'THAT ONE': Did 'McNasty' Remark Boost Obama?

by Scrivener | October 8, 2008 at 10:28 am
396 views | 43 Recommendations | 16 comments

Photos

Loading photos...

GET POLITICAL w/ VIC LIVINGSTON


Are John McCain and Sarah Palin speaking in code?


"That one."

With two little words during Tuesday night's second of three presidential debates, John McCain 2008 buried John McCain 2000, and his hopes of ever reaching the White House -- honorably, at least.

The climax to what seemed to be a well-rehearsed body blow, "that one" suddenly became the president-in-waiting, the only potential presidential visage left standing.

The comment was mean, contemptuous, and, it could be argued, racially insensitive. It immediately conjured up thoughts of the Old South, a world where white men referred to blacks as "boy" or "that boy," a world where white men couldn't bear to look a black man in the eye, lest he be viewed as worthy of such common social courtesy.  At least when Bill Clinton referred to Monica Lewinsky as "that woman," he quickly added the words, Ms. Lewinsky."

McCain's "that one" comment may explain why he seemed so incapable of anything more than a quick glance at Obama during the previous debate.

"That one" wasn't the only one. McCain blurted out a couple other pearls of persnickedyness during last night's otherwise dull proceedings. He condescendingly suggested to a young adult who happened to be black that prior to the financial crisis, "you probably never heard of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

Even moderator Tom Brokaw fell victim to McNasty, who was asked who he might choose as his treasury secretary. "Not you," McCain incongruously snapped back, calling to mind the phrase, "Angry old man shouting at cloud."

But do McCain's displays of pique signal something more troubling, more menacing, than the mere rantings of a crabby senior senator? His deprecating demeanor comes on the high heels of Sarah Palin's McCarthyistic slanders against Barack Obama -- who, in her view, has been "palling around" with a "known domestic terrorist."

Nor does it seem an accident that at the very moment of Palin's invective, someone in the crowd, well within the range of the podium microphones, yelled out "Terrorist!" And another voice in the crowd could be heard shouting, "Kill him!"

Whether the shouter was referring to the supposed terrorist Bill Ayers or Barack Obama is irrelevant. The point is that someone in the McCain campaign hears these responses to their candidates' invectives. Their response? Mostly, deafening silence.

Is it the silence of an insidious, premeditated evil? At what point does McCain campaign rhetoric cross the line from hyperbole to an incitement to violence? In the case of Sarah Barracuda, that line already may have been crossed.

And it wasn't just the cries of an angry crowd that got ugly. At a recent Sarah Palin rally, a uniformed police officer who was doing an introduction referred to "Barack HUSSEIN Obama" (the emphasis was his). The crowd roared its approval; but was the remark something of a coded message by an authority figure that it's now open season on the Democratic nominee?

To invoke a much-worn phrase, "Words matter" -- especially when those words may have been sanctioned, or at the very least, countenanced, by the officials of America's ruling political party.

These are troubled times; the true causes of the current economic tumult are yet to be discerned. Could there be a connection between the economic chaos and provocative political rhetoric? Are combatants in this battle for power searching for scapegoats to blame for the downturn? Is reckless political rhetoric intended to spark a class war, or a race war, easing the way for an ugly victory of one ideology over another?

Such questions may seem far-fetched. But the notion of a global economic meltdown seemed far-fetched just a few months ago. Better to ask these questions and search for answers now, before voters finally decide which side they should be on.

DID "EXTRAJUDICIAL TARGETING" BY GOV'T AGENCIES
HELP TRIGGER THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS?

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/targeting-u-s-citizens-govt-agencies-root-cause-wall-street-financial-crisis OR
http://members.nowpublic.com/scrivener


recommend This comment thread is now closed
Tina Kells
Tina Kells
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:38 on October 8th, 2008

Scrivener, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Scrivener

thx for the GS, T.

dunkelberg
dunkelberg
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:04 on October 8th, 2008

Scrivener, unfortunately, aiming for the lowest common denominator - or simply the lowest, most common attacks - has been too successful in the past.  Let's hope people wake up this time.

0
JeffHuang

I still can't believe McCain said that. Really surprising.

0
René

Oh, but that's what Obama likes to be known as: 'The ONE!' Haven't you seen his logo on his airplane? This is just more SPIN.

0
dunkelberg

Where on his plane does it say "the One"? 

Nice spin, but it's not working.


0
René

There's a big O on his plane. O for One, O for Obmama. 

0
dunkelberg

[chuckle]

0
dunkelberg

The McCain camp, along with their right-wing media comrades, want to convince you that Obama should not have decided to serve with Ayers, who was named the Citizen of the Year in Chicago in 1987 for his education work, and who is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Now, if someone was seen as an acceptable figure by business, political and education figures, many of whom support both Democrats and Republicans, should Obama be faulted for sitting on a board with the guy?

So, let's use that same logic and apply it to McCain.

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., a Democrat from Chicago who serves as one of the national co-chairs for Obama, told me on The Tom Joyner Morning Show that if we are to use the association tag as evidence of a candidate being unfit for president, what about McCain serving and working alongside people with virulent bigoted pasts like Sens. Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond and Robert Byrd?

Do we have evidence that these individuals committed specific acts against African-Americans during Jim Crow? No. But we do know that their hateful words, and willingness to uphold laws that were absolutely anti-American, did not represent the best of this nation.

Thurmond ran for president as a Dixiecrat in 1948 with a platform of maintaining segregation. Based on Helms' policies, he didn't see blacks as full Americans.

Bombing the Pentagon is horrible and indefensible. But declaring yourself a patriot while you speak such hateful and venomous words against your own countrymen, who just happen to be black, and then trying to oppress them, is just as indefensible.

So, did McCain work with them? Did he not speak with them? Should McCain have declared that he would not work alongside these men because of their past? Should the self-described maverick who believes in integrity and character have taken the honorable stance of resigning from the Senate to protest these hateful characters serving in the U.S. Senate?

No. And this is why this association argument is so weak and impotent.

For goodness' sakes, Byrd was once a member of the Ku Klux Klan, a domestic terrorist organization!

Now, if Ayers was involved in these despicable acts today -- or Byrd and his late Senate colleagues -- then it is fair game.

But no candidate should have to be held responsible for the actions of someone else that took place years ago.

I fundamentally believe that this is nothing but a smokescreen and effort to ignore the real issues we face. Nobody should care about any of this when they are losing their jobs and having their homes foreclosed and finding themselves unable to afford to send their kids to college and to get access to health care.

What I find to be more deplorable is to hear McCain advisers say they want to turn the page to anything but the issue number one -- the economy.

If that kind of talk is coming from the camp of a guy who wants to be president, then that is something to be afraid of -- not a candidate's association with Ayers, or Thurmond, Helms or Byrd.

0
Scrivener

And how about that Alaska Independence Secessionist Party chief who said he has no use for the institutions of America?  Wasn't this the same party which counted among its membership Sarah Palin's husband Todd?  The party of whom Governor Palin spoke glowingly at their convention?

Should the Dems say that Sarah Palin sleeps with an "enemy of the state"?  Now that would not be nice... or appropriate... but what's good for the goose...





master_jim2008
master_jim2008
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:29 on October 8th, 2008

Scrivener, I like this story. It's good stuff. his hopes of ever reaching the White House -- honorably, at least.

you got that right, if he wins it won't be with honor, dignity or anything else worthy of the presidency. Kinda like how Bush thinks nothing of flying that middle finger, or is that his way of saying his IQ is a 1?

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:31 on October 8th, 2008

Scrivener, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Jon Azpiri
Jon Azpiri
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:09 on October 8th, 2008

Scrivener, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Wino
Wino
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:04 on October 8th, 2008

Palin smiled at the shouts and jeers.  McCain is in trouble, time to roll out the racists and the conspiracy nuts.  What a leader!

Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 21:50 on October 8th, 2008

Scrivener, I like this story. It's good stuff.

merlingraycat
merlingraycat
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 22:06 on October 8th, 2008

Scrivener, I like this story. It's good stuff.  Also very scary.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from