Palin backs sending U.S. natural gas overseas

by dunkelberg | October 21, 2008 at 11:10 am
90 views | 5 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Estimates Show Sarah Palin's Assets Top $1M

Estimates Show Sarah Palin's Assets Top $1M

see larger image

uploaded by integrityforamerica

Sarah Palin tells campaign audiences the United States needs to become energy independent, produce what we use and use what we produce.


But the Alaska governor and GOP vice presidential candidate has pushed the federal government to allow a liquefied natural gas plant to continue exporting to Asia - the only such plant in the United States that sends the product overseas.

She pressed it her debate with Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Joe Biden.

"When we talk about energy, we have to consider the need to do all that we can to allow this nation to become energy-independent," Palin said earlier this month during the vice presidential debate. "It's a nonsensical position that we are in when we have domestic supplies of energy all over this great land. And East Coast politicians who don't allow energy-producing states like Alaska to produce these, to tap into them, and instead we're relying on foreign countries to produce for us."

However, the Kenai Liquefied Natural Gas facility in Alaska ships its liquified natural gas (LNG) to Japan through a special export license.  Gov. Palin praised the Energy Department this summer when it extended the license to ship LNG to Asia through 2011, in essence renewing a permit that  would have expired next year.

"In these times of economic uncertainty, this is great news for the state and its residents," Palin said when the license was approved in June.

During negotiations, which began last year, Palin had pressed for enough natural gas to serve Alaska to remain in-state. She added, however, that the rest should be shipped primarily to Japan.

The license was granted despite opposition from some federal officials who argued that domestic liquefied natural gas should be sold within the U.S.

"If America is really so short of energy that we need to drill in national wildlife refuges and other sensitive areas, why should energy supplies, sitting in U.S. terminals, be sent back out of the country simply because these energy companies can get a higher price from a foreign buyer?" Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said.

The plant's owners, Marathon Oil Corp. and ConocoPhillips, had argued that U.S. terminals equipped to handle shipments of liquefied natural gas were too far away, on the East Coast, in the South or in Puerto Rico.

San Diego-based Sempra Energy opened a new $975 million terminal in Baja, Mexico, in May. Its pipelines connect to California, Texas and Arizona.

Volatile oil and gas prices and limited energy supplies have prompted a steady increase in U.S. use of liquefied natural gas.

But aside from Alaska, there is no domestic production.

So while the United States imported 771 billion cubic feet of natural gas last year from Trinidad and Tobago, Algeria, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria and Qatar, Alaska is expected to export 100 billion cubic feet to Asia over the next two years.


recommend This comment thread is now closed
Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:23 on October 21st, 2008

dunkelberg, I like this story. It's good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from