NP Rank:
"October Surprise" - Linked to Georgian Crisis
Remember the "October Surprise"? A device used usually by the Republicans during a presidential election to help get the party in power stay in power.
There's an article in the Anchorage Daily News referencing an "October Surprise" which may be coming down the pike. The article references the "Georgian Crisis" which most of our press coverage seems to put all the blame for the crisis on the Russians but but on closer inspection, it would seem that the Georgian government is the responsible party in starting the conflict.
The article suggests a connection to John McCain who was in touch with the Georgian government several times a week leading up to the crisis.
Oh and Vice President Cheney just spent some time in Georgia promising them our support. Wonder what that is all about? And our Administration just promised the Georgian government a Billion dollars in aid to rebuild their country.
And as I am listening to John McCain's acceptance speech tonight, he gives more weight to the Georgian crisis. Is he trying to throw some more fear into the American people about a possible conflict with Russia?
See the article in the Alaskan Daily News to get the full story.
Crowd Power
-
merlingraycat
Ventura, California, United States



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (11)
at 04:42 on September 5th, 2008
This post is a joke, right? The term "October Surprise" originated in October, 1980 when rumors started that then Democratic President Carter was negotiating for the release of the Iranian hostages to ensure his victory over Reagan in that November's election.
at 05:31 on September 5th, 2008
Close, but no cigar.
Source: en.wikipedia.org
It is a generic term that can be used to apply to any party. Actually, it now is applied to situations that are not even elections.
at 05:34 on September 5th, 2008
Oh, and for Carter...the story is not quite the way you offer it.
Source: en.wikipedia.org
at 05:53 on September 5th, 2008
The operative words from your above comment were, "found the charges groundless". Even though Wikipedia is a source most people consider not reliable, the fact that these charges were groundless undermines whatever point you were trying to make.
at 06:15 on September 5th, 2008
Oh you mean that you got the facts wrong?
I didn't say anything was proven except that you got the historical facts wrong, both in ignoring the Reagan part of the history you presented, and in the origin.
There is no philosophical bent behind my argument.
The operative words were "you were wrong".
at 07:46 on September 5th, 2008
I've watched politics closely all my life, and lots of things happen to happen in October, as you point out (starting with the activities of a Democrat, not a Republican as the poster alleges), but the first time I heard the term, "October Surprise" was in 1980, and it was in reference to the possible release of the hostages. That it was also used to refer to an alleged plot that never existed is beside the point. The "October Surprise" never happened either, as we all know.
at 05:35 on September 5th, 2008
Interesting thoughts, but I believe this could use an opinion tag.
Thanks!
at 05:47 on September 5th, 2008
merlingraycat, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 07:48 on September 5th, 2008
dunkelberg and Paschen: Thanks for the comments. I just threw the info out there in case we had an"October Surprise" this year.
Nice to see it generated some controversy.
at 08:41 on September 5th, 2008
to Joellerose: Stay tuned for an "October Surprise" in 2008!
at 12:55 on September 5th, 2008
Thanks moonwolf. You make a compelling point!