NP Rank:
Organized Stalking TI's navigate truth and deception on the web

The emerging problem of organized stalking in America, Canada and in other "western" nations, isn't really that new, as it's another resurgence of a cyclical ugliness of humanity that dates back decades into the 20th century, (in pre WW2 Germany and post WW2 communist East Germany) and some believe the Roman Empire. Whatever its cyclical duration, the atmosphere which fosters its growth is indicated by an insecure population, often within a declining society or stagnant economy. It's fundamentally about scared, small minded people who can be coaxed by leaders in business and government to do their bidding and accomplish control and conformity in the rest of the population, and empower themselves with the belief that they are a part of something good.
Of course "good" is in the eyes of the beholder, or who is on the giving or receiving end of a program that inevitably becomes a fascist police state of fear and hate. This era's incarnation is markedly different from those of previous generations, on several fronts, due to technological developments. Of benefit to the stalkers, or "perpetrators", are cell phones for communicating, and it is assumed (but the extent or methodology unknown to this author) the internet for networking. As well the stalkers have purported hi tech weapons. but that is a subject deserving of an indepth analysis greater than can be covered here.
What we'll focus on is a vital resource for targeted individuals, or "TI's" as they are referred to, the research of information and social networking on the internet- for positive and unfortunately often negative results.
When a person finds their lives in the grips of an ever increasing series of bizarre incidents, they look for answers, to find the truth and perhaps retain their sanity. This author went through this process himself, over a few months' time spending many hours querying search engines with the various word combinations to describe scenarios, people, events, vehicles, scientific terms, to find information about a cruel program that the originators need to keep secret for its success and society as a whole wants to ignore.
Once a name was found, and I'll list various names it goes by right below, all of a sudden the floodgates of websites and people wishing to get their story out, turn from a trickle to a roaring rapids.
Cause Stalking, Organized Stalking, Gang Stalking, Community Mobbing, even "The Buzzsaw" (an interesting name that is quite fitting when certain actions are utilized, imagine having your existence, your world put through "the buzzsaw" and you get it) are a few names. Most of the TI community has settled on moving away from "gangstalking" as it misrepresents the problem as committed by traditional street gangs, and prefers organized (stalking) as it is the most accurate.
In this vein we lead into our first problem. TI's feel our salvation depends upon gaining widespread attention to this problem by the public. It's uncharted territory, it does not help to send them in the wrong direction when the journey will pass many unfamiliar milestones and landmarks. Even well seasoned TI's find their own body of knowledge is actually formed from less hard facts as they have themselves witnessed, and assembled from well meaning assumptions that may have even been formed from the assumptions of others. So you see without a well disciplined process of forming the accounts you relate, and it's very important that we do publish those accounts, TI's can unintentionally find themslves telling a lot of "fibs" with the best of honest intentions.
Many TI's have been "fighting the good fight" for years, even decades. Many websites exist, but few seem to have grasped the importance of reducing misinformation like Eleanor White. Rather than be tempted to sensationalize her experience to appeal to sympathy, she endeavors to keep it factual for the purpose of legitimacy to stand up to scrutiny by the media and public as we move toward a future day when it's all over the front pages. Her site at:
http://www.multistalkervictims.org
is extensive, professional and is held to high standards, as she probably realizes the public would seize upon the one oddball and generalize as the norm, rather than the exception. She's a stickler for facts, and since this author has lost count of the number of internet debates in forums he has easily won with the rather cheap tactic of seizing an obvious error or blatant lie and pounding on that weak point but their underlying position was sound, I see sterling logic there. Even her motivations seem stellar, it is more selfless of her to provide factual data than emotional rhetoric, the community of TI's is to benefit from this. I'm tooting her horn because in the limited correspondence I've had with her, she instilled a sense of humilty in me that using her philosophy as my model, STICK TO VERIFIABLE FACTS, everything I ever said or did on the internet would move the TI community FORWARD, rather than have to stumble through defending false claims or having others assume those claims by me were factual and themselves have their credibility destroyed by repeating them.
Now Public has several TI's who have done extensive reporting, its TI readers are left with a sometimes uneven treatment of the story, sometimes excellent collections of data take a back seat and are buried in obscurity by our worst case scenario, an individual interested in the world's attention toward the story, or even upon themselves, that they not only ignore the pursuit of facts entirely, they appear to get them wrong at an amazing level of contemptuous propensity, willing to say what might garner the most buzz, or commentary on self involved diversions. An example:
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilante-network-terrorizes-america?page=12
Not a lot of hard data, plenty of speculation, sensational claims alluded through weasel words to be possible facts, but is any of it?
One would wonder if a TI should make so many unsupportable claims, are they expecting that they may ever have to seriously present them as real? Or care how many inexperienced new targets are going to collect them as their own and find embarrassment and discredit when repeated? Does it appear that such an author as even been in such a position before?
I would merely assert, without patronizing Christians with blasphemy nor causing too much inflation in Ms. White's head, (no worries there, me thinks) we ask ourselves to put the community before self and before we publish, think, "WHAT WOULD ELEANOR DO?"
You'll still be serving self, because unless you just fell off the turnip truck, as individuals we are getting seriously pummelled out here. If the community does not progress we sure as hell will not by ourselves.
Crowd Power
-
batvette
San Diego, California, United States
Recommendations (2)

Anonymous users (2)


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (75)
at 19:49 on March 17th, 2009
Frankly, I'm getting tired of garbage lies by our so called "hosts" when our hosts are nothing but a parasite needing to be permanently jailed and done off with.
Fact: The Israeli Mossad & British Zionist "thug teams" run around the United States with microwave weapons, unsupervised, terrorizing people just for speaking their forsaken mind.
I've had it and I took decisive action against them forcing them to back off once and for all. The ACLU won't do a damn thing, they live in an illusionary world afraid of the Zionists and under the belief microwave energy weapons or HAARP or anything else doesn't exist.
They're useful idiots at best and total disinformation garbage at worst!
The FBI is a useless shell organization as for the most part, terrorists hollowed it out by blackmailing the operation managers so they do literally nothing.
Mr. Uzi LArad of AIPAC fame is a convicted criminal, who has been barred from entering the USA due to these deplorable games he's been a part of and being a director of Mossad.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
I'm not playing any games here. We're on the verge of total revolution I'm telling you and if these terrorists do not stop this nonsense, if they do not permanently back off, we're going to very likely raze Mossad-AIPAC headquarters; destroy ourselves & let this country die!
at 11:49 on March 22nd, 2009
at 20:06 on March 17th, 2009
Tell me, if it isn't new why do you censor your blog from posting important and repeatedly VERIFIED information?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
You claim to be looking out for public interest? Or really, tell me how that is?
When you censor repeated information and attack others who report gang stalking, that isn't looking out for the public interest that is deliberate HARRASSMENT of the public interest...
If oyu know what's good for you, let this information stay up so others can actually get help and not be led astray by nothing but tactical thugs like bav who may have an alterior motive..
Everyone nowadays gets access to their information instantly, so let that be the case, most people saw through you the moment you claimed to defend "freedom"
at 00:10 on April 5th, 2009
Honestly it's only recenty that they seem to be on a real agenda to get rid of the term. I wrote a few articles about it already, but I guess I have to write a few more. Here are two of the articles, there is at least one more about the planned witch hunt these people were planning.
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/use-what-works-for-you/
I honestly feel that trying to get rid of the term Gang Stalking is a deliberate effort to remove the progress that has been made over the last several years using the term. I really feel sorry for the new targets who now feel pressued to not use a term that is in their best interest, by others who most likely do not have their best interest at heart. Most people are not arround in this community long enough to understand how this all works. Having watched Cointelpro tactics, I understand this pretty well.
at 20:15 on April 7th, 2009
I guess, as in anything else in the world, there's going to be infighting over what direction you're headed or who is the "authority". (I've seen your page too, and posted on it a couple of times last year)
After reading your entry on "witch hunts" you've got some good points and I know some sentiments regarding "who is she to decide what's legit or not" are well founded. I myself took exception to her disregarding the significance of "brighting" merely because it's one of the few things I can probably get on film, and a near daily reminder that what's going on is not my imagination. It's not happening to her so she dismisses its significance. However you can't deny that people who we'd like to convince will look at a site with unfounded and even outrageous claims, and single them out as reason to disregard the true remainder. How many TI sites are on providers who allow ads from UFO sites, and then you see them popping up when they load? It's the "association" thing.
While none of us has a right to stifle someone's else's voice, TI's have a unique problem in that people would dismiss our story as the ranting of a nutcase. It almost makes our "speaking out" a waste of time if someone is next to us speaking out like a ranting nutcase, and I think she's just trying to address that. Overall I have a lot less of a problem with her perhaps faulty and even self righteous judgement than I do with knowing people like this:
http://blog.aclu.org/2009/01/26/internet-filters-voluntary-ok-not-government-mandate/comment-page-2/#comment-6310
(the one with the vast majority of comments) are running around shouting at the world about "our story". Read some of those fully, you could sell some of that material as comedy if it wasn't sadly going to come back on us.
As for "what's in a name" I can't speak for anyone else but I do know nobody's paying me to reverse any progress so far. "Gangstalking" may be a little misleading as a descriptive term but it does roll off the tongue a little easier than OS and it certainly does take fewer characters when I'm making a sign up, so it's just as good for me.
at 22:33 on March 17th, 2009
It appears a bit of a psy op has been going on lately here at this website.
Vic raises some significant concerns but believes its all the fault of Christains, Jesuits, White Nazis who are a part of the Aryan Brotherhood.
His disillusionment or possibly brainwashed thinking will not allow him to see past that, to see it all is a Zionist global conspiracy therefore his friends, no matter how noble are now his enemy.
Zionism is nothing less than a Globalist fascist movement. It is the belief of being higher than other human beings and able to rule them, whether you are protestant, donmeh jewish, catholic or otherwise.
Our enemies are all members of this ideological Nazi movement. The ACLU is controlled by Zionists who renounced their own Judaism, and actually do want to take over the world.
Much more can be understood at real, and serious websites below:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
http://www.ziopedia.org
The Israeli mossad, not "Gestapo" is in fact here terrorizing people including "Vic" or other jews who are opposed.
The Zionist German teams are here as well controlled by the anti-christ Donmeh of the ADL.
Ant Defamation League is controlled by very evil Donmeh Jewish types such as Vic's hero Michael Mukasey and works right alongside the Zionist Organization of America and Christain Zionist denominations worldwide. Including the protestant Zionists.
They are all very real, extremely violent, in league with the military complex plus Israel Lobby.
at 23:27 on March 17th, 2009
This comment to the 3 above: Am I assuming right you have had previous exchanges and this may be a hangover from them?
If so, be my guest, I'm no stickler for topicality and it's not far off anyway. I would even add its very relevant toward the article.What I wrote is not an informative primer on gangstalking, to educate the public, it's an encouragement to avoid confusing subjective diversions in such articles.
So in summary I'll take in the additional political issues with interest, but if this was one of those information sites I discussed (likely never be!) I'd have to throw the lot of you out for off topic discussion. (which I usually hate when it happens to me-)
So how can I tell if my perps are jews, and does it make me an antisemite for hating on them?
at 06:37 on March 18th, 2009
Thanks for a step in the right direction - thanks for being a "voice of reason." (I hope "a step" becomes a leap.)
I can't speak for others, but have to wonder if some readers are now "gun shy"/intimidated, based on past negative/harmful experiences, which have set the TI community back quite some distance IMHO. For my part, I have to "let the dust settle" a bit. In the meantime, thank you for this article.
at 10:22 on March 18th, 2009
Thank you for reading as well as your kind comments.
It might be noted yesterday in the comments section of one of the second author's articles, I saw the exact unfortunate thing my piece summarized. A very reasonable veteran Now Public reader founded his second and larger rationale to deny OS/DEW even existed, based upon a completely unsupported yet commonly repeated claim in the article. (the claim was these programs are schemes with official government involvement, no evidence exists that it is anything more than individuals within government in abuses of power doing this quietly on the side with others)
The reader rightfully pointed out if there were government "schemes" like this there would be whistleblowers screaming about it.Given their federal law protection of themselves, their salaries and many other guarantees, he is dead on. The embellishment did not help to sell the story, it instead created a sound factual reason to deny it wholesale.
The truth of course is that no "whistleblowing" is possible within reason, there is nothing written in policy, no reward for the whistleblower, only fear they would face retribution of a high price and their fate might be as secretive as the program itself amazingly remains.
(when I wrote this piece I started out with the intent of a much more negative tone toward that author, with the order of appearance being him with more content first and Eleanor last. As it worked out I got some rather warm feelings composing the positive passages regarding her work and didn't have my heart into heaping as much negativity as intended toward the end. )
This is indicative of Eleanor White's leadership on these issues:
http://www.creviews.net/
Outstanding. .
at 18:04 on March 18th, 2009
I serendiptously stumbled on the following article titled "A Vancouver Problem: Cops Investigating Cops" (by "jr", dated March 13, 2009). A group called Canadians Opposing Political Psychiatry (COPP) is advocating (with others) for "civilian investigations...in all cases in which the police are accused of wrongdoing."
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/vancouver-problem-cops-investigating-cops#comment-323178
I would be interested to know if anyone knows of a similar group in the U.S. (I located another article which might be of interest to some, but will read it before posting the link.
at 23:17 on March 18th, 2009
Someone asked of how can you tell if your perps are Jews meaning full blown Jewish bolshevik criminals.
If the people attacking wear very dark sunglasses, often dress in black and have stern faces they are Jewish gang-stalkers.
If they are more reserved and have passive expressions, no dark sunglasses, look like retired USAF types they are protestant gang-stalkers.
And if they do not identify themselves with any ID if a group of citizens asks them too, they are probably a combination of these forces meaning it is most likely a Russian Israeli Mafia gang which are much more public nowadays.....
All of these gangs are sometimes co-ordinated through the ADL Anti Defamation League as others have said or through ex-Officers.
Reporting Jewish or Italian criminal gangs does not make you an anti-semite, what it makes you is a target of B'Nai Brth and a "thought criminal" in their schitzophrenic definition.
Given as others have noted these nutcases are essentially Zionist thugs it would be in your best interest to report them to all police agencies, to the Interpol police, and to local citizens so that they are all fully apprised of their illegal activities.
The F.B.I often joins in on the "gang-stalking" since, some of the F.B.I's original directors joined in on the ADL awards ceremony with Michael Chertoff when he headed DoJ.
The F.B.I is toothless against these racist psychos, so don't bother reporting it to them as they have complained about their inability to "prosecute" Russian Israeli mob because of the extensive laws being evoked in the name of "National Security" by your own Department of State.
Good advice then: Defend your property and report this vandalism to just about anyone else besides the F.B.I so they can be intimidated, perhaps run out of this country eventually.
at 02:46 on March 19th, 2009
One thing to add to this topic and which poignantly addresses the issue at hand, is that the Department of Justice has admitted in January 2009 that organized Gang stalking is a huge enormous problem that they have been nearly powerless to prevent.
This might have something to do with their recklessness at the top, given the OLC Office of Legal Counsel memo authored by one John Yoo and Michael Chertoff which stated that "the president has the authority to call themselves king, suspend rights, and invade privacy in order to prevent terrorism..." and a caveat to that would also be
One could say that the OLC authors did the exact opposite from preventing terrorism, and instead, they subsequently terrorized victims by making it "conceivably okay" or "conceivably assured" that organized Gang stalking would be Government sponsored.
It should go serve as no surprise, that the DoJ will literally have to be embarrassed and shamed into dealing with the problem now given that Holder's criminal appointee Herzl is also essentially a Zionist globalist neo-feudal concubine, who has flatly said time and time again, no one is going to be prosecuted for ordering Torture.
We don't need to look very far to see the causes of organized gang stalking after reading the shocking Department of Justice report. Those with "contrarion views to the mobs" or who stir the kettle pot of the ADL, NIC, NSA or National Bar Association whom in the former should be abolished sometimes for their criminal negligence; get actively stalked and harrassed or even shot at by organized stalker gangs.
Apparently the law of George Orwell is alive and well in the United States. While these cases should all be prosecuted, it's going to be up to the states to prosecute them by asserting their 10th amendment rights & dragging these law breaking crooks into court themselves.
After all, our good family friends The Federal Reserve Federal Government certainly won't do it.............not without being forced to that is, and our good President Obama is ruthlessly held hostage by it as well. As they all say, in Washington the AIPAC think-tanks and Defense contractors make the rules.
And those who now see that as obvious reality, also know why the stalking must be fought; and why Chas Freeman was a hero who got sacrified on the altar of bureocracy.
at 13:11 on March 22nd, 2009
"One thing to Add said": One thing to add to this topic and which poignantly addresses the issue at hand, is that the Department of Justice has admitted in January 2009 that organized Gang stalking is a huge enormous problem that they have been nearly powerless to prevent.
I know about the stalking report that came out in January and that there was a category (count/estimate) for stalking incidents involving more than one stalker. If you could point readers to a DOJ document, it would be helpful. If this was stated in some official document, I would like to be able to access it. Thank you.
at 22:17 on July 9th, 2009
He means the DOJ report on stalking in general. There was no such admission (that I know of) within, but in their detailing of the many people who reported more than one stalker, many take that as begrudging, silent admission they know it's going on. Maybe a turning point in that they cannot continue denying it. You know this, I think his mention of it was merely taking an optimistic assumption and running with it?
One could also take that in the most negative way, since the numbers and data suggest it, and they still won't talk of it, their willful ignorance is a sign they intend to quash the matter forever.
at 13:56 on March 19th, 2009
well I can't speak for all instamces of gangstalking but I will testify that in my case I've seen no indication of any particular religious affiliation whatsoever by any of my perps, and unless one has clear evidence of it, such allegations will only discredit the cause. I can't tell you what to believe, but I can ask you why you believe it.
at 15:15 on March 19th, 2009
Probably should go without saying, that religion is not at issue since most zionists, most gang stalkers or repeat offenders are secular to begin with....
at 18:28 on March 19th, 2009
I agree 100%, though the perps themselves might somehow pervert their religious beliefs to justify their activities, I myself often refer to them as "fundie fascists". I think if there has to be a term that would describe it best, it's "ideology driven". Fanatical patriotism, hatred of gays, racial bigotry, and general intolerance of anyone that doesn't look like you or acr or think like you, are all ideologies in their own way.
It seems every example of organized stalking has as many differences as they do similarities, in the type of people doing it, why they do it, and the techniques they use, though it all seems to be pages from the same handbook.
at 21:29 on March 20th, 2009
Quote "batvette" - "...few seem to have grasped the importance of reducing misinformation like Eleanor White..."
Quote Elenore White - "Please remember Theresa "Terri" Schindler, who died of judicially mandated organized stalking..."
Oh really? I think not.
While I respect everyone's opinion, I would call that statement misinformation with a capitol M and everyone that knows who Terri Schindler was knows it.
The description of this situation as "organized stalking" is misleading at best or could be called outright fabrication. At least enough for many to write off E. White as less than credible.
As you have said, "batvette", it is sometimes easy to *punch holes* in anyone's story, but why would *reasonable* people do that, if they really were sitting in the *same boat.*
at 23:06 on March 20th, 2009
#1 I said few have grasped the importance of reducing misinformation like Eleanor White, and I stand by that, however I do know who Terry Schindler is and I actually agree with you about that issue.
(because I was more interested in OS than the right to life issue, frankly I blew it off when I saw that months ago, and didn't let it overshadow the good things I found. If that issue is of great importance to you, perhaps you should send her an email, I'm sure she'd be open minded about it.)
My declaration above does not mean you cannot find something to disagree with her on or that she is perfect. It means she IS working to keep the body of information available to the public as fact based as practical.
#2 If that's all you got out of her site, perhaps you sold her, and your own quest for knowledge, rather short, wouldn't you say?
In any case to offer that my claim was in good faith see the link in one of my replies above to her review site. I think that supports my assertion. Thanks for reading and your comments.
at 06:58 on March 22nd, 2009
Another problem that I noticed from the E. White website. Credibility?
Credibility Reviews: Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment
This site went on line November 21, 2008
BOGUS - Web site: http://www.gangstalkingworld.com, author unknown
000_002: Review dated Nov 21/08
From the link at the top of the above site as follows. Notice the site reviewed as "bogus" is listed as of this day as a resource and link to visit.
(http://www.catchcanada.org)
Resources & Links
www.multistalkervictims.org
www.gangstalking.ca
www.freedomfchs.com (very active)
*www.gangstalkingworld.com*
Cyberstalking articles by Paul Bocij (includes references to stalking-by-proxy)
www.stalkingbyproxy.com (Blog - new)
at 08:25 on March 22nd, 2009
Good observation but I think she'd just trying to be fair to them. Again I'm not claiming perfection on her part, but at least an intent on her part to impove the situation. I might also add I don't always agree with her review criteria, and she's probably guilty of something alot of us do, dismiss the importance of gangstalking techniques we've not experienced but others have, because they don't affect us.
In one case she was dismissive of one man's account due to his emphasis on vehicles "brighting" him, even suggesting its mention would cause credibility issues if promoted to the public.Shr obviously hasn't experienced it on a recognizable level, it's one of the events I see nearly daily that remind me this whole thing is not imaginary. I do live in a situation where my backyard borders the parking lot of a city park, an incredible opportunity for them to engage in such activities- and for me to have a 35w HID searchlight to sear their retinas handy should they need reminding not everyone will lay down and take it like a good little *****. (note it's illegal to actually shine such a device, equal to several car headlights, in the eyes of a driver of a moving vehicle. I fire it up and scan the park or hit their tailgates, it's plenty. They always scatter. I take a lot of photos too, and have a sign that says "Gangstalking today? you might be on YOUTUBE tommorrow!" in my window. Another says "Organized stalking is a crime, under USC title 18 section 241-(243 if you are a L.E.O.) Explain that to the kids, they're going to ask why DADDY went to PRISON.")
You know they love me for that one.
at 00:17 on April 5th, 2009
The problem is you have more than enough disinformation agents, who will run around posting articles to say that this is the exact direction we should be going in, and removing the term gang stalking and following some examples is not where we should be heading, but these people have this stuff almost down pat, and if you let them they will go the distance and find stubtle ways to remove useful terms, and more importantly useful ideologies, with good information.
The credibility reviews are nothing better than a witch hunt, a subtle witch hunt that was conceived a long time ago, for those who don't know any better whoever they will use it, and it will make them shy away from legit sites.
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/11/25/the-witch-hunt/
at 16:42 on March 21st, 2009
I've read everything E. White has written from when I first found her site years ago, about the same time she started. What she provides does not contain much if any speculation.
I respect her strong feelings about the Schindler situation. But, I have heard the same concern from others and she may already have too, it's her decision to make either way.
She did have information about police involvement or knowledge that at the time I was skeptical about. That was until I made several visits to the usual law enforcement agencies and saw and experienced some of what I have posted.
What I posted are actual events and information relayed by people of authority. Or, that can be backed up by evidence or experimental proof.
Did you try to file a police report? If so what happened?
at 01:20 on March 22nd, 2009
No,m I haven't contacted the police as I am quite lucid about the difference between looking up a code or statute and determining something is unlawful, and:
1. getting the badges, so to speak, to see it as actionable and not have it come back on you.
2. if you get past 1, being able to prove it in court.
I think the level of lawlessness depends on each case, maybe each community. My perps seem quite intent on remaining lawful, though as a childish display of (asssumed) power they seem to enjoy speeding the wrong way (against two large signs like you see on the freeway) out of a one way street to leave the parking lot behind my house. It merely identifies them to me as perps.
Even the things I can document and have on DVD recording, like, believe this: they try to terrorize me by making a wall on their side of my house "flex" or "swell" in and out, you can feel it, hear it, and I have numerous recordings of it- how do you prove they did it? At the same time often the house feels like it's rumbling or shaking, and if you stand anywhere near the wall it alternately repels then pulls you toward it- but I don't think it's magnetic.
You want to tell the cops that? Not me. My recognition of that is evidence I am not cracking up.
at 00:20 on April 5th, 2009
The scary part about the site is that it has information about Terri, which has nothing to do with this, yet she calls herself legit, she has damned the gangstalkingworld.com site because it has the adacity to list it's technique section in alphabetical order, now I ask you, who should we really be listening to?
Well yourselves, but come on, this is stuff people should examine, but don't, and they just play into the hands of those they should not.
at 20:43 on April 7th, 2009
Okay, so I went and looked at that review about gangstalkingworld, and now I have one thing to say:
Is she serious? She didn't see that they were alphabetical? Did you bring this to her attention?
That review was flippant and irresponsible.
at 02:34 on March 22nd, 2009
The thing about the wall moving is something I have not heard before.
My house has had an oscillation or vibration that was like a small earthquake when the "electronics" started. It happened after certain *events* occurred that would be necessary to make it happen.
The only reasonable explanation would be a convergence of two acoustic signals or a single disruptive frequency, as is demonstrated in the famous Ella Fitzgerald Memorex commercial. Other smaller constant vibrations happened for some time after that then stopped.
That was just the beginning and small part of the "electronics" along with extensive vegetation clearing, like others have described. I believe some of the clearing was to improve surveillance.
The chemical assaults have been constant long before the electronics started and I haven't tried to count the number of different kinds used. That is what I went to "report."
I had also reported some other fairly large crimes before this started happening. I was told that the people involved in those crimes are the ones that hired "professionals" to arrange these organized stalking assaults against me or to *flip* me into whatever this is.
Chemical attacks are felony assaults under actual laws that for some reason seem to no longer to exist.
at 08:07 on March 22nd, 2009
My house has had an oscillation or vibration that was like a small earthquake when the "electronics" started. It happened after certain *events* occurred that would be necessary to make it happen.
when you say "events" you mean like in reaction to something you did, and they do it to condition you? If so that is exactly how they work with me, one reaction of note is when I go to the bathroom, EVERY TIME they start up. Probably so that whether they are there or not, for the rest of your life you can't go to the bathroom without thinking of it.
at 09:13 on March 22nd, 2009
I mean they had to have a location prepared so I would not see the equipment moved in or in place, because I would have seen it otherwise.
And it was a very dark night, very little moonlight.
at 09:23 on March 22nd, 2009
The bathroom assaults are some really sick perverted stuff. I heard other people say they are attacked the same way.
I wonder if that is trait of the people operating the weapons or just "part of the program," something they are told to do.