Obama Most Radical US President ever –states prestigious Harvard

by tikun | July 2, 2010 at 06:44 am
411 views | 10 Recommendations | 6 comments

Videos

"Obama Most Radical US President ever" states prestigious Harvard Phd

see larger video

sourced by tikun

"Obama Most Radical US President ever" states prestigious Harvard Phd

Dr. Richard L. Rubenstein, author of “Jihad and Genocide”, Harvard Phd, Yale fellow, “Distinguished Professor of the Year”, and Harvard Phd, states that president Obama’s intention is to “correct the historical mistake of the creation of the state of Israel.” Dr. Rubenstein states that president Obama due to his family heritage is extremely pro Muslim – to the point of “wanting to see the destruction of Israel.”

The interview was filmed at the recent New English Review Symposium, “Decline, Fall and Islam” held in Nashville, Tennessee on June 18th and 19th, 2010. This will be the first of several video interviews with presenters at the NER Symposium. Dr. Rubenstein discusses his presentation and states that President Obama’s intention is to “correct the historical mistake of the creation of the state of Israel.” Dr. Rubenstein states that president Obama due to his family heritage is extremely pro Muslim – to the point of “wanting to see the destruction of Israel.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
anony

Egads, someone things Obama is about radical change?

3
Hargrove

Richard Rubenstein's remarks are the equivalent of a call to assassinate President Obama.  Remember Helen Thomas, she merely said that she thinks that the Palestinians are the victims, and the Israeli's are not entitled to the land.  Within 24-hours, she did not have a job, speaking engagements, or an agent; and she's merely an old, semi-retired, powerless former reporter.  Imagine the rage that would follow the idea that President Obama's mission is to eliminate Israel!

I challenge Rubenstein to offer one word, one policy, one political appointment, originating from President Obama, that even remotely supports that lie!  It's stuff like this that makes sense of countries that have laws against slandering the government! How can we operate as a democracy when we have to dig ourselves out from under lies, and there is no truth in sight!

Rubenstein's talent as a medium is not convincing —   For those of us who do not dwell in the world of the supernatural, facts are preferred . . .

Finally, Richard Rubenstein reveals his discomfort with Barack Obama's status, resolutely withholding Barack Obama's title as President, simply calling him Obama, five separate times;  by contrast, he confers the titles Secretary of State and Dean on others, who he disagrees with, but who are white, even though their titles have expired, and he only mentioned them once . . .  Could it be that Rubenstein is trying to hide his racial animus — under a conspiracy theory. 



1
tikun

@Hargrove,


I think you owe to yourself to ask Rubenstein these questions instead of playing the conspiracy card. Remember this was a very short interview and he has written extensively on the subject. Please let us know the response you receive.

3
porkpie-hat

Israelites can no longer be sure that all their actions will receive agreement from Washington, creates fear among their intellectuals, and at risk is the $7 million aid Israel receives every single day, $148 billion since the formation of Israel. I recognize Israel's right to exist but we should stop paying these obscene amounts of aid. Israel bought 3 subs from Germany coast $2 billion but in the end Israel only agreed if they got a 50% hand-out. Which they did with Germany paying $1 billion, which is also illegal under EU Rules. These three subs each carrying 3 atomic cuise missiles are now stationed off the coast of Iran, most likely in 2011 Israel and American will attack Iran. Israeli fighter and bomber planes have been given permission to land in Saudi Arabia. America and most westerner countries had expected Israel to reach an agreement with the Palestinians by 2012, but just this week, the Israeli government have stated that no agreement will be reached by them. To allow settlement expansion on the West Bank and taking control of East Jerusalem.

1
tikun

I usually do not respond to "not verified" however one small correction. The Israeli government did NOT say that no agreement will be reached. But in fact the FM said he did not think it possible over the next two years. In fact the PM just said on friday that he wants direct talks with Abbas and will meet him where ever he wants.

2
trans-parere

IMHO what is wrong with "the Palestinian-Israeli question", is that the United Nations having agreed to, and supported the creation of a Jewish and Palestinian State have taken a 'side' and no longer work actively to ensure that original intention.

Instead of working to ensure a Palestinian State the U.N. created UNRWA under resolution 302 in 1949 and have since then failed not only the 'Palestinians' but the entire assembly of nations that makes up the U.N. since.

Most of UNRWA's funding comes from European countries and the United States. It is the largest agency of the United Nations, employing over 25,000 staff, 99% of which are locally-recruited Palestinians. The Agency's headquarters are divided between the Gaza Strip and Amman,  Jordan.


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rory Cripps
First Flagged at 6:50 AM, Jul 2, 2010 by Rory Cripps
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (10)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from