Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
The Obama birth certificate forgery: Shaking the belief system
Share:
by World_Groove | May 11, 2011 at 04:11 pm
1408 views | 1 Recommendation | 27 comments
Photos
The Obama birth certificate forgery:
Shaking the belief system of the public to its very core.
There is no longer any doubt that the digital birth certificate released by the Obama Administrations a forgery. What remains to be seen is whether an excusable reason for the document tampering exists.
In a weeks time since my original story "New anomalies discovered in the "Obama Birth Documents", my source has gone from light hearted and amicable to a state of being best described as disassociated, cold and mechanical. "I just don't know what to believe anymore, we took on this assignment expecting to prove without a doubt the document was real to such an extent that the conspiracy theories surrounding the Presidents birth would go away, but instead we have opened something worse than Pandora's box". The body of proof is massive and damning. While performing digital forensics on the Obana COLB (Certificate Of Live Birth), my source's team have uncovered the base layer document used as a template, and is extracting information concerning names and dates of the people involved in that document. While exact spellings are still forthcoming, It is now clear the the mother in this original certificate has the last name of KISSY or KI-KISSY. The extraction process continues, but they have been able to shown where directly underneath Stanley Ann Dunham is a different name, and that name is thought to be (_)SHRXI KRY KI-KISSY, Exact spelling is uncertain due to the existence of background noise and document previous scrubbing in the White House PDF and the team is not yet finished their research. KISSY is thought to have been 33 and a resident of Hawaii at the time of the certificate, It is also thought that the certificate could be from 1962, or that in 1962 KISSY was 33 due to a reference in an area of uncovered text.
In other areas of text further names and information have been uncovered, The name "Ocke E Kats" is referenced. This section is filled exceedingly high with background noise but clearly written in this section is the word "MAY" and handwritten "q/q", as well as the numbers, "38, ?-5-52, & 6158". Below that in a similar format we see the name "Frits Shlo" and various groupings of numbers including "39, 52, 0236, 5288" and hybrid groupings "43ps, & w-2". Directly above both these names I was shown a section which still lacks in understanding, but there is a handwritten cursive signature starting with what looks to be an R
In a different section of the document we find a hand written KISSY surrounded by date and times, which could be from the same or separated documents, even back side of documents scanned for the forgery. This section is particularly dense with information, but understanding which level the information is on I am told is quite difficult. "It is hard to tell which jumble of numbers are connected when they are right on top of each other, but we will find out, we are making some sense of the chaos" He points my attention to the monitor "Directly around the handwritten KISSY we have the date 1/5/81, numbers 62, 44, 42, 7, 10 and 33Res (resident age 33?) and BR53251(Birth Record#?, might be incomplete), I know someone with the right resources will be able to find out who KISSY is or was".
"White Out" document
We now know the document released by the White House is a layered fake, both from the perspective of odd typing patterns, as well as "white out" areas contained in one of the layers of the PDF released by the White House.
The original document number is now assumed to be one of the following,
years, 61,62,81 or 82, and the document number being 10012, 10612 or 10812.
One of the most telling fragments alludes to the fact that concealed under the OBAMA signature, the O was originally an R or a P and the next letter B was originally a capital cursive J which went below the line. The R in this section is in direct style to the cursive R found previously hidden. Not out of the question is the fact that is bears striking resemblence to the Registrars signature from 1981 in the BOOTH certificate. It could be that the Registrar signed during an edit change to the document (1/5/81 the date previously mentioned?).
Also from the BOOTH document we have a sample of the attending doctors signature , David A Sinclair MD. Two things jump out upon review of this section, first the lack of the use of M.D. in the OBAMA document, and secondly the style in which he writes the date using x-x in the OBAMA document and x/x in the BOOTH document.
While I have been allowed open access to the findings of this research group, I have only been allowed to release information taken from hand written notes. In the coming days and weeks this reporter will attempt to recreate some of their findings and post the appropriate picture evidence.
While these facts are still not confirmed the group did tell me that I could release the following information for consideration, first:
- "Kenya, South Africa" might have read " South East Asia" underneath its text.
- In Parent section 8, "BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA" appears to have a variation of the name "Damon Shamike Vris" underneath.
- In a separate embedded section of the certificate appears a name which seems to be S (Sajy?) Raess .
Unfortunately I am not allowed to release what appear to be several social security numbers embedded in the document, but I will be trying to confirm those numbers against names for a later report.
"This has to be the most disastrous breach of faith perpetuated by our government since Watergate." My source said sadly. "Whether this is a sick game played by the white house as a joke, or an out and out attempt at a lie, I think this will shake the belief system of the public to its core".
**************************************************************
If you are writing for a web page or news story and you use information from my story please give credit.
If copying and pasting this story, manually or automatically and electronic, please make sure a link back to this original story is contained.
If any main stream journalist want to pick up this story please contact me, I will consider working with you by sharing information.
If you are a research group or have a research group working on this story, please contact me. My acquired and personal documentation is steadily increasing
Images Copyright 2011 WGM
=====================================================
A few nuggets of fun for people researching this subject:
It remains to be seen how many years the form in the OBAMA COLB has been in use. It is quite possible the date used in section 5a could have been 1934 or 1931 on the original document.
Under the time in section 5b, it looks to be 7:56 or 7:36 instead of 7:24
Obvious document errors can be seen in two ways, first by viewing the document as 1600% magnification (largest allowable in stock Acrobat) and slowly following the text and lines from right to left as well as up and down.
To view the "White Out" pages of the White House PDF with basic Acrobat, Simply enlarge the document and "grab" it and pull the mouse in some direction and it will uncover the "White Out" document.
******************************************************************
New anomalies discovered in the "Obama Birth Documents"
Continue reading at NowPublic.com: New anomalies discovered in the "Obama Birth Documents" | NowPublic News Coverage http://my.nowpublic.com/world/new-anomalies-discovered-obama-birth-documents#ixzz1MBopirYB
******************************************************************
The Obama "White Out" Document Exposed
*******************************************************************
The "White out" document "cover up stamp".
*******************************************************************
Advertisement
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Crowd Power
World_Groove
No City, No State, United States
Related Stories
Recommendations (1)
Anonymous user
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (27)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Doc Vega (not verified)at 17:25 on May 11th, 2011
Obama is the worst charlatan that ever defiled the Oval Office, yet America is asleep plagued by citizens too besieged by the cost of food, energy, joblessness, and idiotic legislation. This is just the way the government wants it too. Just keep insulting our intelligence and lying to us, keep us too flustered to embrace the truth, and why not there are actually fools who still believe in Obama and that they should willingly accept a dwindling life style with higher taxes and higher energy so that this all does good for the environment. Obedient worker ants for the proletariat to push around. You know this wouldn't be so hard to take if people used their brains and put up a fight so at least we could see some semblance of public outrage, but the liberals are ready to smear and liable anyone with guts enough to campaign for sane policies and American exceptionalism. My God, the people don't care and have been lulled into stupidity by our blood sucking politicians. And the few voices of reason and outrage are drowned out by the snores of the unconcerned.The American Press should get a prize for blinding the people with their biased views as they ignore the true issues and give us trivial headlines, all planned by their corporate bosses.
at 04:23 on May 12th, 2011
"A charlatan (also called swindler or mountebank) is a person practicing quackery or some similar confidence trick in order to obtain money, fame or other advantages via some form of pretense or deception.
The word comes from French charlatan, a seller of medicines who might advertise his presence with music and an outdoor stage show. The best known of the Parisian charlatans was Tabarin, who set up a stage in the Place Dauphin, Paris in 1618, and whose commedia dell'arte inspired skits and whose farces inspired Molière. Ultimately, etymologists trace "charlatan" from either the Italian ciarlare, to prattle; or from Cerretano, a resident of Cerreto, a village inUmbria, known for its quacks.[1]"
No, President Obama is not practicing quackery. He won the election fairly and squarely. Your allegations of forgery are unsubstantiated time and again by all known authorities.
As for your disdain for politicians, I agree with you. I don't like professional, career politicians.
Obama won the first term because 1) he is intelligent with verifiable credentials, 2) appealed to the common working people, 3) effective organizer, 4) Republicans left the state of the union in disastrous financial state, and 5) Obama promised to fix the problems -- not on a face track, but with steady hand and diligence.
He has done that.
at 10:30 on May 12th, 2011
YankeeJim,
The concerns surrounding the issue which I raised in my story are of a nature of trust in Government, and specifically trust in the President as an "office", not a "person".
I personally do not want this to be an attack on his person or personal ethics until after such time as he more widely recognized as having provided the public with edited and indeed falsified documents.
That being said, your well laid out post defining the word "Charlatan" shows "Charlatan" will indeed be a correct term when the full facts of his altered birth certificate are laid bare. He has indeed been granted "Fame or other advantages" by allowing a document to be circulated which has been tampered with. He did seek to gain "Confidence" by, ( for reasons we do not understand) having this document produced.
Lastly allegations of Forgery are no longer Allegations. This document Has Been Altered. Any alteration to an official document is FORGERY. The question which remains is "why" was it altered, and in how many ways.
"Forgery is the process of making, adapting, or imitating objects, statistics, or documents with the intent to deceive. Copies, studio replicas, and reproductions are not considered forgeries, though they may later become forgeries through knowing and willful misrepresentations. ...........When the object forged is a record or document it is often called a false document." Wikipedia
If you add information of "any" sort to a notarized document, it then has been forged. Having a seal affixed and a signature and stamp by officials of the State is notarized.
Obama is not a religion, The Presidency is not a religion, and being a member of a political party is not a religion. You should not have blind faith in these matters.
at 17:35 on May 11th, 2011
Thank you for taking the time to comment on this story.
I always suggest, if you are unhappy with the Government, then do several things:
First, read the Constitution (Also read the Declaration of Independence as in my view they ARE go together items). Second read your State Constitution, and third, read your local county and city codes, and then drop into a few meetings to say WTF?
The laws of the land are being change in many cases on the local level and the City and County councils will assume they are passing laws "for you" and as "you would like" unless you show up at a meeting and speak your peace.
at 04:23 on May 12th, 2011
Nice
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Bob 123456 (not verified)at 18:50 on May 11th, 2011
Enough Already.
at 19:04 on May 11th, 2011
Bob,
Enough? why?
If our President HAS allowed a forged document to be released to the public, while at the same time making very forceful statements concerning his birth certificate, and while belittling others who in the past questioned it, Then it is an issue of "trust".
The document IS false, there is NO doubt, NONE.
I am concerned when any person who deems themselves an "American" would not care that their President has allowed this lie to be perpetuated under his watch regardless of where their political persuasions lay.
My story and my comments are not of a "birther" nature, it is an issue of LIES and corruption at the highest level. We should ALL be concerned when a politician does "something", "anything" wrong regardless of if we voted for them or not.
FULL accountability is the only cure to the disease of American Politics.
at 04:24 on May 12th, 2011
Not forged and we're tired of hearing that.
at 10:47 on May 12th, 2011
YankeeJim,
Have you yourself looked at any of the known (released) issues concerning the document? Have you reviewed the document at length and with an open mind and asked yourself if the concerns that have been voiced have any shred of validity?
Who is the "We're" you mention? Just you and Bob? if it meas something else then what does that term "we're" mean?
Just because you "want" or "do not want" something to be true does not make it true.
I have never stated as an argument in my stories that the actual information concerning Obama's birth are in question (Mother, Father, Time, Place, etc), But I do know they do not exist on one document in the way they have been released on this Official Forged Birth Certificate.
I understand wanting to defend your President, or any person you hold in esteem, but I suggest you do not do so blindly. I suggest everyone take the time to hear the arguments of those who disagree with your views on a subject, take the time to look at the opposing view point and all its merits (or lack of merits) before you form a personal opinion and stance on each individual matter.
Being tired of hearing the document is a fake will not make the fact that it has been altered in many ways go away.
at 11:17 on May 12th, 2011
Yes, thoroughly and reported about it. Initially, I wanted evidence, and eventually we got it.
at 11:48 on May 12th, 2011
YankeeJim,
I have went back and read your reports.
No offense to you intended, but your reporting was never questioning of the issues or facts surrounding Obama's birth certificate.
In your story "Proof of Birth in the USA" you state "Obama is grandfathered in to stay. Hooray!" Such a statement can be viewed by many as being a blind oath of loyalty to one side of this issue, and not true and unbiased. (yes, I know it was an opinion piece)
Here is the issue. Lets say that all the information in the Obama birth certificate released as a PDF does exist on one typed document exactly as seen from 1961, regardless (though much less important) The PDF has been altered. It has been tampered with in many ways. The document in the PDF has been released as "official" but it is an altered document even if it was only done to "make it look nice".
So in a discussion conceding the points in the paragraph above, we are left to ask WHY? Why not just release the document "As Is" ?? Is there a single good reason ?? are there many somewhat good reasons?? I personally do not think so.
Lastly YankeeJim, I do find some question ability to claims made by people that they have "researched" this issue at great length. My centrist nature can not find any way in which someone could walk away from an hour or two hour session of scrutinizing this document (birth certificate) with known methods and not be left in a state of un easy doubt. Does doubt mean absolute condemnation, NO. However, reasonable doubt is one of the founding principals of our judicial system (both in pursuit of a charge of guilt and then in judgment of innocence).
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Doc Vega (not verified)at 07:11 on July 21st, 2011
You must be one of many disinformation anti journalists hired by the Obama administration to uphold his deception and horrid leadership. Either that or you are sorely misguided in your perception of reality and will readily rationalize anything this fraud and criminal does under the guise of being our president. People like you utterly amaze me.Obama has had his personal records, health records, academic records, as well as birth certificate sequestered from public access or altered and thus falsified. It is obvious that a very well organized and well financed effort to get this usurper elected has been undertaken with a staggering degree of intelligence agency efficiency and secrecy.Barack Hussein Obama is subject to criminal violations on many fronts and should be prosecuted according to such. People like yourself who couldn't see the difference between night and day if you got optical surgery are doing a great disservice to others by misleading them and perpetuating the myth of Obama's eligibility and his allegiance to this country.My God man are you deaf blind and dumb when you can't see the damage that this inept fool has done to the republic? Obama will have the distinction of being the worst president in America, as well as the most inept and radical leftist to ever occupy the oval office, and here you are defending him? Are you daft, man? Don't blame the total incompetence of Obama on bush either. During that administration we had 7 out of 8 years of economic growth and high levels of employment. The very economic breakdown that you ignorant lefties blame Bush for was brought on by the actions of Christopher Dodd, Franklin Rains, and Barack Obama among other Democrats who made a mockery of credit approval so that blacks could qualify for mortgages they never should have been given so that massive defaults would occur that would also cause the collapse of mortgage backed securities and bring down the greedy banking institutions along with it.Your Obama walked away with a nice bonus of over 100,000 for merely presiding over the eventual bankruptcy of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2004 and 5 prior to the impending collapse. He and his Democrat buddies all assured the country that the two failing mortgage giants were financially solvent when in truth they knew otherwise. Obama is a corrupt liar and opportunist who was elected and groomed to destroy the US, and fools like you are oblivious to the obvious facts!
at 21:36 on May 11th, 2011
Just wait till Donald Trump finds out !
- Sign In or Join to post comments
A Son Of Liberty (not verified)at 23:25 on May 11th, 2011
U.S.C. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 � 1001.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, WHOEVER, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully�
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by ANY trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or USES any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party's counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to�
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
at 04:25 on May 12th, 2011
What's the charge? Where's the proof?
at 11:08 on May 12th, 2011
Ok, I'll bite on this one... though a bit premature and a bit outside the scope of my article....speaking before I should, not having read this section of Code and what falls before it and after it......I would say that with what I have personally uncovered concerning the Birth Certificate, and what I have seen that has been uncovered that he is "literally" guilty of this Code in the following sections:
A 1) ALL 2) ALL 3) ALL a) X b) - c) yes 1) Yes - If asked to submit this document and he does. 2) Yes - If asked to submit this document and he does.
The charge is the birth certificate has been altered (1) and statements have been made about the birth certificate by the President, in support of the birth certificate are also false (2), and he has known these document to be altered (3)
at 11:18 on May 12th, 2011
What did the FBI say when you presented the case?
at 11:54 on May 12th, 2011
What?
What is that supposed to mean YankeeJim?
First, I will say I have never been involved in any way up to the typing of this post in submitting the findings I have seen made or the findings I have made to a legal authority or body.
Secondly, Even if I was to submit something to the FBI and was ignored, what exactly would that mean?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
CAES (not verified)at 03:19 on May 12th, 2011
DEMOCRAT BARACK HUSSEN OBAMA
-
ILLEGAL ALIEN
- Sign In or Join to post comments
CAES (not verified)at 03:52 on May 12th, 2011
DEMOCRAT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
-
ILLEGAL ALIEN
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Global Debacle (not verified)at 05:41 on May 12th, 2011
Cybernazis don't care about what is happening to ordinary Americans as a result of the fact that America no longer as REAL elections but gets to choose between presidential candidates who are BOTH chosen by our Mil-Intel-Oil-Banking Cartel of oligarchs. Cybernazis don't care, because they are getting paychecks from the Cartel's hired lackeys, the defense contractors. Aint' that right, YankeeWimp?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Mary Jacobs (not verified)at 08:43 on May 12th, 2011
We ought to question the Obama “Certificate of Live Birth”. It contains a forged signature. The mom’s signature has been tampered with. You can see this for yourself, simply by zooming in on the certificate on the government web site. www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf You will see that the “Ann D” part is handwritten and the “unham Obama” part has been drawn in by someone else on the computer. Here is a reference to this: www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/09/internet-engineer-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate-a-forgery/ “Additionally, if you zoom in using Acrobat with your browser on a lot of the text, you’ll notice that it appears jagged and a single color. That’s not original. A pen doesn’t write in a single color; as you write lighter, the color is lighter; as you press harder, it’s darker than everything else. So writing in pen is not a single solid color, and when it scanned, anti-aliased, which means that the square pixels on the edges fade to make it appear smooth. Most of the text in the document including a large portion of the signatures is just a single blotch of color. The likely explanation is that someone just drew them in using a tool similar to “pencil” in Adobe Photoshop.” Here are a few videos that demonstrate this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY&feature=related www.youtube.com/watch?v=JT0Tpf1IhxA&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_326068 www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW_PWzhgvDs&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_899673
at 09:04 on May 12th, 2011
Also at NowPublic:
Birtherism: An Antidote/Sedative for the Obama Administration
Source: my.nowpublic.com
at 11:20 on May 12th, 2011
They are in a "do loop."
at 11:57 on May 12th, 2011
Not sure how this 'official' document birth certificate is still somehow illegal. If it was forged or fake, I would think someone would still step forward and say so.
As for any further argument concerning this issue, until someone 'officially' proves it is forged or fake, this discussion has no basis.
at 12:09 on May 12th, 2011
The 1,
I disagree completely with the concept you purpose.
If a discussion can only exist with the basis of proof then proof can never be obtained.
However, I agree that until a large body of proof exists the nature and tone of a discussion should fall short of complete condemnation and accusation. Statements of absolute in these cases should be avoided. Preface claims with "alleged" "possible" etc.
In the heat of debate I can forget to pull back to a neutral wording, and I apologize in advance if I fail in choosing when and where to add these qualifiers.
The only thing I know as an absolute is the released document of birth Has Been Altered. (ie: is therefore a forgery by default, it being an official document with an afixed seal) It i not an original 1:1 scan.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Doc Vega (not verified)at 11:18 on July 24th, 2011
With a mountain of evidence pointing to the undeniable conclusion that President Obama has falsified his Certificate of Live Birth, exhibited before the entire US on live TV to see, lied when he said that he made special arrangement with the state of Hawaii, has had his academic records at several schools he supposedly attended locked down, that no one from that era who attended classes alongside him remembers him after the interview of 400 former students, that he has locked down his health records, and that Obama had paid over a million dollars to a legal firm to field all challenges to his eligibility should raise en eyebrow, but instead we get a continued cover-up and the insult of anti journalists like Karen Hatter calling this a birther antidote is emblematic of denial, liberal arrogance, and an obvious indicator of corruption that reaches far up into the upper echelon of government and even to a shadow group who influence events hidden from the common knowledge of the general public. This is one of the most insidious plots ever conducted against the American people in history and stands to incriminate both Democrat and Republican figures who were in obvious complicity when they falsely vetted this usurper, this impostor, this traitor, to act as President of the United States Of America, and we have a leftist media more than willing to perpetuate this myth and support the degeneration of our republic into a socialist regime against the will of the majority of Americans. The evidence is clear, abundant, and simple, yet our cowardly judicial system refuses to prosecute the law, and Congress refuses to admit the obvious as it would implicate many members who knew. Thomas Jefferson advocated a periodic cleansing of the government that could result in bloodshed from patriots and the corrupted ruling class so that our nation would survive the onslaught of opportunists and demagogues yet we are too timid and civilized to exercise such necessary purging. As a result, this is what our nation has degenerated into, a massive entitlement state and a mockery of the very Constitution that guaranteed every citizen rights and protection from government tyranny. How I weep for the blood, sweat, and tears sacrificed by our forefathers for the blind sheep that now graze on the pastures of modern day America!