NP Rank:
Obama: ‘Let the Purge of the Intellectuals Begin!’
Though President Barack Obama refuses to publicly describe himself as a socialist or a communist, the pages of non-revisionist history books are full of details about purges similar to the one he recently launched.
Purges often work like this: When a new socialist/communist leader seizes control of a formerly Democratic nation, he takes steps to purge his government of any and all intellectuals whose beliefs do not line up with his own. President Obama appears to have set the wheels in motion for just such a purge with the issuance of a Presidential Memorandum on Scientific Integrity one week ago today.
'Let the Purge of the Intellectuals Begin!' Purportedly "designed to guarantee scientific integrity throughout the executive branch," the memo calls for director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to develop recommendations for presidential action designed to guarantee scientific integrity throughout the Executive Branch, based on the following principles:
The selection and retention of candidates for science and technology positions in the executive branch should be based on the candidate’s knowledge, credentials, experience, and integrity
The OSTP director has 120 days, according to the memo, to provide his recommendations to President Obama. That means that anyone working in the Executive Branch whose views -- on subjects such as abortion, embryonic stem cell research and global warming, to name a few -- differ from those of "Dear Leader" (i.e., conservatives) should expect to be shown the exit door soon after Independence Day.
Likewise, any conservative foolish enough to think he can land a job as a government scientist anytime in the foreseeable future -- even during a time of unprecedented growth in government -- will find himself disappointed.
Welcome to the Land of Hope and Change!
Recommendations (31)
-
Barry ORegan
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada -
RoryKearney
Manhattan, New York, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
René
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 14:16 on March 16th, 2009
East -- Wake up and smell the coffee. U R Wrong!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Ken Roberts (not verified)at 15:41 on March 16th, 2009
I could not agree more , it is time the people took teaching their children into their own hands , if we don't teach them then the secularist will . I can not accept that I was a product of a smash up of a primordial soup, so where is that soups today did it disappear with the first created being out of it ? Non sense is nonsense and evolution is non sense .
at 17:53 on March 16th, 2009
It's too bad that Christians never studied biology or chemistry in high school or university. If they had, they would have at least a basic idea of what evolution even means. Judging by the comments above some of these people have obviously received very poor educations and are trying to make up for it by using the "you just gotta have faith" argument. And I don't care how many degrees someone has. That in itself is no gauge of how educated a person is. Perhaps, taking a page from some eastern philosophies, "enlightened" is a better word to use than educated. Or maybe even "evolved" is a better term.
at 18:14 on March 16th, 2009
Interesting to see this debate turn to questions re. consciousness and conditioning –dogmatic ideologies have had their day. The root meaning of the word "bishop" is "financial controller" according to Prof. Jean Markale at the Sorbonne.
We have the technological power, the engineering skills to save our habitat from the dire impacts of our mismanagement, to cure disease, to feed the hungry, to end war; But we lack the intellectual vision, or the ability to "change our minds" –to analyze the integrity of the source of our information re. our place in the universe.
at 00:02 on March 17th, 2009
Who said that creationalism and evolution were mutually exclusive of one another? God may have used an evolutionary process to bring everything together. He may even have pulled some molecules together and banged creation into existence. The Bible does not, to my knowledge, offer the step-by-step process He used. It only states quite plainly and honestly, "In the beginning, God . . ." I see and understand that the earth and everything else in the universe prove intelligent design. All evolutionists can really offer to the conversation are possible theories regarding the methodology that God used to get the job done.
One thing the Bible does make clear is that He made each species of living creatures separate, meaning one lifeform did not derive from another. I know I never saw it happen. And if you ever see a tadpole turn into a man, don't worry. I will advocate for you to get help.
Blessings!
Mary
at 02:41 on March 17th, 2009
In a communist society such a memorandum would not be accessible to the public.
Social democracy
Socialism
Obama is a Social Democrat, there is a great difference in the politics and at this moment you are embarrassing your self when your calling Obama a socialist as many of us that under stand politic terms and know which is left center and right wing politics are amused that you have no clue but are talking political issues that show you have no real understanding of the politics involved. Please stop embarrassing your self visit the links above or look up the terms in a good encyclopedia.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
mattox (not verified)at 06:26 on March 17th, 2009
No it wouldn't.
Communism doesn't stop giving people access to information. In it's truest form it would be the most open, egalitarian, free-state imaginable. And yes, even democratic; everyone has a say in everything.
Granted, ahem, it hasn't actually worked particularly well thus far but we shouldn't dismiss it just because of that. Look where advanced Capitalism as a global philosophy has taken us? Staring wide-eyed into the economic abyss.
at 09:33 on March 17th, 2009
I seem to recall, as then candidate Senator Barack Obama ran for President of the United States, he was being described, by Right Wing conservatives, as being ".... too professorial" , seeming to indicate conservatives had some complaint with 'intellectuals'.