NP Rank:
Pakistan Missile Strikes, No Comment Policy, Continue Under Obama
President Obama has vowed to lead the United States in an era of change but one thing that doesn't appear to have changed yet is the US military policy on Pakistan. The Obama administration's pledge of transparency appears to be at odds with the issue of Pakistan.
In a Friday press briefing the White House Press Secretary was quick to shoot down all questions about any missile strikes in Pakistan. When asked about reports from the region Robert Gibbs curtly replied, "I'm not going to comment on those matters... now about job creation."
When pressed by reporters to qualify this comment as a now or ever statement Gibbs clarified, "I'm not going to comment on those matters today." During the course of the briefing several reporters further pressed the issue and raised the point that other US representatives were confirming the strikes. Gibbs held firm to his "no comment" stand.
Whether Gibbs or the White House care to comment or not, reports from the North Waziristan region continue to suggest that a double missile strike has occurred and that injuries and fatalities have resulted.
CNN reports that 2 missiles were launched by drones against suspected militant strongholds in Pakistan, Friday. The number killed is still unconfirmed but according to CNN and AP the most up to date figure sits at 10. Google News sources place it much higher, at 18.
Missiles fired from a suspected U.S. spy plane killed 10 people Friday in Pakistan just east of the Afghan border, security officials said, the first such strike since the inauguration of President Barack Obama.At least five of the dead were identified as foreign militants, an intelligence officer said.
The missile strike on the lawless region where al-Qaida militants are known to hide out is the latest in a barrage of more than 30 since the middle of last year.
Pakistan's pro-U.S. leaders had expressed hope Obama would halt the attacks, which have reportedly killed several top al-Qaida operatives but triggered anger at the government by nationalist and Muslim critics.
Islamabad routinely protests the strikes in the northwest as a violation of the country's sovereignty, but most observers speculate it has an unwritten agreement allowing them to take place, noting it would be highly damaging to be seen as colluding with Washington in attacks on its people.
At least one missile hit a house in a village near the town of Mirali in North Waziristan, a stronghold of al-Qaeda and Taleban militants.
It is the first such attack since Barack Obama was inaugurated as US president on Tuesday.
Pakistan has long argued that such strikes are counter-productive and are a violation of its sovereignty.
Meanwhile, two security personnel were killed when a suicide bomber rammed his vehicle into a military checkpoint in the Fizzagat area of the Swat Valley in north-western Pakistan.
Swat plays host to frequent battles between the Pakistani army and Islamic militants trying to enforce a strict form of Islamic law set down by Mullah Fazlullah, a radical cleric.
Crowd Power
-
jbenson2
Saint Michael, Minnesota, United States -
Tina Kells
Vancouver, Canada -
TDH
vancouver, Canada -
Tokyo Teri
United States
Recommendations (30)
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan 
Anonymous users (2)
-
politisite
Columbia, South Carolina, United States -
Marisa Olivia
Katoomba, New South Wales, Australia -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada









Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 08:16 on January 23rd, 2009
That is what I was afraid off, no change in US foreign Policies, same has Bush only on the domestic front he is making sure he gets support.
at 09:14 on January 24th, 2009
No matter who is President at this time, changes in FP will take a bit of time. I wouldn't expect a flip overnight. President Obama inherited a war that he is going to have to win.
at 09:21 on January 23rd, 2009
Second attack, and death rate up to 18 now.
at 10:59 on January 23rd, 2009
Thanks! I have added this information to the body of the article.
Tina
at 09:39 on January 23rd, 2009
Good story. Obama has said he intends to add troops and win in Afghanistan so this is not surprising.
at 09:10 on January 24th, 2009
Tina, I think I have seen the same stance by Gibbs on the campaign trail... how odd. Folks kept saying that Obama was going to be more open and transparent, like his executive orders say, but I know better. The way media was managed was to put us as far away from then candidate Obama and make sure we had no access. He was by far the most difficult of all the candidates to reach for comments after an event. When I say all of the candidates, I mean both democrats and republicans.
This no comment and managed information will be much wider then folks would have expected. I expect the media to get so frustrated that they turn on him and go somewhat negitive in a few short weeks. Heck a friend who covers the WH is already telling me how upset the media is already.
at 09:12 on January 24th, 2009
Now on the specific issue. A no comment stance is probably the right one. Remember he was the one that talked specifically about going into Pakistan for high value targets.
at 05:46 on January 27th, 2009
Boy that doesn't look too good for Obamaramaittes