Pakistan Missile Strikes, No Comment Policy, Continue Under Obama

by Tina Kells | January 23, 2009 at 08:08 am
358 views | 30 Recommendations | 8 comments

Photos

2009: White House Press Secretary

2009: White House Press Secretary

see larger image

uploaded by jbenson2

President Obama has vowed to lead the United States in an era of change but one thing that doesn't appear to have changed yet is the US military policy on Pakistan.  The Obama administration's pledge of transparency appears to be at odds with the issue of Pakistan.

Quote

I'm not going to comment on those matters...
Robert Gibbs - White House Press Secretary

In a Friday press briefing the White House Press Secretary was quick to shoot down all questions about any missile strikes in Pakistan.  When asked about reports from the region Robert Gibbs curtly replied, "I'm not going to comment on those matters... now about job creation."

When pressed by reporters to qualify this comment as a now or ever statement Gibbs clarified, "I'm not going to comment on those matters today."  During the course of the briefing several reporters further pressed the issue and raised the point that other US representatives were confirming the strikes.  Gibbs held firm to his "no comment" stand.

Whether Gibbs or the White House care to comment or not, reports from the North Waziristan region continue to suggest that a double missile strike has occurred and that injuries and fatalities have resulted.

CNN reports that 2 missiles were launched by drones against suspected militant strongholds in Pakistan, Friday.  The number killed is still unconfirmed but according to CNN and AP the most up to date figure sits at 10.  Google News sources place it much higher, at 18.

Missiles fired from a suspected U.S. spy plane killed 10 people Friday in Pakistan just east of the Afghan border, security officials said, the first such strike since the inauguration of President Barack Obama.

At least five of the dead were identified as foreign militants, an intelligence officer said.

The missile strike on the lawless region where al-Qaida militants are known to hide out is the latest in a barrage of more than 30 since the middle of last year.

Pakistan's pro-U.S. leaders had expressed hope Obama would halt the attacks, which have reportedly killed several top al-Qaida operatives but triggered anger at the government by nationalist and Muslim critics.

Islamabad routinely protests the strikes in the northwest as a violation of the country's sovereignty, but most observers speculate it has an unwritten agreement allowing them to take place, noting it would be highly damaging to be seen as colluding with Washington in attacks on its people.


Videos

US missle strike in Pakistan North Waziristan

see larger video

sourced by Tina Kells

US missle strike in Pakistan North Waziristan

At least one missile hit a house in a village near the town of Mirali in North Waziristan, a stronghold of al-Qaeda and Taleban militants.

It is the first such attack since Barack Obama was inaugurated as US president on Tuesday.

Pakistan has long argued that such strikes are counter-productive and are a violation of its sovereignty.

Meanwhile, two security personnel were killed when a suicide bomber rammed his vehicle into a military checkpoint in the Fizzagat area of the Swat Valley in north-western Pakistan.

Swat plays host to frequent battles between the Pakistani army and Islamic militants trying to enforce a strict form of Islamic law set down by Mullah Fazlullah, a radical cleric.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Paschen

That is what I was afraid off, no change in US foreign Policies, same has Bush only on the domestic front he is making sure he gets support. 

0
politisite

No matter who is President at this time, changes in FP will take a bit of time.  I wouldn't expect a flip overnight.  President Obama inherited a war that he is going to have to win. 

0
Blue Crush

Second attack, and death rate up to 18 now.

0
Tina Kells

Thanks! I have added this information to the body of the article.

Tina

0
158

Good story.  Obama has said he intends to add troops and win in Afghanistan so this is not surprising.

0
politisite

Tina, I think I have seen the same stance by Gibbs on the campaign trail... how odd.  Folks kept saying that Obama was going to be more open and transparent, like his executive orders say, but I know better.  The way media was managed was to put us as far away from then candidate Obama and make sure we had no access.  He was by far the most difficult of all the candidates to reach for comments after an event.  When I say all of the candidates, I mean both democrats and republicans.

This no comment and managed information will be much wider then folks would have expected.  I expect the media to get so frustrated that they turn on him and go somewhat negitive in a few short weeks.  Heck a friend who covers the WH is already telling me how upset the media is already.

0
politisite

Now on the specific issue.  A no comment stance is probably the right one.  Remember he was the one that talked specifically about going into Pakistan for high value targets.

0
Barry Artiste

Boy that doesn't look too good for Obamaramaittes

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Paschen
First Flagged at 8:16 AM, Jan 23, 2009 by Paschen
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (30)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from