Obama´s victory and Chávez regional leadership: an unlikely battle?

by rahul | July 16, 2008 at 06:55 am
157 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

A recent article at Christian Science Magazine ponders on the possible adverse effects of an Obama victory over Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez´s regional leadership. By consulting local opposition leaders only, it comes to a conclusion that appears rather dull: Chavez´s would find it difficult to continue his Imperialist rhetoric if Democrat Obama wins US Presidential elections. However, such conclusion does not consider that what could be affected the most by a Democrat victory is Plan Colombia. It is President Alvaro Uribe´s tenure in power what would be most affected by Obama´s possible revision of Plan Colombia and the commercial relation with US. Venezuelan commercial relation has remains despite acrimonious exchanges between President Bush and Chavez. Furthermore, the article wrongly forgets the participation of the Carter Centre in many political solutions involving regional legitimacy and democratic continuity. Such expertise would not change but likely improve bilateral relations with Venezuela in an Obama´s win.

  

Could an Obama win hurt Chávez? Without Bush to rail against, Chávez will be left without a foil, say analysts. By Sara Miller Llana | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor from the July 16, 2008 edition.  Caracas, Venezuela - At a recent summit in Argentina, Venezuela's leftist president Hugo Chávez said that if he were a United States citizen, he'd vote for Republican candidate Sen. John McCain (R) of Arizona. The comment was passed off as a joke – but many observers say Mr. Chávez might not be laughing at the prospect of victory by democratic rival Sen. Barack Obama (D) of Illinois. Mr. Chávez has made an art out of insulting President Bush and his "imperialist" foreign policy. His anti-Bush diatribes resonate in Venezuela and have helped insulate him from growing criticism that he neglects domestic affairs....  It remains to be seen how Obama, who has never visited Latin America, would actually shape his policies here, but many in the region identify with his mixed-race heritage, share more similar politics, and would welcome what they consider a newcomer to the Washington beltway.... Each time controversial US policies make news – such as US military aid to Colombia or free trade deals – Chávez resumes his Bush-bashing. "And every time the domestic situation worsens [in Venezuela], the more aggressive he gets," says Elsa Cardozo, a foreign affairs specialist at the Central University of Caracas.   Chávez has said that he doesn't officially support either McCain or Obama. But certainly his views are closer to those of Obama, especially on opposing unregulated free trade pacts. Obama has voted against various agreements in the region, including one with Colombia. He has also said that parts of the North American Free Trade Agreement should be renegotiated.... On Cuba, Obama is more likely to ease some of the most strict US trade and travel restrictions.  Harder to call Obama the 'devil' What may be historic for some might backfire for Chávez, however, as he has thrived on confrontation. Probably his most audacious move was calling Bush the "devil" at a UN General Assembly meeting in September 2006. In another particularly virulent speech Chávez called Bush everything from a donkey to a drunkard – not to mention a coward and an assassin, ignorant and genocidal – in the span of three minutes. "I think that if Obama were elected, that would certainly take a lot of wind out of [Chávez's] sails," says Nikolas Kozloff, author of the recently published book "Revolution! South America and The Rise of The New Left." Others say that Chávez needs Obama to win because of his growing setbacks at home. "He does not have the luxury of permanent confrontation anymore," says Agustin Blanco Munoz, a historian at the Central University of Caracas. "But if there is a better relationship with the US, Chávez will be sure to say it is because Bush is the bad guy, not because of him." It is unclear whether Obama would welcome such a relationship. He initially said he'd sit down with the Venezuelan president, which sparked criticisms of naiveté by his opponents. Later he seemed to backtrack. At a meeting with Cuban-Americans in Miami in May, he suggested that Chávez had risen to power because Bush has neglected the region. "No wonder than that demagogues like Hugo Chávez have stepped into this vacuum," he told the audience. It is also unclear how cozy Chávez would ultimately want to get, if at all. Mr. Walser, for example, says that, although his rhetoric would lead many to believe otherwise, it is not Bush who is his enemy, but anything that gets in the way of his vision. He is likely to forge forward with it no matter who is president. "He would shift his tone probably away from personal attacks to questioning US policies and engagement in the hemisphere," Walser says. But his real aim "is his idea of restructuring Latin America, to make it an independent force." So his projects and bilateral priorities would likely be the same, as would be the themes of his speeches – they just wouldn't generate as many clicks on YouTube.
 

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from