OBAMA BIOETHICS CZAR BLOCKED FROM TALKING TO TARGETED JOURNALIST

by Scrivener | March 28, 2011 at 08:07 am
2442 views | 1 Recommendation | 196 comments

Did federal agents or homeland security- directed fusion center operatives falsely and pejoratively infer that veteran reporter Vic Livingston -- who has exposed U.S. government microwave radio frequency weapon assaults on so-called "targeted individuals" -- posed a threat to the personal safety of the president of the University of Pennsylvania?

Do Secret Service agents talk into their sleeves?


GET POLITICAL w/ VIC LIVINGSTON


A not-so-funny thing happened to me Friday afternoon in the lobby of the University of Pennsylvania's administration building as I tried to leave a message for university President Amy Gutmann Ph.D., who is also the chairperson of a presidential commission investigating whether Americans are being harmed by programs of human biomedical experimentation.

I assumed I was being gumshoed; that's been the standard M.O. for the past seven years, since I realized that I was being extrajudicially persecuted, professionally and personally deconstructed by a multi-agency covert federal program that targets U.S. citizens who have been slandered by witch hunting ideologues and hate-mongers at all levels of government as "dissidents," undesirables or potential security threats.

But what I did not expect was that the 21st century McCarthyites running this American Gestapo would be so brazen as to infer to a noted American scholar that a 60-year-old journalist trying to leave her a written note somehow put her personal safety in jeopardy.

Once again, it appears, I have been slandered and defamed to an important person by government operatives who believe they've been granted an open license to commit politically-motivated character assassination under the false flags of national security and public safety.

But by their actions, these operatives also have drawn even more attention to my journalism -- articles which appear to have a direct bearing on the work of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, chaired by Dr. Gutmann.

So I suppose I can thank the American Gestapo for that unintended consequence.

So what exactly happened as I entered the lobby of the UPenn administration building's stately Gothic lobby -- with fusion center or federal agent operatives apparently surveilling my every move?

I approached the desk, introduced myself by name to the security guard, and asked if I could leave a short written note with Dr. Gutmann's secretary.  I explained that I was a journalist and wanted to call her attention to an article I had written that has a direct bearing on her work.

The security guard said I could leave the note with him and that he would make sure she got it.  So far, so good.  I took out a notepad and began to jot down a short message, along with the internet address of my website, NowPublic.com/scrivener.  Specifically, I suggested that she read two articles, the links to which appear just above my biography on that web page:

nowpublic.com/world/u-s-silently-tortures-americans-cell-tower-microwaves

nowpublic.com/world/rule-law-morality-die-usa-fusion-center-slow-kill-genocide


As I was writing out the note, Dr. Gutmann suddenly came walking down the lobby's staircase, accompanied by a man dressed in civilian clothes, who, from his demeanor and appearance, looked very much like a police detective or a security agent.

As I saw her descending the stairs into the lobby, I extended my hand in greeting and said, "Just who I wanted to see!  I'm Vic Livingston, the former business reporter for Fox 29 Ten o' Clock News."

Dr. Gutmann smiled, shook my hand, and courteously stopped for a moment as I said words to this effect:

"I've written some articles that have a direct bearing on your work on the bioethics commission..."

Before I could finish my thought, the man accompanying her said sternly, "We've got to go," as he gestured to Dr. Gutmann, pointing toward a side door.

"This will take just a second," I said.  At that point, what was a courteous, unexpected encounter turned cold.

"I've got to go," Dr. Gutmann said with a poker face, walking away briskly and out the side door.

The man who had been accompanying her stayed behind.

"I'll take your note," he said.  "Make sure you write down your phone number." 

So I did.  But as I was appending the note, the security guard, who had been so professional just moments before, suddenly rose from his chair and approached me and Dr. Gutmann's handler.  He came very close, literally pinning me between his chest and other man.  I felt physically intimidated.

I finished writing out my phone number and handed the note to Dr. Gutmann's handler, suggesting that he might be interested in my articles as well.  The man assured me that he would give the note to Dr. Gutmann, and he also exited through the side door from which the university president had left in a huff just moments before.

The security guard walked back to his desk and returned to his seat.  I walked over and said words to this effect  "Wow.  It sure seems like somebody doesn't want me talking to Dr. Gutmann."

And then the security guard admonished me:  "If you are going to be persistent, we are going to have to involve the campus police."

I was taken aback by the remark.  "You don't have to threaten me," I said, before I turned to make leave.  "Have a nice day."

As I exited the administration building and walked down the steps to the UPenn's Locust Walk, I spotted a young man in casual dress carrying a plastic bag emblazoned with the logo of the United States Treasury and the words "U.S. Mint."  The Mint is directly adjacent to the federal building in Philadelphia, which houses the field offices of the Secret Service, FBI, IRS and other federal agencies.  The young man's countenance screamed out "federal agent."  So I approached him and said something like this, with a smile:

"I suppose you're waiting for me." 

"Are we THAT obvious?"  he replied, also smiling.

"Don't answer that -- you may incriminate yourself!" I muttered.  We both laughed.

"Here," I said, "let me give you the address to my web site.  When you go back to the office, tell your guys to read my articles -- we're all playing for the same team, you know."

I began to walk away, and the guy fell in next to me.  So I continued:

"If this is a case of mistaken identity, I apologize; but I don't think so!"

I took a sharp right turn, and lost my "tail."

From the way this incident came down, it is apparent that the fusion center Gestapo's pervasive 24-hour surveillance of my telecommunications and supposedly private premises led my witch-hunters to surmise that I came to the UPenn campus to leave a message for Dr. Gutmann.  I had tried to email her a short note with the links to my articles; it was addressed to the email address listed on the Bioethics.gov web site.  I also attempted to email her at the address listed on the UPenn administration web site.  

As seen over my (military contractor Lockheed Martin intercepted and censored) internet connection, that address appears as follows: "presweb@pobox.upenn.edu."  To my eye, something about that address, as displayed over my intercepted and (military contractor Lockheed Martin- censored) connection just does not look right.  So I decided to deliver the message in person.

Over the past seven years, I have learned from experience that my emails and telephone calls to important people almost never reach the intended recipients, and hardly ever get returned.  In several instances, it appears that my calls are answered by impostors; in a recent call to The editorial offices of The Washington Post, the person who answered said he was not at liberty to give me the office phone number of journalist Bob Woodward, who has said in interviews that even his home phone number appears in the phone book.  When I asked the person on the other end for the name of the executive editor of The Post, he was flummoxed, and I was switched to "music on hold" -- the same tune that I often hear when I suspect my calls have been diverted to what we "targets" call "the program."

I've been around the block in these parts for many years -- decades, in fact. I know many important people -- including some people with access to Dr. Amy Gutmann.  I will find out -- as I suspect -- if agents or operatives falsely advised this important person that my presence on campus posed a security threat.

If my suspicions are correct, I intend to take all prudent and appropriate measures to restore my good name -- and to hold accountable those persons and entities behind this apparent campaign of politically-motivated character and career assassination.

FOR VIC LIVINGSTON'S REPORTING ON SILENT NO-TOUCH ELECTROMAGNETIC TORTURE AND EXTRAJUDICIAL PERSECUTION IN AMERICA, SEE:

nowpublic.com/world/u-s-silently-tortures-americans-cell-tower-microwaves

nowpublic.com/world/rule-law-morality-die-usa-fusion-center-slow-kill-genocide

nowpublic.com/world/u-s-govt-runs-gang-stalking-vigilantism-says-ex-fbi-official

nowpublic.com/world/u-s-govt-censors-internet-political-speech-fraud-deception

NowPublic.com/scrivener

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
The 1

Actually batvette makes excellent points incognito. Scrivener continuous contention of some microwave cell tower, precision targeting individuals with microwaves actually flies in the face of his own recent post @06:03 on June 2nd, 2011 which states..

 "precision-targeted, precision-tuned brain frequencies via RF subcarrier directly into the minds of targeted citizens, whose neurological and physiological functions are manipulated and disrupted from afar. A university researcher for the U.S.Army's electronics warfare branch calls this electromagnetic "ultrasonic neuromanipulation."

Once again, and as I suggested several times previously to Scrivener, that the technology being described here ( by him actually ) is called 'Remote Neural Monitoring' (RNM) eg."electromagnetic ultrasonic neuromanipulation.". A 'Total Awareness' government global/domestic surveillance program run by super computers out of Fort Meade, MD (NSA). This apparently all being to much for Scrivener pea size brain and pinhead to comprehend. Scrivener stated/suggested technological description above is still inaccurate though concerning a RNM technology systems attack.

0
eTortureHertz

If a gang banger jacks your car
Does it really matter what type of weapon he threatens you with?

If a rapist rapes your ass
Does it really matter what type of object he or she uses?

If a paranoid skitsoid pounds your head with an invisible beam weapon
Does it matter which neighbors dog told him to do it?

Or what breed it is?

0
EricCire

The porn-soaked cybernazi mind's attempt at creativity in cyberspamming.  eTorture, indeed. You guys are way overpaid. The Torture Matrix -- one huge black hole of taxpayer money. Meanwhile, social security benefits and unemployment help are called "entitlements" and are scuttled, so that more money can be wasted on corporate "defense" predators and their slithy toves.

0
eTortureHertz

"Electromagnetic radiation is often described by its frequency—the number of oscillations of the perpendicular electric and magnetic fields per second—expressed in hertz."

"Electromagnetic radiation with frequencies in the low terahertz range, (intermediate between those of the highest normally usable radio frequencies and long-wave infrared light), is often called terahertz radiation. Even higher frequencies exist, such as that of gamma rays, which can be measured in exahertz. (For historical reasons, the frequencies of light and higher frequency electromagnetic radiation are more commonly specified in terms of their wavelengths or photon energies: for a more detailed treatment of this and the above frequency ranges, see electromagnetic spectrum.)"

Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

The "eTorture" part was inspired by the buzz word "email" short for "electronic mail" and the Hertz part is an obvious play on words. When I reported the assault to a local police jurisdiction I was instructed to join an online support group for victims. Therefore I hang out here in Scrivener's virtual think tank and I maintain a contact portal at etorturehertz.wordpress.com
disclaimer: I am not a disinfo agent nor am I associated with etorture.net

0
EricCire

The porn-soaked cybernazi mind's attempt at creativity in cyberspamming.  eTorture, indeed. More taxpayer money wasted on corporate "defense" predators and their slithy toves.

0
EricCire

And you reek, reek, reek, too, The 1. You and your Remote Neural Monitoring fear-mongering.

0
batvette

"but unlike real victims"

by your own standard you're a fraud,  that settles it.

So I  suppose if I made up a bunch of **** that's not happening to me that will impress the resident troll?

Any man without the skills and initiative to keep people out of their home, particularly with family members, is a LOSER. Got that, bubba? I don't buy this "people sneak in and tie my shoelaces together and move stuff around" silliness anyway.

"my story" is available from my user page here at nowpublic, anyone can view it. "your story" is strangely nonexistent and you post from dozens of identities. joke.  

You are probably what  you constantly accuse others of from behind your anonymous facade, but whatever you are I think you know how I can be found. Look me up if you're ever in San Diego, and want to settle this like a man.

cowardly POS.

IN THE END this is more of typical Vic, caught again outright lying he has no more credible rebuttal than attempt to discredit the person revealing his fraud. Say what you like about me, the astute reader will simply see which person made a claim that was patently untrue, a lie- and which one they are asked to believe an anonymous user is discrediting with zero evidence, just their word for it.

0
EricCire

The phony cybercensor ad at the top of nowpubic's page reads:  "Online Rants can Ruin Reputations" at Reputation.com. (As if.)    It should read "Online RUNTS Troll the Internet." 

0
The 1

Personally I believe after reading or viewing what this incognito ( 'EricCire'_current name and probably is also 'eTortureHertz' ) has been been saying in multiple post, under multiple names, in multiple articles on NowPublic, that he is probably a fraud TI. Suffering from some psychotic, anti-social, inferiority complex/dilemma. Seems bent on self destruction/annihilation. Has, like Scrivener, painted himself into his own little box of self righteous anti-government delusional bullshit. Trying to draw others into it. After reading a few of his psycotic rants, you quickly realize, as with Scrivener, that they both are clueless, hate spewing morons. Exhibiting anti government psychosis based either on their own self imposed hell and twisted imaginations, or additionally in Scrivener case, RNM attack trauma. Both definitely exhibit forms of schizophrenia ( and stupidity ).

0
eTortureHertz

I am not EricCire or any other variation of that name.
My username Knowledge is Power has been blocked.

0
The 1

Thxs_sorry about that ! incognito has gone by 20+ different names, sometimes answering his own post using different names.

0
eTortureHertz

np

1
EricCire

The cybernazis (Barvette, The1) dwell ad nauseum on attacking posters instead of exposing the methods of the Torture Matrix. They can't expose details of the  new Cointelpro/MKUltra on steroids, because they are part of it -- the part that is paid to troll the Internet to discredit the victims' descriptions of their tortures -- the home invasions, the financial sabotage, the dew attacks.     Ironically, ALL Americans, especially our clueless Congressmen,  are now in the crosshairs of the Evildoers' nationwide Star Wars satellite-enforced electromagnetic/surveillance prison. A small cabal that thumbs its collective military-corporate nose at representative democracy runs  the U.S. and has a victims' list (an alleged terrorist list) that makes Nixon's old hit list look like a girlie-man's.

0
etorturehertz

youtube.com/watch?v=tEVsRLhet2k

0
The 1

 cybernazis=EricCire, Cyberkrieg Exposer (incognito)

0
etorturehertz

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gang+stalking

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 3:13 PM, Mar 29, 2011 by Anonymous (not verified)

Related Stories

Recommendations (1)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from