Pakistani Rulers Used Tribesmen For Earning Dollars

by voiceforpeace | August 20, 2009 at 05:50 am
60 views | 2 Recommendations | 3 comments

Now this is clear to all and sundry that rulers of Pakistan have used innocent tribesmen for earning dollars. Thousands of tribesmen have been killed just for the dollars. Rulers of Pakistan have created terrorists and then Taliban and later they got a contract from the United States for killing them. The United States administration can rightly be held responsible for deaths and destruction in the tribal areas situated on Pak-Afghan border. I think readers on the NP will be aware of the drama being staged on the name of war on terrorism. Everyone on the NP will be aware of the drama of Taliban creattion. Actually the rulers of Paksitan have asked the tribesmen to take up arms against the United States.

"The capture of Maulvi Umar, a success hot on the heels of the killing of Baitullah Mehsud, is another blow for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan. Umar is the most high-profile of TTP leaders captured to date and, as a member of the TTP central shura, he will know much about the dynamics of that network, its strengths and weaknesses and its future plans. Hopefully, information obtained from Umar will lead to the capture and elimination of more militant leaders in the days to come. In the wake of Mehsud’s death, the succession issue has still not been sorted out by the TTP and indications are that the various commanders unified under Mehsud could soon seriously start fighting one another. Indeed, it appears that Umar was travelling to Orakzai Agency for consultations or to mediate on the succession issue. So, in such an already confused situation with the foot soldiers of the TTP potentially demoralised, the capture of a senior leader of the TTP could lead to rapid successes against its various factions.

Yet, Umar’s capture will cause renewed concern about the state’s tenuous writ in vast tracts of Fata. Initial media reports put the success down to the actions of a tribal lashkar in Mohmand, but it now appears that the individuals involved in Umar’s capture may in fact be pro-government Taliban fighters. And the ease with which Umar was reportedly travelling between the Mohmand, Bajaur and Orakzai agencies is also unsettling. No doubt Fata is a vast area of treacherous terrain and tracking the movement of small groups of people is very difficult. However, all three agencies that Umar was reportedly traversing are agencies in which the security forces have launched various operations in the recent past. Whatever the successes of those operations, clearly more, much more, remains to be done before the state can claim to have an acceptable degree of control over the situation there.


Indeed, the main question has yet to be answered: does the state have a coherent, workable plan for regaining some semblance of control over Fata and eliminating the safe havens of militants there? Complicating that question is the fact that it is not clear yet if the security forces are in the process of mopping up in Malakand division or whether they are hunkering down for a guerrilla war in the months ahead. If the security forces get bogged down in Swat, it is debatable whether they will seriously consider tackling the vastly bigger mess that is Fata. So while Maulvi Umar’s capture is a boon, it raises more questions than it answers."

Source: dawn.com

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Babel-Fish

I can not see why the elite in power in Pakistan would gain out of supporting fundamentalism it would be the end to their own hold on power.

I am sorry to say that I believe this publication is propaganda, that in fact the government of pakistan has not such a close involvement with the Taliban.  Nor have they been set against the USA. Originally the Taliban were however set against the russians by the USA.  The Taliban protected El-Queda's Bin Laden and his group, prior to that they were not anti-american. Its the invasion of Afghanistan that made such changes and this had nothing to do with the leaders of Pakistan.      

0
djermano

Bob the reason Pakistan would support the Taliban is because they do not want the US to control Afghanistan. Who better to thwart opposition..when both the US and Taliban are your perceived enemies? Certainly having the US in control of Afghanistan makes things more rigid for the Pakistan Leadership, especially when it comes to India. Pakistan has more to gain by making friends with the Taliban...because they are the people who live in their region. America does not care about the region....only to control oil resources....and have an excuse to fund their crazy military....by targeting the Taliban. The Taliban use to be friends with the USA. Why the change? Pakistan is quite aware of the need to have Taliban neighbors, than to have the US breathing down their necks constantly. I think Pakistan will have dual  policy, and Russia will help the Taliban....which will get the US to finally leave. China will also support the Taliban....because they share the border with Afghanistan. China would not like to share the border with the USA.

Rev. Jermano

0
Habib Hassn

Every state need  to follow a policy for servival

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from