interrogators who exceeded the "enhanced interrogation techniques" the Bush administration Justice Department had approved.
Obama, vacationing on Martha's Vineyard when the decision was announced Monday, sought to keep his distance and mollify all sides. He said through a spokesman that he's focused on the future but committed to letting his attorney general do what he considers necessary.
In an already rancorous political atmosphere, however, anger among Republicans who oppose any prosecutions and liberals who think the administration should pursue the Bush administration officials who authorized the interrogation techniques could make it even harder for Obama to count on broad coalitions to enact his agenda, from health care to climate change and immigration.
However, the matter might still be viewed in a non-partisan way, and from an essentialist perspective. Obama could well be viewed as nobel for probing and meta-analyzing what the meaning of "torture" is; why it is not acceptable for a mega-democracy and super power to engage in it under any circumstances; a discourse opening regarding the limits of war, the power of sacrifice, of being kind to those who do not deserve kindness because it is a matter of principle, of humaneness, of strength. I am not so sure the matter HAS to be divisive: What is clear, is that those who are party on both sides will make it so.
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 00:29 on August 25th, 2009
As one on the outside looking in, in the present political climate, I can.t see this not being divisive. It will also be seen by the Right as Obama passing the buck to the Attorney General. We saw what a Special Prosecutor did to the Clinton/Lewinsky drama.
Depicting the other side as evil certainly will not unite the country.
at 03:53 on August 25th, 2009
You are right about that, for sure! Yes, special prosecutors do not make for unity. :(
at 12:08 on August 25th, 2009
I just think that Pres Obama is trying to consolidate more Power in the executive Branch. The CIA does interrogations. The FBI should stick with criminals and solving cases in it's back log.
I am not sure how it will pan out in the end, but I do know that President Obama wants centralized power. Those on the left that complained about Pres. Bush should be yelling here as well... but all I hear are crickets
at 12:25 on August 25th, 2009
Doh! Just responded to you in a private message, should have done so here. Yes, all is partisan: crickets chirping on the left while the right wails; under W the right had the crickets while the left screamed. But for good or ill, you seem to believe Obama is expanding his executive powers, strengthening himself?
at 15:53 on August 27th, 2009
To the quote that "prosecution of dedicated man and women is unfair"... Nuremberg, Adolf Eichmann, and war crimes. The CIA has long over stepped its power and engaged in more torture and murder than Mossad, even after its supposed reform.
Furthermore, a special prosecutor is used to attempt, though it will most likely not, to be able to defend against charges of bias and a cover-up if the results of the investigation prove the CIA is not culpable for anything. Though this is as unlikely as the economy being fixed by the end of the year.
at 15:54 on August 27th, 2009
Well, well spoken!!!