NP Rank:
Obama: Health Care Summit or a Political Stunt
Health Care Reform or More of the Same - A Political Stunt
The President of the United States, President Obama, has invited both Democrats and Republicans to a Health Care Summit. The question remains if the President is sincere in listening to new proposals for Health Care Reform or if this is a political stunt to try and jam the the Senate Bill down the throat of all concerned.
There has been the finger pointing of Democrats labeling the Republicans as the Party of No, while the Republicans claim they have been locked out of the health care debate. Both Republican leaders and right wing TV pundits have have pointed at the Democrats back room deals, such as the Nebraska deal, the Louisiana Purchase and a few other sweetheart deals for Blue Dog Democrats.
Recent Election Losses in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts
Election results recently in Virginia and New Jersey followed by the election of Scott Brown as the Senator of Massachusetts should have send a message to President Obama's Administration that the electorate is not happy with the direction the Obama Administration is going. Bill Clinton recognized this after Hillarycare and moved to the centre. As a result Bill Clinton is considered to have had a successful Presidency.
Does Obama Get It?
Both the Left and Right seem to be preoccupied lately in finger pointing. The Left pre-occupied with Sarah Palin, who in all likelihood will not run in 2012, but enjoys the limelight. I.m sure she is sitting back in Alaska this week laughing at the childish discussions about her notes on her hands and her answer to Chris Wallace on Sunday morning regarding her intentions to run for President in 2012.
Well folks, the discussion really should be the Economy, Unemployment and a way to insure the 21 Million uninsured.
Based on the talking points coming out of the White House by the likes of Gibbs, Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel, I am not sure that the President gets it. If he does, he is bound and determined to continue on a reckless course, that was rejected in three elections. You can add to that the loss of District 23 New York as well.
Republican Health Care Talking Points
Both Minority Leader John Boehner and Minority Whip Eric Cantor consider the present Senate bill as a non-starter for negotiations. Their talking points indicate that the bill was clearly rejected by the American people and as such a step by step new approach to health care reform must be taken. Both have written a letter to the White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel expressing their frustration with Obama's intent to put the Senate bill on the table.
"If the starting point for this meeting is the job-killing bills the American people have already soundly rejected, Republicans would rightly be reluctant to participate," Boehner and Cantor wrote.
Genuine Health Care Summit or Political Stunt
President Obama has been accused of breaking his promises of transparency, lack of leadership on the health care front and having his agenda hi-jacked by Democratic Congressional leaders. Is this an attempt to save face and stunt Republicans to confirm that they are the Party of NO or is it a genuine attempt by President Obama to provide Health Care to 21 Million uninsured?
Leading House Republicans raised the prospect Monday night that they may decline to participate in President Obama's proposed health-care summit if the White House chooses not to scrap the existing reform bills and start over.
In a letter to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (Ohio) and Minority Whip Eric Cantor (Va.) expressed frustration about reports that Obama intends to put the Democratic bills on the table for discussion at the summit, which would be held Feb. 25.
"If the starting point for this meeting is the job-killing bills the American people have already soundly rejected, Republicans would rightly be reluctant to participate," Boehner and Cantor wrote.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
cconyersjr
Nyack, New York, United States
Recommendations (58)
-
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
marianmo
Mission, Canada -
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (27)
at 04:27 on February 9th, 2010
He only needs a couple of defectors from the Republican ranks - voila! Bi-partisanship!
If the republicans do cave, they will pay the same price the Liberals (aka: Progressives) are paying - disinterest at the voting booth. Think they aren't aware of the reason the Tea Party exists?
at 05:04 on February 9th, 2010
With the public reaction to the Senate bill so far, I think he has to be careful how much he pushes without being perceived of not listening to the Republicans.
at 04:52 on February 9th, 2010
nice blog
at 05:05 on February 9th, 2010
Thanks utubeline.
at 05:17 on February 9th, 2010
Which of Obama's move is not stunt?Could any one tell a single move of Obama from foreign policy to domestic issues which has not been more than a political gimmic.Even if is he trying to divide Republicans on such vital issue,he won't acheive any thing even if he succeeds in his holy mission of hoodwinking masses and their elected representatives.
at 05:20 on February 9th, 2010
Thanks for commenting t k kidway:). Your comments are greatly appreciated.
at 05:25 on February 9th, 2010
Getting Republicans to the table to discuss all options is where the bi-partisan President should have begun. He did not start there because he did not have the leadership strength to stand up to his own party leaders to make it happen. They were playing checkers when they should have been playing chess.
at 05:35 on February 9th, 2010
I tend to agree with you Jim. I don't think Obama is well served by his campaign team, including his PR man Gibbs. This whole health care reform bill is really a no-brainer. President calls in Congressional leaders at the start. Gives outline of what he wants, tells them to come up with a broad outline and roughed out costing by CBO and then discuss approve what they come back with and send them back to work out the detail and pass it.
His challenge is and has been the economy and jobs but they seem determined to go recklessly ahead with this rejected bill.
at 07:17 on February 9th, 2010
Stunt or not, Karl, Republicans are already trying to set pre-conditions for their participation in the process, more predictable obstructionism.
It has been the official position of the Republican Party to block EVERYTHING on President Obama's agenda since he was elected, a fact that was recently highlighted by President Obama.
Whatever he may support, Republicans draw back their support, even when they offered the idea, previously supporting it.
at 08:46 on February 9th, 2010
Karen - where was BO, before Brown?
Any offers to work with the Republicans?
No, just Chi-town muscle tactics. That worked well, eh?
at 07:25 on February 9th, 2010
Thanks for your recommendation Karen. The whole situation is way too partisan and that's why nothing gets done. I sit up here in Canada and can easily look at both sides and quite frankly neither side is without blame.
Personally I think that President Obama let the Congressional leaders steal his agenda and that he is not getting the advice he could from the White House insiders.
This should not be a contest between two parties but an effort for the American people. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have all the good ideas, but I think they can find middle ground.
Unfortunately what happens in Washington happens much to often in Ottawa too. We don.t elect people to run a contest but to get things done. They should all be held accountable.
at 07:29 on February 9th, 2010
You're welcome, Karl.
at 08:17 on February 9th, 2010
Karl,I fully agree with you.We stupids,fools and fooled masses elect some one who rarely serves us;we are doled out plethora of promises at the time of election compaigns and after that all efforts are made to convince us that because of this or that promises could not be fulfilled.If one more chance is given,delivery is assured.
at 08:31 on February 9th, 2010
the people have spoke... but the need to speak out louder. there should be a bill to remove elected officials if they do not represent the needs of their costituents. politicians don't know how to solve problems they only know how to make laws. talk is cheap I get a feeling that this won't end well.
at 08:55 on February 9th, 2010
Manie, thank you for commenting. People can and do influence their elected representatives and thus have a voice in how this ends.
In Alberta we have a Conservative Government that has been in power for 40 years. That went to their head and they are about to have the brakes put on them with a grassroots party called the Wildrose Alliance. So change can happen.
at 10:16 on February 9th, 2010
Thanks for commenting Zoey.
at 10:32 on February 9th, 2010
Least powerful President in modern history.Great talker but way over his head as to how to actually get anything DONE.
at 11:45 on February 9th, 2010
A link to presidential actions undertaken during the first year of the Obama presidency.
The link includes memoranda, proclamations and executive orders.
at 12:33 on February 9th, 2010
I got bored looking through those. The one on Farm City Week was kinda exciting, but just a little.
Still, no bi-partisanship that i could see.
at 13:17 on February 9th, 2010
Well, like I said above, Hugh:
It has been the official position of the Republican Party to block EVERYTHING on President Obama's agenda since he was elected, a fact that was recently highlighted by President Obama.
Whatever he may support, Republicans draw back their support, even when they offered the idea, previously supporting it.
at 16:12 on February 9th, 2010
So, tell me again, on what issues has Our Dear Leader asked to help the Republicans?
Other than Dick Cheney's war on terror, I haven't seen BO - prior to Brown -even acknowledge that the loyal opposition exists, except in derogatory reference.
Now, were you a Republican, would you see any reason to help the man get his way? If his policies, his programs, are in direct opposition to you and your constituants, would you help him spend the gummit into oblivion?
Did the Liberals do, or attempt to do the same when GB was the man? Never happened, eh?
Did Obama himself, as a Senator, offer his hand to the sitting President, that he might further Republican causes?
at 11:58 on February 9th, 2010
Thank You H Tuttle for the comments and Thank you Karen for the WH Links.
at 13:14 on February 9th, 2010
You're welcome, Karl.
at 12:12 on February 9th, 2010
Good piece
at 12:17 on February 9th, 2010
Thank you Amy:)
at 09:44 on February 10th, 2010
This is a very good article. I hope the president is serious about working with the reps to pass health care. That would mean compromise but it would probably produce a better bill.
at 10:03 on February 10th, 2010
Thank you 158.