Obama says he wants to 'finish the job' in Afghanistan

by Babel-Fish | November 24, 2009 at 12:01 pm
172 views | 32 Recommendations | 11 comments

Videos

Obama Intends To "Finish The Job" in Afghanistan

see larger video

sourced by Babel-Fish

Obama Intends To "Finish The Job" in Afghanistan

Photos

More wars !!! Yesss You can !!

More wars !!! Yesss You can !!

see larger image

uploaded by whateverblg

I have noted that new equipment has been deployed to the battle front, that the armed forces have been sent much better equipment more suitable to the terrain. The pause has been set up so Obama can not only announce the 20,000 US and 5000 or so UN troops (tongue in cheek), but also how they have been equipt to win this war against the Taliban.

Look if the professional media can get creative so can this citizen journalist but at least I know where the real center point is, through doing a bit of over exaggerating on, yep on purpose, whilst I was in the forces. lol  Double your real requirement and you then get the exact amount you really need.

US President Barack Obama has said it is his intention to "finish the job" in Afghanistan after eight years of conflict there.

Mr Obama said he would announce a long-awaited decision over sending more troops to Afghanistan "shortly".

Some US media reports have suggested that the US president is intending to send 34,000 more troops.

He has been considering a request from his top commander in Afghanistan for 40,000 more US troops.

Mr Obama said a continuing review of US policy in Afghanistan had been "extremely useful", stressing that it was in the US strategic interest to make sure al-Qaeda and its allies could not operate in the area.

"After eight years, some of those years in which we did not have, I think, either the resources or the strategy to get the job done, it is my intention to finish the job," he said.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Babel-Fish

However this report makes a bold statement..

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama met Monday evening with his national security team to finalize a plan to dispatch some 34,000 additional U.S. troops over the next year to what he's called "a war of necessity" in Afghanistan, U.S. officials told McClatchy.

23,000 troops on standby for a surge.

7000 NATO troops

4000 trainers (non combatant)

28,000 US fighting Troop? 

But I am not happy about the news papers sources it could be partially creative and factual?

2
Rhonda J Mangus

It has been Obama's intention to "finish the job" to what he's called a "war of necessity"?

I can only think of the innocents that are going to die as a result of this trumped-up war.

Thanks for posting, Babel-Fish!



0
Babel-Fish

That is always the sad problem, your welcome 

0
YankeeJim

I hear it like I heard the Chinese domino theory in Viet Nam.

2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

I will be interested in the additional cost of this. Some media report it cost $1 million to send one soldier the Afghanistan.   That would be an additional 34 Billion.

All ears will be listening on how he sells this now, especially to the American public.  I think he has some hurdles to jump with Congress. 


1
Babel-Fish
Obama campaigned saying that he'd fund the Iraq and Afghanistan wars from the defense budget, but Mullen has said that the Afghan war — which some administration officials privately concede could cost $700 billion to $1 trillion over 10 years — might require a supplemental funding bill next year.

I think your find he has a years grace..

1
YankeeJim

Let's see. Does finish the job mean arming all of the Afghan women with a formal education? That just might be the trick.

0
Babel-Fish

Well it would of if Bush was still in charge, however we have a president now that wants to remove the troops but has to take them to one final big battle to do so. Other wise USA on his watch would be seen to be weak at a time when its still got to look like its strong.

It's sort of like a dentist needing to cause pain to remove a very large big tooth.

1
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

If the information from the below link is correct deployment won't start until March and not completed until 2010.

As it now stands, the plan calls for the deployment over a nine-month period beginning in March of three Army brigades from the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell, Ky., and the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, N.Y., and a Marine brigade from Camp Lejeune, N.C., for as many as 23,000 additional combat and support troops.

1
YankeeJim

Just shoot me.

0
Babel-Fish

Yep I was a bit suspicious of that, a gut feeling tells me that's creative journalism or that's what the troops on standby have been told?  Remembering some of the junk I was told and ending up in Northern Ireland after what was thought to be a drill call out.

It's to damn pat to be sure

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Susan Marie Kovalinsky
First Flagged at 12:13 PM, Nov 24, 2009 by Susan Marie Kovalinsky
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (32)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from