is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Obama on Clarence Thomas
August 18, 2008 Wall Street Journal
Barack Obama likes to portray himself as a centrist politician who wants to unite the country, but occasionally his postpartisan mask slips. That was the case at Saturday night's Saddleback Church forum, when Mr. Obama chose to demean Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Pastor Rick Warren asked each Presidential candidate which Justices he would not have nominated. Mr. McCain said, "with all due respect" the four most liberal sitting Justices because of his different judicial philosophy.
Mr. Obama took a lower road, replying first that "that's a good one," and then adding that "I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas. I don't think that he, I don't think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretation of a lot of the Constitution." The Democrat added that he also wouldn't have appointed Antonin Scalia, and perhaps not John Roberts, though he assured the audience that at least they were smart enough for the job.
So let's see. By the time he was nominated, Clarence Thomas had worked in the Missouri Attorney General's office, served as an Assistant Secretary of Education, run the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and sat for a year on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's second most prominent court. Since his "elevation" to the High Court in 1991, he has also shown himself to be a principled and scholarly jurist.
Meanwhile, as he bids to be America's Commander in Chief, Mr. Obama isn't yet four years out of the Illinois state Senate, has never held a hearing of note of his U.S. Senate subcommittee, and had an unremarkable record as both a "community organizer" and law school lecturer. Justice Thomas's judicial credentials compare favorably to Mr. Obama's Presidential résumé by any measure. And when it comes to rising from difficult circumstances, Justice Thomas's rural Georgian upbringing makes Mr. Obama's story look like easy street.
joellerose
Orlando, Florida, United States
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 17:03 on August 18th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Glad you got the HL tool to work too!
at 18:29 on August 18th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 20:10 on August 18th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff. Why does everybody think this 'Precious' person with such an unremarkable background and record is so remarkable? (not talking about Thomas)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Jeefff (not verified)at 22:48 on August 18th, 2008
Dont care, why not have fun on my site
at 23:05 on August 18th, 2008
It's politics. Here in the Uk we are used to these adversorial insults - we see them in the House of Commons at almost every PM Questions - some have it off to a fine art and only rarely does an insulting comment lead to any widespread condemnation - this stuff from Obama is mild but he should watch his step a little perhaps when it comes to throwing out insults even when it at a perceived right wingish reactionary that will bring smiles from some liberals - he needs to get at least some of the middle right vote to ensure becoming President - this isnt the way to do it.
at 23:41 on August 18th, 2008
joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff. I'm no fan of Clarence Thomas, but I don't know that he should have been singled out for criticism more than other conservative justices.