NP Rank:
Obama Takes Responsibility for Fixing Economy
This definitely comes under the 'change' category when compared to Bush
Obama Takes Responsibility for Fixing Economy By Michael Bowman
White House
02 February 2009
President Barack Obama says he will be held accountable for turning around the nation's ailing economy, and making sure that federal funds used to rescue financial institutions and spur growth are well spent.
Less than two weeks in office, President Obama inherited a deepening recession that began more than a year ago. But if blame for the current economic pain and dislocation cannot be pinned on him, the president says he is fully aware that responsibility for reviving the economy falls on his shoulders.
Mr. Obama spoke in a pre-recorded interview that aired on the NBC television network.
"I will be held accountable. I have got four years [first term in office]," the president said. "I think a year from now people are going to see that we are starting to make some progress, but there is still going to be some pain out there. If I do not have this [economic recovery] done in three years, then there is going to be a one-term proposition [will not be re-elected]."
The president is pushing an $800 billion package of tax cuts and new government spending to stimulate an economy that contracted at a 3.8 percent annual rate in the final three months of 2008. The bill is before the U.S. Senate, after being approved by the House of Representatives on a party-line vote last week.
Republicans blast stimulus package
Republicans have blasted the measure, saying it is laden with wasteful spending that will increase the deficit without spurring growth. Democrats say the bill will boost the economy immediately and make investments in energy and infrastructure that will promote long-term economic expansion.
Mr. Obama says U.S. banks and other financial institutions continue to be at risk of failure, despite receiving hundreds of billions of dollars in federal bailout money in recent months. The president says additional funds will be required to prop up those institutions, as well as regulations to ensure the money is not wasted and there is no repeat of the debacle.
"It is my job as president, and Congress' job, to make sure that there are some rules of the road that people are going to abide by, and that we have got transparency and accountability," the president said.
'It will take time' to correct situation
Mr. Obama added that it will take time to correct the situation, which began more than a year ago with a rash of home-mortgage defaults and foreclosures, prompting a credit squeeze that spread around the globe.
Meanwhile, the Commerce Department reports Americans continue to cut back on purchases. U.S. consumer spending, which accounts for more than half of the nation's economic activity, fell for a sixth consecutive month in December. While the nation's collective savings rate rose, incomes dipped. Analysts say falling consumer spending is an indication that Americans are increasingly worried about their economic security.
U.S. unemployment has surged more than two percentage points during the past year. A private economic research firm (the Conference Board) is reporting that job vacancies advertised on the Internet have fallen by more than 20 percent in the past two months.



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 17:37 on February 2nd, 2009
So they should take responsibility! - who do you think "caused" the problem, bush?! - hrmmmm, this has been going on for years.
Now they're presenting a nice solution to make it all "better" for you.
- do you think stimulant packages are a good idea?
at 18:09 on February 2nd, 2009
Obama is saying he will take responsibility for his administration's attempts to fix the problem. It's a quantum leap over Bush.
Stimulant package is a complex question, the economy could easily collapse, and for those who say we should just let it collapse I don't think that would be the pretty picture they envision.
As for what caused it, repealing the Depression era law against banks merging with brokerage houses definitely contributed, though a Republican Congress was in power right alongside Clinton at the time. Bush issued ZERO vetos during the first 6 years of his admin, while the Republican majority spent the balanced budget and projected surplus into a black hole. Add to that the 20 Billion per month we're still spending in Iraq.
Republicans seem to want to blame Barney Frank for the subprime mess, but Barney has only had a voice for the last 2 years. I tend to think far more of the blame belongs to the FOURTEEN YEARS of Republican Congressional majority
at 18:21 on February 2nd, 2009
Very good article.
Obama will be held accountable in elections, in 2010 and 2012 by the voters.
The economy will be the biggest factor in how people vote.
at 19:13 on February 2nd, 2009
Both the republicans through their permitting of the rescinding of the laws passed in the 1930s to keep up from having another 1929 type meltdown and the democrats for going along, as well as insisting on "green-lining", forcing banks to make loans to other-wise unqualified people, coupled with Reagan's appointee Greenspan for loosening the money spigot and all of them for allowing so-called "Free Trade" with countries that manipulate their currencies causing our tremendous trade deficits are responsible.
Sorry for the longish sentence. They both stink and so far I haven't seen any insight into the underlying problem coming out of the Obama administration.
Barney Frank shut down an investigtion into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac where his lover worked and he has been in power longer than two years by far.
I give it 55 to 45 to the Republicans as fault.
at 19:20 on February 2nd, 2009
Barney didn't have much of a voice under the Reepublican controlled Congress. Only since 2006 imo.