Obama’s “concrete deficit reduction proposals” he’ll fight for?

by YankeeJim | January 25, 2011 at 09:06 am
82 views | 0 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Christina Romer, former chairwoman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers has it right in take a poke at the President calling for specifics. The mamsy-pamsy  approach is no longer acceptable.

State of the Union: Deficit Reduction Plan Needed

In preparing for tonight’s State of the Union address, President Obama would do well to heed suggestions recently offered from two fiscal experts who have advised him in the past.

Christina Romer, former chairwoman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, urged him in a New York Times op-ed to focus on the need for a comprehensive plan to deal with long-run projected budget deficits.

“I am not talking about two paragraphs lamenting the problem and vowing to fix it,” Romer wrote. “I am looking for pages and pages of concrete proposals that the administration is ready to fight for.” She cautioned against immediate fiscal austerity measures that would jeopardize the economic recovery but said legislation this year to gradually trim future deficits could boost the economy by “raising confidence and certainty.”

Romer said the recommendations of the President’s bipartisan fiscal commission would be “a very good place to start.” She pointed to the need for shared sacrifice, tax reform, entitlement reform and spending cuts as well as revenue increases.

In a subsequent New York Times piece last Sunday, a member of that commission -- Alice Rivlin, who also recently co-chaired the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Debt Reduction Task Force -- touched on many of these same suggestions while also emphasizing the need for job growth.

The President should urge "immediate action on a multiyear deficit reduction plan,” Rivlin wrote. “America’s future prosperity and global power are on the line.”

A day after the president's speech, the Congressional Budget Office will release updated budget projections that will further highlight the importance of deficit reduction.”

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
Piobar

The problem with giving concrete examples of your plans is that people will hold you to them. Ambiguity is the key to never being caught in a lie. If you never say anything, you can't be accused of saying something untrue. Sadly, too many politicians see this as meaning they are being honest, and cling to this stance to the bitter end.

You also cannot be accountable for something if you do not put your name too it. If the president says "we should do this, and it will fix the economy," but it does not, he is seen as a liar, and as accountable for any fall-out from the failed attempts.

1
YankeeJim

Not by my book.

0
Piobar

I agree with you, not the politicians and senior members of various government agencies or big businesses. I do not condone the behavior, it is something which has become standard over the years, which I personally think needs to change.

Remember the days when being a good leader, whether as a politician, a manager in an office, or anywhere else, meant putting your ass on the line to protect your people? These days it seems to have become the opposite, and they put the people on the line to save their own skin... Maybe I am just getting jaded as I get older. But I DO know that the leaders who gain long term respect are the ones who put their people first.

0
YankeeJim

We got mamsy-pamsy. 

"Mama always said, if you don't know someth'n, then don't say noth'n." Forrest Gump

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from