NP Rank:
Obama approves High Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG)
President Obama has made another move to distance himself from Bush policies on interrogation. He has approved the creation of an elite team of interrogators to question key terrorism suspects
This elite team of interrogators would be overseen by the National Security Council, removing this task from the CIA. Effectively this gives the White House oversight. HIG will be made up of several intelligence and law enforcement agencies. It will be housed with the FBI, but overseen by the National Security Council.
President Obama has approved the creation of an elite team of interrogators to question key terrorism suspects, part of a broader effort to revamp U.S. policy on detention and interrogation, senior administration officials said Sunday.
Obama signed off late last week on the unit, named the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group, or HIG. Made up of experts from several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, the interrogation unit will be housed at the FBI but will be overseen by the National Security Council -- shifting the center of gravity away from the CIA and giving the White House direct oversight.
Crowd Power
-
V. Handly
United States
Recommendations (46)
-
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Criticom
Chicago, Illinois, United States -
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines -
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
-
Barry Artiste
Vancouver, Canada -
jazzyzazzy
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
politisite
Columbia, South Carolina, United States -
marianmo
Mission, Canada




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (19)
at 04:48 on August 24th, 2009
Just shows lack of distrust in the CIA. But is the Whitehouse and FBI qualified in analyzing the intelligence gleaned.
Fist link the FBI, CIA and Military Intelligence together, then segregate the CIA from interrogation and give it to the FBI. hmmmmn sounds like loads of distrust in the Whitehouse. A leaky or a sneaky CIA?
at 05:45 on August 24th, 2009
Sneaky CIA is a contradiction of terms.
at 05:48 on August 24th, 2009
lol
at 06:06 on August 24th, 2009
It is just another example of passing the buck. Bush said no one in his admin conducted torture, when in reality that was true. what he didn't say is that his mom's prison guard goon squad was the ones who did it. All former CIA spooks and mercs, but now private employees, not government employees.
at 06:35 on August 24th, 2009
You got that round the wrong way. It put the president in the driving seat and the buck stops at his chair? He now has the final say about how integration is done and has cut out the CIA of whom lie about how the interrogation is done.
Now he can lie himself if he wishes, lol
at 06:12 on August 24th, 2009
Blackwater is still being used today.
at 06:34 on August 24th, 2009
I'd like to know what Mr. Obama is planning to do about the Bandar prison where there are many more prisoners than at Guantanamo and where, allegedly, torture is still widely used today. Everytime a reporter tries to get an answer regarding Bandar, the President seems quite uncomfortable. One wonders why.
at 07:09 on August 24th, 2009
Source: my.nowpublic.com
Possibly because he could not work out where Bandar prison was, its very difficult to work out who controls, who what and where the CIA have set up action (just kidding).
The sensible answer is: He can not do nothing to release the prisoners with out going to war with Iran. I would be uncomfortable about that if I was him as War's cost money and there is not enough oil there to make it viable.
at 07:15 on August 24th, 2009
Besides he has more than a handful in Afghanistan. Apparently McChrystal will ask for 20,000 additional troops next week. The Chief of the Joint Chiefs made the round on Sunday talk shows to prepare the people for that option.
at 06:43 on August 24th, 2009
Iranian Dissidents in Prison Are Forced To Resort To A Hunger Strike. Is Bandar prison one of those?
at 06:58 on August 24th, 2009
It certainly not a US run prison, really confusing and I can only find one with that name in Malaysia. Got to be a red herring as it makes little sense, lol
Oh over than its run by the CIA and not by the Malaysian government, of course its to do with conspiracy etc. Oh dear forgot what we where debating about, lol
at 06:52 on August 24th, 2009
Where is Banda prison? Malaysia!
Is it US sovereign property? Nope!
?
at 06:57 on August 24th, 2009
Iran has a Banda prison too. I'm confused by that comment as well.
at 07:00 on August 24th, 2009
lol are the CIA running it? sorry could not resist...
at 07:03 on August 24th, 2009
Doubtful lol
at 08:14 on August 24th, 2009
good post interesting comments
at 13:08 on August 24th, 2009
Another example of consolidating control. I wonder where those who argued Bush was power hungry are now as Pres. Obama has 34 Czars and trying to consolidate power to the executive branch. Election after election I see the party in power blame the previous administration, then go about doing the same things.
at 17:19 on August 24th, 2009
Bang on Polisisite.
at 21:44 on August 24th, 2009
What? is this new interrogation team going to supply tea, biscuits, and group hugs? I think Al is right, it will be pretty much Same SH*T, Different Diaper!