“… Senator Barack Obama (D-IL), spoke a month later before an AIPAC audience in Chicago. Obama, who has expressed some sympathy for the Palestinians’ plight in the past and made a brief reference to Palestinian “suffering” at a campaign appearance in March 2007, was unequivocal in his praise for Israel and made it manifestly clear that he would do nothing to change the U.S.-Israeli relationship.” (The Israel Lobby, Introduction-pg.4)
Yes. Barack Obama, the mule which Israel aggressively rides. Why do you think he showed some sympathy for Palestine at that time? Israel’s faithful pet was never meant to show any form of sympathy towards Palestinians throughout his life. Israel’s faithful pet was meant to detest Muslims and not lick their ***** (sponsored in respect for the readers and not Obama). Last year, throughout the U.S. Presidential Elections and whenever asked for an opinion, I said, “No matter who wins and becomes the president of the United States, he/she will only serve Israel and will never be
nice or have any kind of sympathy for Arabs and Muslims.”
As the Muslim anger started to mount around the world (let alone Arab anger),Uncle Sam and Israel started to seriously fear Muslims—especially after Hezbollah’s two legendary victories. When it comes to emotions, it’s easy to deal with the ignorant portions of the East. So, Uncle Sam’s new technique was to apply some lotion to this angry East, to Muslims and to their supporters and fans. I’m not saying that the lotion worked with everyone, but it did work with a remarkable number of people.
Suddenly, a nice U.S. Senator appeared on the U.S. soil and had some association with Muslims, had a father named
Hussein, promised to shut down Guantanamo, swore to pull the troops out of Iraq and sympathized with Palestinians. Suddenly, the Western supporters of the Palestinian cause could easily win fancy seats, appear on various TV channels and not be harassed by anyone who could throw them in jail.
They say today’s readers are tomorrow’s leaders. When the term “leaders” means acquiring fancy political jobs, the saying is FALSE. F-A-L-S-E. False. Do you think a
reader who supports the Palestinian cause and loves Muslims would have so much hope in Barack Obama? Nope. A Pal-Supporter who reads, must have read about the history of the Holy Land from different perspectives. A Pal-Supporter who reads, must have read about WWI, WWII, the Sykes-Picot Agreement and Balfour’s Declaration. A Pal-Supporter who reads, must have read about Zionism and its role in shaping U.S. and European foreign policies. A Pal-Supporter who reads, must have read about the rise of Israel. A Pal-Supporter who reads must have
at least read “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy”. A smart politician in general is someone who knows that Democracy is nothing but Dictatorship with a college degree.
A Pal-Supporter who thought Barack Obama was going to be the Salahuddin of the twenty-first century is definitely someone who did not read about any of the previously mentioned topics. “Or” he/she did read about them… but, sadly, either failed to comprehend or failed to form a logical link (with respect to everyone). He/she must be busy reading what the papers wrote about his/her three V’s: victories, vices and virtues. Victories may include donating a cherry from a vast fruit basket to the starving children of Palestine, and posing for some obsessed Arab camera during a demonstration for supporting Palestine. Vices may include drinking, adultery, coke habits, giving blowjobs, eating pussy, abusing women, smoking weed, lying, … etc. Virtues include one thing: supporting the Palestinian cause. And I can assure you that if any of those Pal-Supporters (whether real or fake) posed the least threat on the existence of Israel, he/she will most likely either be in jail or—in the best cases—wiping the floor of some public institution.
You know the Palestinian cause is the cause of the century. Every non-Muslim and non-Arab who genuinely supports this cause must expect having at least 5 years of fame, and who isn’t thirsty for attention and fame? One of the easiest ways to win fame is to lick Muslim and Arab ***. Namely Arab-Muslim ***. Many Arabs are ready to worship whoever showed the least support for them and any of their causes—as if they find it implausible that someone from the West loved them. Poor ole Arabs.
Now some of you might think I’m against every non-Muslim and non-Arab who supports the Palestinian cause. Of course I’m
not, shall never be and have no right to be against anyone who supports any heroic, humane cause. I salute those who had the ability to see the truth in a world full of lies. I’m against people who
use the Palestinian cause in order to gain some publicity and in order to satisfy some personal and narcissistic needs. It’s quite easy for me to spot out most of those. Do you think a woman who truly sympathizes with the children of Palestine and fights for them would have an abortion? Do you think a man who truly feels sorry for Palestinian women and fights for them would abuse women? A person’s private life
does matter.
Back to Obama. Didn’t you notice how the man
loves being on TV? The only reason why he went into American politics was because he most likely couldn’t make it in LA. The man wanted to be globally adored, so he had to pretend he had feelings for Palestine while he was busy being Israel’s good boy. Israel wanted that as well in order to fool a bunch of emotion-driven people who probably don’t know how to read and love listening to mottos. As a kid, perhaps Obama thought Palestine was some video game or some happy meal.
To all those who dramatically defended Obama as if he were their dad and compassionately supported him as if he were the promised Salahuddin: Did Barack Obama keep any of his promises regarding America’s foreign policy? Did he pull the troops out of Iraq? Did he shut down Guantanamo? Did he do anything to support the people of Palestine? The only promise he kept was the so-called ‘war on terrorism’. He obviously meant war on the innocent and war on Pakistan and Afghanistan. Obviously, Obama is a barking dog… and barking dogs never bite.
If I met Obama, I will not throw my shoes at him… simply because he’s not worth it. I won’t waste a pair of lovely shoes on the Satan who wears the mask of a Saint. George Bush was worth the shoes because he wasn’t wearing any mask. He stood in front of the world with his all-criminal face.
A final note: If you longed for fame and glory, go to Hollywood and let Palestine be!
Anan Tello
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 18:05 on August 21st, 2009
The problem is that each and every president is faced with this middle east problem, then USA is always blamed for Israels need to survive. Really its Israel that's the beast of its own demise and the Arabs share that same problem. I wrote an analysis on the Middle eastern problem a year or so ago that shows who is really to blame.
medinat-yisrael-jewish-problem it worth reading....
The Arab based opinion that USA backs Israel and is its lackey by choice is wrong. USA has been placed into its situation because of the history of the problem. Yes there is a Hugh Zionist lobby in the USA and USA is tied to a treaty. Everybody want this problem to go away until the Israelis and the Arabs start to be sensible and stop this power and religious based struggle, USA is the piggy in the middle.
Obama is pulling the troops out from Iraq and it will be handed back to the people. Also look at the truth of the promise concerning Guantanamo it had a time limit of a year, that time has not expired yet and its to soon to say he has broke the promise.
However I am not happy with Obama but for things he can really be blamed for and not those that he can not as that just would not be fair.
at 10:45 on August 22nd, 2009
What passion living in one of the most culpable countries interested in continuing terror in the Middle East. Since when has Syria ever been interested in the Palestinians. Please share the truth about the massacres that have taken place in Syria where thousands have been killed. If you would like I would be more then happy to let everyone know of the "compassionate" side of Syria. Especially during the Yom Kippur war on the Golan Heights where Syrian soldiers were handcuffed to their machine guns as their officers fled.
Maybe you have an ally in Babel-Fish with his own interests in the "Zionist conspiracy" which is usually the code word for we know what. Babel-Fish there is no "Zionist lobby" in the US. There are JEWS that know the importance of a Jewish State and support it in every legal way possible in the US. Nothing wrong with that effort. You make it sound so evil. Nothing evil about JEWS having their own State. There was an article just recently in the WSJ that discusses the European wholesale slaughter of the indigence populations for land. Hmm. Sounds pretty awful. But what the hell, that was a long time ago.
You also know the history of the Philippines and that bloody situation that is still in flux.
It gets tiring when you focus on Israel when the real problem has been the desire of the ARAB world, including Syria to keep the Palestinians in a state of limbo in order to focus attention away from their dictatorships and brutality toward their own people.
The Israeli-Palestinian situation will never be resolved as long as the Palestinian leadership is more interested in receiving blood/guilt money from the European Union instead of forging ahead with a sincere desire for a State. Why the need of a State when they can put money, money ,money in their Swiss bank accounts with no responsibility for the welfare of their population. Hamas was correct regarding that point. In fact today Hamas claims that it has been Abbas that has derailed the prisoner exchange with Israel for fear of the release of Hamas loyalists by Israel. If true then this is one more nail in the coffin.