Obama Executive Order Will fund Embryonic Stem Cell Research

by Albert Milliron | November 10, 2008 at 06:15 pm
3677 views | 3 Recommendations | 17 comments

Videos

Regular Session Illinois Senate Transcript With Commentary And Analysis

see larger video

sourced by Albert Milliron

 Regular Session Illinois Senate Transcript With Commentary And Analysis

Photos

For the Death Penalty?  Vote Obama

For the Death Penalty? Vote Obama

see larger image

uploaded by Albert Milliron

Conservatives had concerns about Obama's views on Abortion and Embryonic Stem Cell Research but thought that any change would have to be approved by Congress.  Not the case as President Elect Obama has stated that one of his first acts as President will by by executive order.  He will fund Abortion and Embryonic Stem Cell Research with American Tax dollars.  Americans who have moral issues will be forced to fund these programs.

The Authority of the President to issue executive orders is wholly based on Article II of the U.S. Constitution.  The President's power is limited by Article II.  The President's authority to issue an executive order cannot interfere with any other branch of Governments authority.  Funding the government and it's programs through taxation are left for Congress and Congress only.  President Barack Obama may meet his first Constitutional law issue.

A couple of Questions for the reader to consider

1. Is it right to force folks with religious issues to fund Abortion or Embryonic Stem Cell Research? 

2. Is it appropriate for a President to change how taxes are spent  by executive order?

Members of the team Barack Obama has put together confirmed over the weekend that the incoming president will immediately overturn executive orders President Bush put in place as soon as possible after he takes office. The Bush orders have protected taxpayers on key pro-life issues.

The advisors confirm the concerns pro-life advocates had during the presidential election campaign.

They indicated Obama would overturn a Bush policy that prevents forcing taxpayers to fund groups that perform or promote abortions in other countries. Known as the Mexico City Policy and first instituted during the Reagan administration, President Bush expanded the policy to make sure no State Department funding goes to the pro-abortion groups.

Obama would also overturn President Bush's policy against funding any new embryonic stem cell research.

Put in place in August 2001, the policy prevents taxpayers from paying for new embryonic research that involves the destruction of human life. Bush directed most of the public funding for the science to adult stem cells, which are more ethical and have proven more effective than their embryonic counterparts.

Embryonic stem cells, in addition to including the destruction of days-old unborn children, has yet to work in humans because of significant problems after they are injected into the body -- ranging from the growth of tumors to immune system rejection issues.

The Washington Post reports that the transition team members are working with top special interest groups and leading pro-abortion members of Congress on prioritizing the executive orders that Obama will reverse.

President Bill Clinton overturned the Mexico City Policy on his first day in office and the reports indicated Obama will too.

Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion business, told the Post that she expects Obama to rescind the protections on taxpayer-funded abortions and abortion counseling immediately after his inauguration.

"We have been communicating with his transition staff" almost daily, Richards said. "We expect to see a real change."

Not worried about those issues?  Your pet issue may be overturned by one strike of the pen as well. Obama will  target Bush executive orders in hisfirst days in office

Transition advisers to President-elect Barack Obama have compiled a list of about 200 Bush administration actions and executive orders that could be swiftly undone to reverse White House policies on climate change, stem cell research, reproductive rights and other issues, according to congressional Democrats, campaign aides and experts working with the transition team.

A team of four dozen advisers, working for months in virtual solitude, set out to identify regulatory and policy changes Obama could implement soon after his inauguration. The team is now consulting with liberal advocacy groups, Capitol Hill staffers and potential agency chiefs to prioritize those they regard as the most onerous or ideologically offensive, said a top transition official who was not permitted to speak on the record about the inner workings of the transition.

In some instances, Obama would be quickly delivering on promises he made during his two-year campaign, while in others he would be embracing Clinton-era policies upended by President Bush during his eight years in office.

Update: Friday, March 06, 2009 - As Politisite reported  in November 2008,  President Obama on Monday will overturn a policy limiting federal funds for embryonic stem cell research, officials say.

Other Related NowPublic Coverage:

Obama 'to reverse Bush decisions'

Obama's Plans for Health Care Reform: New FDS, Stem Cell Law Veto

Obama: 600 Million Dollars Later Is the Question Still Above Your Pay Grade?Obama's Health Care Plan Covers Abortion, Requires Tax-Funding

Recommended Reading:

Executive Orders 101

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Terri Potratz

I also wrote a story related to this earlier - Obama's Plans for Health Care Reform: New FDS, Stem Cell Law Veto

0
Albert Milliron

I will add your story to the body.  With the amount of views you received, it appears more people are concerned about Sarah Palin's Clothing then The life of the unborn.  Why am I not surprised?

Just to clarify, there is not ban on stem cell research in America.  The ban was for Embryonic stem cells and the ban was on Government funding.

1
dunkelberg

GOOD GRIEF!

Just how many of Boy George's many executive orders were debated?  He has ruled by fiat for almost eight years.  At most, this is undoing the damage he and his henchmen have done to the constitution.

As for stem cells, it will be nice to have science, rather than superstition, guiding health policy for a change.

Boy George got a free ride most of his time in office.  Now, someone has to go in and muck out the Oval Office.


1
Albert Milliron

superstition or not, Americans are not for these actions.  Like I stated Abortion and Embryonic Stem Cell research are not illegal in America.  What was banned was my tax dollars being used to fund them.  The argument is whether a president has authority to change tax law.  Last time I checked that was left only to congress.  You would think that with all the complaints about overstepping bounds that the new President would take the high road and lead by example. Good grief indeed!

1
dunkelberg

So, you are saying Boy George's unilateral action, without congressional debate, concerning tax funds is ok because you agree with it.  Obama overturning that tax policy by fiat is not OK because you are against it.

Also, I question your claim that the majority of Americans are against. it.  Even so, having the majority of people against a policy never seems to a hindrance to those who support that policy, be it science fiction health care or absurd wars.  If Boy George had done more things that the polls showed American voters supported, McCain just might be measuring the drapes right now.

1
Albert Milliron

By banning no tax funds were used.  If you would like to comment here, stick to the facts and try not to be condescending.  Until he is out of office it would be nice if you could refer to him as President Bush or Bush.  Notice we don't use names like that for Obama here

1
dunkelberg

Beg pardon, but I was sticking to the facts. 

You are defending setting tax and appropriation policy by executive fiat by attacking setting tax and appropriation policy by executive fiat.


1
Tax Dollars

I agree with you.  I never wanted my tax dollars to go towards any type of abortion.  People use many excuses to justify abortions.  All excuses make me sick; however, the one that disgusts me the most is the choice of having an abortion after rape.  Now, I would agree to have my tax dollars used to convict the rapist.  Rape is wrong and anyone who commits this crime should be punished.  However, murder is wrong too.  Two wrongs have never made a right!  Just because someone else commits a crime, does not give the right to commit another crime.  The rapist usually gets a slap on the hand whereas murder can end up in death penalty or at least a life sentence. Abortion is murder!

Sincerely,

Denise (take it from a person who has a daughter who was raped and did not have an abortion...although it was left up to her,,,she said it was God's choice not hers)



0
Albert Milliron

Thank you for your comment.  I just brought up this story to see how correct I was on Obama's Executive orders.  It appears I was spot on this time.

1
Terri Potratz

I think it's important not to sensationalize what was actually said by Podesta.  You're saying Obama's executive orders will fund abortion and embryonic stem cell research, and I see nothing to that effect in the transcript of the interview which all of your above references are citing:

PODESTA: Well, I'm not going to preview decisions that he has yet to make. But I would say that as a candidate, Senator Obama said that he wanted all the Bush executive orders reviewed, and decide which ones should be kept, and which ones should be repealed, and which ones should be amended.

And that process is going on. It's been undertaken...

WALLACE: Can you give me an idea of a couple of areas that...

PODESTA: Well, I think across the — I think across the board...

WALLACE: ... could be — like, for instance, stem cell research, he could end the federal restriction on that by executive order, correct?

PODESTA: I think across the board, on stem cell research, on a number of areas, you see the Bush administration even today moving aggressively to do things that I think are probably not in the interest of the country.

They want to have oil and gas drilling in some of the most sensitive, fragile lands in Utah that they're going to try to do right as they — walking out the door. I think that's a mistake.

But I think that we're looking at — again, in virtually every agency to see where we can move forward, whether that's on energy transformation, on improving health care, on stem cell research.

There's a lot that the president can do using his executive authority without waiting for congressional action, and I think we'll see the president do that to try to restore the — a sense that the country is working on behalf of the common good, that we're going to try to restore wages, give people the right kind of ways that they can build on their own lives, and when they work hard that they'll be rewarded for it.


1
Albert Milliron

Terri

Podesta is not the only one making these statements.  Fox was not his only interview.  Why would he use the examples and not have them in target for EO?    I don't think I am reading anything into the recent interviews he has given


0
dunkelberg

Hear!  Hear!

0
Albert Milliron

Terri,

Now that the election is over, my analysis of what President Obama would do has come to fuition.  The FDA began stem cell research the day after Obama became President and the Mexico City clause was lifted the day after the Roe v. Wade anniversary.

2
Fairbanks

2. Is it appropriate for a President to change how taxes are spent  by executive order?

In so far as it concerns Federal property, which these particular lines of embryos are, yes. 

0
Albert Milliron

The embryos will be bought with my tax money. 

0
Dan_S_71

To all those who are complaining about the number of EO's written by Bush, are you saying two wrongs make a right?  Or are you saying it is OK to game the legislative system as long at is your guy doing the gaming?  If EOs fundamentally are so bad (and I tend to think they are way to broad in scope and power), than Obama should work with the Democratically controlled Congress to limit their reach and authority.



0
Albert Milliron

Update: Friday, March 06, 2009 - As Politisite reported  in November 2008,  President Obama on Monday will overturn a policy limiting federal funds for embryonic stem cell research, officials say.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 1:40 PM, Nov 15, 2008 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (3)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from