Obama's Afghanistan Address: Excerpts

by Susan Marie Kovalinsky | December 1, 2009 at 05:50 pm
147 views | 6 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Loading photos...

Chris Matthews is on MSNBC,  along with Keith Olberman and Rachel Maddow,  giving his commentary on Obama's national address,  which was delivered beginning at 8 pm and finished just now.  

Predictably,  they are questioning who the enemy is,  what the goal is;  asking why Obama has fused Afghanistan and Pakistan in his address.  Is it true that Pakistan is the real problem?  How will this play to the American people,  divided as they are?    If a conservative  -  or let us say a NeoCon  -   such as George Will is against this war,  does that bespeak a non-partisan domestic resistance?  

While Chris Matthews pointed out that Obama might very well "find himself politically alone tomorrow"  ,  due to the fierce liberal,  independent , and neocon resistance to the war;  Rachel Maddow disagreed,  saying she believed Obama has pretty much neutralized all the opposition:  pacifying the liberals with an end/exit date;  and appeasing the Republicans by sending more troops within his first year,  and by making reasonable claims for a renewed attempt at stability in the region.  

   From the White House,  excerpts from the speech,  below:  Also,  watch live video commentary from MSNBC  and critical commentary from The Daily Beast News blog.

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

December 1, 2009

Excerpts of the President’s Address to the Nation

“The 30,000 additional troops that I am announcing tonight will deploy in the first part of 2010 – the fastest pace possible – so that they can target the insurgency and secure key population centers. They will increase our ability to train competent Afghan Security Forces, and to partner with them so that more Afghans can get into the fight. And they will help create the conditions for the United States to transfer responsibility to the Afghans.”

“Because this is an international effort, I have asked that our commitment be joined by contributions from our allies. Some have already provided additional troops, and we are confident that there will be further contributions in the days and weeks ahead. Our friends have fought and bled and died alongside us in Afghanistan. Now, we must come together to end this war successfully. For what’s at stake is not simply a test of NATO’s credibility – what’s at stake is the security of our Allies, and the common security of the world.”

“Taken together, these additional American and international troops will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to Afghan forces, and allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of Afghanistan in July of 2011. Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground. We will continue to advise and assist Afghanistan’s Security Forces to ensure that they can succeed over the long haul. But it will be clear to the Afghan government – and, more importantly, to the Afghan people – that they will ultimately be responsible for their own country.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Hugh Askew

He best hope that the "international" troops actually show up. Hope that it works, for the sake of the Afghans and the troops there. If it doesn't, he will be the one who lost the war. He does own it now.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from