NP Rank:
Obama Terrorist Supporter Ayers Unrepentant for Bombings; Another Obama Agent of Change (Opinion, Analysis)
On one side, there's Weather Underground bomber and terrorist William "Bill" Ayers, now nicely cleaned up by the Barack Obama camp and touted as a positive role model for Obama's mantra of "change." Then there's John M. Murtagh, who, as a child, barely survived gasoline-filled bombs planted at his family's home and in their car.
Early on the morning of February 21, as my family slept, three gasoline-filled firebombs exploded at our home on the northern tip of Manhattan, two at the front door and the third tucked neatly under the gas tank of the family car. (Today, of course, we’d call that a car bomb.)
....We didn’t leave our burning house for fear of who might be waiting outside. The same night, bombs were thrown at a police car in Manhattan and two military recruiting stations in Brooklyn. Sunlight, the next morning, revealed three sentences of blood-red graffiti on our sidewalk: FREE THE PANTHER 21; THE VIET CONG HAVE WON; KILL THE PIGS.
For the next 18 months, I went to school in an unmarked police car. My mother, a schoolteacher, had plainclothes detectives waiting in the faculty lounge all day. My brother saved a few bucks because he didn’t have to rent a limo for the senior prom: the NYPD did the driving. We all made the best of the odd new life that had been thrust upon us, but for years, the sound of a fire truck’s siren made my stomach knot and my heart race. In many ways, the enormity of the attempt to kill my entire family didn’t fully hit me until years later, when, a father myself, I was tucking my own nine-year-old John Murtagh into bed.
Young John's crime, and that of his family? His father was a judge presiding over a trial that angered Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn and members of the Weatherman, AKA Weather Underground, a terrorist group founded by the duo.
They were, they said, expressing their politics. Here's a reminder of how they chose to express their politics at the 1969 Democratic National Convention.
"..."The Days of Rage," as the 1969 protest was called, brought several hundred members of the Weatherman—many of them attired for battle with helmets and weapons—to Lincoln Park. The tear-gassed marches, window smashing, and clashes with police lasted four days, during which 290 militants were arrested and 63 people were injured.
Damage to windows, cars, and other property soared to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Around this time, Ayers summed up the Weatherman philosophy as "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents—that's where it's really at."
Kill all the rich people? But now Ayers chums around with Barack Obama, who lives in a mansion, and who is undeniably rich. But Obama's comfortable with that--apparently Ayers is OK with some rich people.
But Ayers and the Weatherman didn't really hurt anybody, the Obama supporters wail. Little John Murtagh's life and the lives of his family? Saved by a neighbor who raced to put the flames of the bombs out as they lashed the family's house and car.
Car? That thing filled with even more gasoline than what was already in the bomb? Yep, that was just "political dialogue" from Ayers and his gang, who that night luckily were thwarted by a man who used a kid's snowman as a water source--while risking death to do so.
Of course, the emotional and psychological costs that John and his family incurred living under police protection for months, they're just, well, throw-away costs. As, it seems, they were throw-away people, whose lives were only worth that price of some then-cheap gasoline and other bomb-making materials.
Among the throw-away people targeted by Ayers and Weatherman members: " ...a pipe bomb filled with heavy metal staples and lead bullet projectiles was set off on the ledge of a window at the Park Station of the San Francisco Police Department. In the blast, Brian V. McDonnell, a police sergeant, was fatally wounded while Robert Fogarty, another police officer, received severe wounds to his face and legs and was partially blinded.[21] --source, Wiki.
Throw-away people, just as facts and truth are throw-away materials in the lives of Ayers,
William Ayers, who was a founder of the 1960s and 1970s radical group the Weather Underground, told FOX News correspondent James Rosen in a candid 2004 interview that he still believed he was “on the side of justice” years after the group’s wave of attacks.
In the interview, conducted three years after the September 11 attacks, Ayers argued the U.S. government had carried out “many other acts of terror … even recently, that are comparable,” and claimed he and his bomb-planting comrades were “restrained” in their actions.
Ayers, now a professor at the University of Illinois, Chicago, served with Barack Obama on the board of the charitable Woods Fund of Chicago for three years and helped launch Obama’s political career in Illinois by hosting in his Hyde Park home an informal campaign event for the future state senator in 1995.
Ayers claimed the Weathermen were driven by “hope and love,” not despair, and said he did not think the group’s violent acts, targeting federal officials and local law enforcement officers, were “a big deal.”
Apparently, not even death by bombs is a big deal for Ayers.
I arrived in Manhattan in time for the March 7, 1970 townhouse explosion in Greenwich Village which killed 3 Weather Underground members who were preparing a bomb to be set off at a noncommissioned officers’ dance at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The bomb, a makeshift anti-personnel weapon studded with roofing nails, exploded prematurely killing Theodore Gold, Diana Oughton, and Terry Robbins.
Back up and re-read that account: the Weatherman members were making a bomb filled with nails that they intended to explode during a dance at a military base. They were, of course, fighting violence with their--violence.
Then there's Ayers' wife Bernardine Dohrn. These aren't "Leave It to Beaver" family values. Here's Dohrn on the Charlie Manson killing spree: "...Dig it. First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they even shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach! Wild!”
Just another supporter in Obama's twisted world of "change," where role models like "God Damn America" pastor Jeremiah Wright and terrorists like Ayers and Dhorn show us the road to their version of a changed America. Pass the collection plate, boys, because self-righteous hate is a pretty expensive thing, and payment, sooner or later, comes due.
So far, Obama's associates and mentors are something he's not yet had to pay for politically. He's slithered through Weatherman, Ayers, Wright, and long-time associate, now convicted felon, Tony Rezko. Rezko was found guilty of corruption and bribery.
Are you confused by the head spinning machinations of Barack Obama that allowed him to purchase a house worth $2.6 million (with a vacant lot next door that can be accessed only through the property where the house sits) for around $1.65 million? (Don’t worry, so is most of the press.)
Do you wonder why this “Agent of Change” and modern day prophet Barack Obama would have gotten himself involved with a man indicted for political corruption and fraud?
....
A 24-count indictment unveiled Wednesday by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald charges Mr. Rezko, 51, in an “extensive” fraud scheme in which he allegedly demanded payments from firms wanting work from a huge state pension fund and favorable rulings from a state board that regulates hospital developments.
Mr. Fitzgerald said the illegal activities constituted “a pay-to-play scheme on steroids.“It was a feeding frenzy. People were feeding at the trough for millions of dollars,” he said.
How extensive was this kickback scheme? After Governor Blagojevich was elected, Rezko handed him a 26 page list of people he was recommending for jobs in the new administration. Contained in that list were people being recommended by Barack Obama. One of those names was the real estate agent who handled the controversial sale of a house to Obama.
How many of the people on that list actually got a job in state government? Jack Lavin, the CFO of Rezko’s company Rezko Enterprises, was named head of the Illinois Department of Economic Opportunity. And Kelly King Dibble, who was in charge of business development for Rezko’s real estate development company, got a real plum; executive director of the Illinois Housing Development Authority.
Gee. No conflict of interest there.
....
JUST WHAT DID OBAMA DO IN RETURN FOR REZKO’S SUPPORT?
There were small things, such as hiring the son of one of Rezko’s associates as an intern in his senate office. And there were a little larger favors:
As a state senator, Barack Obama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting his political patron Tony Rezko’s successful bid to get more than $14 million from taxpayers to build apartments for senior citizens.
The deal included $855,000 in development fees for Rezko and his partner, Allison S. Davis, Obama’s former boss, according to records from the project, which was four blocks outside Obama’s state Senate district.
....
The fact that the proposed housing was outside of the district he represented as a state senator is an interesting addendum to the story. With no real political interest of his own or any benefit for his constituents, Obama (playing the oldest and most cherished of political games) rubbed the back of a man who had rubbed his - to the tune of $855,000.
Obama has denied doing any favors for Rezko. He is right. Putting pressure on bureaucrats to give a crony a contract worth $855,000 in personal fees is beyond “favor” and enters the realm of corrupt deal.
From nail-filled, gasoline-propelled bombs to bribery, Obama's associates, role models, and mentors do, indeed, mirror "change." But are bombs, bribes, and a racist pastor preaching "God Damn America" to a segregated, "Africa first" church the kinds of change America really needs?
If you think so, then camp out, now, at your local polling place to vote for the Democratic Party's new champion: Barack Obama, a new kind of political weatherman. Storm warnings ahead!
Update: the question I'd like to have answered: was Ayers at the DNC as a delegate, or as an Obama guest?
Crowd Power
-
PEP
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (18)
at 02:47 on August 28th, 2008
Just in case someone thinks that Obama's "change" includes freedom of speech for anyone who disagrees with him, here's the facts on his attempt to intimidate television stations.
"Sen. Barack Obama is warning TV stations and asking the Justice Department to intervene in an attempt to block the airing of an ad by a non-profit group that links him to an unrepentant domestic terrorist.
The spot by the American Issues Project questions Obama's ties to William Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground organization who boasted of a series of bomb attacks at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol four decades ago".
Source.
at 16:42 on August 28th, 2008
I really don't know what to think about Obama, in detail that is. All I know about the man is that he is now an American candidate for president. That's all I really need to know ...
I did look into your link, and found a couple of things I am sure you are already well aware of. As for me, since I have been more or less living in a cave for a while, it was all news to me ...
Source: sourcewatch.org
Source: sourcewatch.org
Of course, for completeness, I include the following citation.
Source: sourcewatch.org
at 02:59 on August 28th, 2008
More on Obama freedom-of-speech (let alone accuracy!) intimidation:
"Barack Obama’s presidential campaign really dislikes it when anyone points out anything that makes the Illinois senator look bad.
The campaign asked the U.S. Justice Department to prosecute American Issues Project, Inc., a 501(c)(4) nonprofit. At issue is the group’s public service announcement that seeks to educate the public about Obama’s close personal ties to William Ayers. Ayers, who helped to launch Obama’s political career, is the unrepentant terrorist who bragged about blowing up the Pentagon. Their relationship is well documented: we published an article in the June 2008 Foundation Watch that details the ties between the two men." ~ Source
at 03:03 on August 28th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's great stuff.
at 03:05 on August 28th, 2008
Hi Rhonda, thanks for the read and the flag.
at 03:27 on August 28th, 2008
You are very welcome, PEP.
at 03:06 on August 28th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Hum...
I may have to read this again once I had another cup of coffee.
at 03:08 on August 28th, 2008
Paschen, I wrote it without coffee--and now I need something to keep me going! Thanks for the read and the flag.
at 04:32 on August 28th, 2008
@ 1
You say the ad was funded by a non profit group. That is incorrect. A single man is paying for the add, and the advocacy group. He is Texas billionaire Harold Simmons. He also helped fund the "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth".
The reason the Justice Department is going after the ad is because it is illegal. It breaks the Bi-Partisan Campaign Reform Act, which prohibits national political party committees from raising or spending any funds not subject to federal limits, even for state and local races or issue discussion.
It's illegal because the "non-profit group" is actually on the payroll of one man and political money wasn't being spent to run it. The same man who helped elect George W. Bush in 2004 by donating all together three million dollars to his campaign (yes, there are ways around the $2,300 cap, such as "non-profit" groups).
at 08:22 on August 28th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Who you decide to bring into your inner circle does tell a lot about the person you are.
at 14:09 on August 28th, 2008
Yes, BigT, who you choose as your mentors, spiritual leader, and role models speaks volumes. BTW, this story made it to #1 real fast--but then got "disappeared" in about 2 hours. Surprised? I'm not.
at 08:33 on August 28th, 2008
The 1960 where a crazy era and some really crazy stuff was going on and did happen then.
RAF, IRA, FLN, ALB, B&M, and many more Terror groups existed in those days in Europe and North America like the FLQ in Canada.
Some of those people are today upstanding Citizen and have been consultant in part because they have an inside view into the madness and understand it better then others ever could. I to would hire an ex Al Quaida rather then a 4 star General that knows nothing but his arm chair.
at 10:39 on August 28th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff. Great article that attracts comments like "what's wrong with terrorism? Everybody did it." and "It's OK for Obama to shut up free speech because it's not George Soros who is funding it."
at 14:23 on August 28th, 2008
Thanks, Joelle. When I posted this one this morning, at about dawn, it didn't take long for it to shoot up to #1. But as I predicted with friends, it didn't last very long once staff saw it! tee hee Ya know how it goes, some stories last for 6 to 8 hours, others for 2 or less, and the page views and members' flags don't matter a bit. Not when staff editors flag their own stuff and each other's!
The absolutely incredible thing that keeps slipping by: the Obama camp is SO against really free speech. Either your drink their left-of-leftist Kool-Aid or you're an undesirable.
at 22:51 on August 28th, 2008
PEP, I am sorry but you are mistaken as your story went up two more stories went up with the same number of flags and comment even with higher views then this one, I was there and noticed how fast the stories where changing, not only changing but going back and forth, Your came back up a couple of times and went again.
This had nothing to do with you or Staff it seemed rather fair to me.
at 14:38 on August 28th, 2008
Anyone who doubts the close connection between Ayers and Obama and the effort the Obama forces are making to shut everyone up about it should go here.
at 14:40 on August 28th, 2008
Great link, joellerose, thanks. The theme of "shut up" if you don't worship at the shrine of Obama is a very common one these days.
at 23:16 on August 28th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff. The whole notion of 'free speech' is rendered (in it's original meaning rather than the new bastardised understanding of this word since the current USA administration's use of it to give us the practice of 'rendition') rather redundant when the only way to effectively stand for office is to have the financial backing of millions of dollars much from big single players or corporate interests. You can be allowed to say what you like but it doesn't change a thing unless you have the financial power and political swing that it brings with it. Democrat or Republican? The issue of personal individual free speech is really not an issue in this or any other recent election but it's a diversion from matters such as war, economic and environmental policy. Let the facts and plans on these and other issues take centre stage and then, through the ballot box, let the people speak!