Obama Endorses Two-State Solution for Arab-Israeli Conflict

by nyctuber | February 6, 2009 at 11:14 am
229 views | 6 Recommendations | 3 comments


By Mohamed Elshinnawi
Washington
06 February 2009

Shortly after a Gaza ceasefire went into effect between Israel and the Islamic group Hamas, President Barack Obama sent his Middle East envoy to the region to kick-start a process to end the decades-long Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Special envoy George Mitchell cautions that reaching a peace agreement will be very difficult
US special envoy George Mitchell cautions that reaching a peace agreement will be very difficult

The effort will focus on the so-called "two-state solution," which would establish a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip coexisting peacefully alongside the Jewish state.  

"Lasting peace requires more than a long cease-fire, and that's why I will sustain an active commitment to seek two states living side by side in peace and security," Obama said.

Obama sent his special envoy, former Senator George Mitchell, to the region for talks with Arab and Israeli leaders. In Jerusalem, Mitchell said reaching a peace agreement will be tough.  

"The tragic violence in Gaza and in southern Israel offers a sober reminder of the very serious and difficult challenges and, unfortunately, the setbacks that will come."


Attempts to evacuate small settlements in the West Bank have sparked violence between Israeli troops and settlers who refuse to leave
Attempts to evacuate small settlements in the West Bank have sparked violence between Israeli troops and Jewish settlers who refuse to leave

Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank constitute one of the toughest problems on the way to peace.  

Some 200 thousand Jewish settlers live there. Most would have to be relocated in Israel proper, under the usual view of the two-state solution.

But Israeli attempts to evacuate some small settlements have sparked violence between Israeli troops and settlers who refuse to leave.  

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has said Israel is willing to remove 60 thousand West Bank settlers for peace, a small fraction.


Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu has said he will not ask settlers to leave the West Bank
Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu has said he will not ask settlers to leave the West Bank

Israeli elections in February could make Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu the next prime minister. He says he will not ask any settlers to leave the West Bank. In November, he suggested he is not for a two-state solution.  
"I think that rather than build peace exclusively from the top down with political agreements, we have to add to the political process building peace from the bottom up by making the lives of our Palestinian neighbors a lot better so they have a stake in peace," Netanyahu said.


James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute in Washington,says Obama must get tough with Israel on West Bank settlement
James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute in Washington, says Obama must get tough with Israel on West Bank settlement if peace is to be achieved

James Zogby is president of the Arab American Institute in Washington. He says Obama must be tough with Israel on West Bank settlement and the continuing occupation if a solution is to be found.    

"Certainly, they [the Israelis] are not going to move unless they are moved, and they are not going to be moved unless the U.S. president says, 'This must end,'" Zogby said.

On the Palestinian side, there are also problems. Palestinians are divided between Fatah, the moderate faction running the West Bank, and Hamas, the militant group that rules in Gaza and refuses to renounce violence. Israel and the United States refuse to engage with Hamas.  

Many Israelis and Palestinians are now questioning whether the two-state solution is still possible.  


Palestinian author Ali Abu Minnah advocates one bi-national state as an alternative to the two-state solution
Palestinian author Ali Abu Minnah advocates one bi-national state as an alternative to the two-state solution

Ali Abu Minnah is a Palestinian author living in Chicago. He advocates a one-state solution, in other words, a bi-national state.

"The two-state solution is neither available nor stable nor just, and this is why we have opened the discussion," he said.

A one-state solution is rejected by Israel because Jews would soon become a minority.  

William Quandt worked in the Carter administration in the 1970s and was involved in negotiations that led to the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty of 1979. He says the two-state solution is the only hope.

"I think the two-state solution comes back into focus for us because there is no good alternative in terms of a negotiated solution," the University of Virginia professor said.

Zogby says Arab states should help with reconstruction in the Gaza Strip and with Palestinian nation building, and also offer Israel incentives for peace.

As Mitchell himself made clear, the task will neither be easy, nor will progress happen overnight.

But the new U.S. administration seems engaged where the previous one was not.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
158

Very good story.  Thanks for this.

I hope he has better luck than the past 8 presidents.

2
Roy C

Strangely enough, George "H.W." Bush was the most objective, and wasn't afraid after wining the Gulf War to require something more from the Israelis.

The Palestinian state should be contiguous, and Clinton's plan was properly rejected as a pathwork quilt, really a group of "homelands" with connectiong corridors.

To get the moderates completely on your side, the Israelis need to do the deal, but I think that my pessimism about Hamas and others similar is correct, Moonwolf, and that remains another problem.

Radicals on both sides provide justification for the radicals. Breaking the cycle is very, very difficult.

1
Emilio Lizardo

It is quite evident the Israeli's continue to desecrate their own honor and the memory of all those who perished in the Holocost by perpetrating yet another holocost on the Palastinian People.

Are the Israelis thinking that just because they have nukes they can commit unlimited atrocities of ever greater degree upon the their land's indigenous populations without any regard for world opinion or the fundamental tenets of morality ?

Have they taken their example from another age ? That of the Europeans who decimated aboriginal North American peoples to found the United States, and before that the nations of South America and Mexico ?

If so, they have forgotten we all now live in the global village of instantaneous communications. Everybody can see what has happened already and what is likely to continue happening.

The jig is up - the emperor has no clothes !

It is time now to finally end the madness ...

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

158
First Flagged at 12:29 PM, Feb 6, 2009 by 158

Related Stories

Recommendations (6)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from