NP Rank:
PALIN CANDIDACY RAISES EYEBROWS FOR ALASKA NATIVES
(This is my opinion - supported by an article from the New York POST. Since I have been grumbled at previously about the fact that we shouldn't copy-paste entire articles with the highlight tool, I put my preface on the article. That does not, however, make this entire article an opinion.) The more time that the news media has to dig into Palin, the more concerned we should all be that McCain has picked her.
We know that Cheney and Haliburton are side by side, we know that George Bush supports big oil because of what he's done over the last 4 years.
However, was John McCain's choice of Palin a rooted in her "merits" or more of the same?
You tell me - but if we only have 7 years to change our habits significantly to avoid massive climate shift within our lifetimes (for those of us in our 30's) maybe this isn't the way to go.
Yes, maybe she has a history of "fighting" corruption - but when pitted against the investigation that's currently going on it makes you wonder about ethics.
On a side note - doesn't Alaska have a history of a shortage of Women - and hasn't it resorted to paying them to live there at different points in history? Aren't people of AK still being paid to live there as part of the Alaskian Permanent Dividend Fund which is funded in part by BIG OIL? Humm. ( End My opinion, what follows is the NY Post piece.)
ANCHORAGE, Alaska - Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is a comely candidate with a reputation for fighting corruption, but lately her reputation within the state has been bit by allegations of mixing political and family business, and by mistreating one of the state's premier marine mammals.
Palin's catch-phrase of "openness and transparency" has been tarnished by revelations that staff members tried to have Palin's former brother-in-law fired from his job as an Alaska state trooper.
Also, the governor of the only state with polar bears has adamantly opposed listing the animals as a threatened species, despite strong evidence that global warming has devastated their sea ice environment off Alaska's coast.
And despite John McCain's claim Friday that Palin is a budget-cutter, the governor this year oversaw 6 percent increase in Alaska's operating and construction budget, fueled by a revised tax structure and skyrocketing crude oil prices.
Dermot Cole, a longtime columnist for Alaska's second largest newspaper, the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, called McCain's choice of Palin "reckless" and questioned her credentials.
"Sarah Palin's chief qualification for being elected governor was that she was not Frank Murkowski," Cole said of her enormously unpopular predecessor, who lost favor with Alaskans in part because of unpopular budget cuts. "She was not elected because she was a conservative. She was not elected because of her grasp of issues or because of her track record as the mayor of Wasilla."
Her enormous popularity in the state took a hit this summer over her firing of her public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan, a former Anchorage police chief.
State lawmakers launched a $100,000 investigation to determine if Palin dismissed Monegan because he would not fire the governor's ex-brother-in-law, Alaska State Trooper Mike Wooten, who has been involved in a messy custody battle with Palin's sister.
In 2005, before Palin ran for office, the Palin family accused Wooten of drinking beer in his patrol car, illegally shooting a moose and firing a Taser at his 11-year-old stepson. The Palins also claimed Wooten threatened to kill Sarah Palin's father. Wooten was suspended over the allegations for five days in 2006 but still has his job.
Palin denied the commissioner's dismissal had anything to do with her former brother-in-law and denied orchestrating dozens of telephone calls made by staff and family members to Wooten's bosses. The investigation launched by state lawmakers is expected to take at least three months.
State Sen. Hollis French, D-Anchorage, said Palin's candidacy does not change the investigation.
I think it raises its profile. I don't think it changes the steps you go through. It is what it is. You have to find out what happened," French said.
The investigator hired by lawmakers two days ago told the Department of Law it was time to schedule Palin's deposition, French said.
Palin, in a move that shook up Alaska's Republican party, took on the state's long-term congressional delegation, U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young, calling on them to explain why they're the target of federal corruption investigations.
But she has been just as dogged trying to protect Alaska's main industry and cash cow, petroleum extraction, from the side-effects of Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne's decision to list polar bears as a threatened species.
"Listing polar bears under the Endangered Species Act has the potential to damage Alaska's and the nation's economy without any benefit to polar bear numbers or their habitat," Palin said, a statement environmental groups call ridiculous.
Polar bears use sea ice as a platform to hunt seals and the listing has the potential to disrupt future offshore drilling in polar bear territory. The disappearance of ice at such an alarming rate forced Kempthorne, who had not added a U.S. creature to the endangered species list since he took office, to declare polar bears threatened.
Summer sea ice last year shrunk to the lowest level since the beginning of satellite observations, about 1.65 million square miles, nearly 40 percent less than the long-term average between 1979 and 2000. The National Snow and Ice Data Center said this week that 2008 could break that record. Most climate modelers predict a continued downward spiral, possibly with an Arctic Ocean that's ice free during summer months by 2030 or sooner.
Palin contends climate models are unreliable, polar bear numbers have not crashed and they've survived other periods of warming. She has also claimed polar bears could adapt to living on land - a contention most international polar bear scientists find specious, given that grizzly bears already occupy that niche on land and polar bears have shown little ability to feed on land, other garbage or the occasional whale carcass.
Palin is suing to overturn Kempthorne's decision.
Palin also claims to be a fiscal conservative, but watched this year as Alaska reaped the bounty of high oil prices and a revised tax structure. The excess has spared her from any sort of challenge to make tough budget-cutting decision, but did spur her to come to the rescue of Alaskans facing the nation's highest energy costs.
Palin championed a $1 billion energy assistance package that will send each resident $1,200 to help offset energy costs, which runs to more than $9 per gallon for gasoline in rural Alaska.
That will be on top of dividends from the Alaska Permanent Fund, checks to each qualified resident that are expected to exceed $2,000 this year.
Crowd Power
-
Milieunet
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands










Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (29)
at 23:59 on August 29th, 2008
Phoenixesrose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 00:46 on August 30th, 2008
Thanks Karen.
at 09:29 on August 30th, 2008
You're welcome, Phoenixesrose.
at 01:02 on August 30th, 2008
phoenixesrose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Well for all those that like Bush and His Vice President she will be great, for the rest, we may have to worry and brace for many more Iraq Wars to come and not progress on the environmental agenda either.
at 05:06 on August 30th, 2008
How about an opinion tag? Also, I'd suggest you use the word "Alaskans" in your headline vs. "Alaska natives." The latter suggests that the indigenous peoples there have something against Palin, and your presentation doesn't support that.
I wouldn't rush to tar her with Bush's brush. I know that's the kneejerk reaction from some, but I think looking into her actual record will disprove that theory.
at 06:12 on August 30th, 2008
In Politics every thing is opinion! I only see you and BigT asking for Opinion on every thing you do not like.
at 06:26 on August 30th, 2008
Actually, I ask for an Opinion tag on everything I see that is Opinon vs. just factual news reporting. And no, I don't get around to see every single thing that is on NP. Yes, I do miss a great many. I spend very little time here, so I'm sure that I miss many many stories.
And my comments are only advice and a request. It's up to the paid staff to review the site and officially ask people to follow the same standards as given to all. That's their job. All I can do is to ask people to play fair, and choose where I give a GS flag. I won't give a GS flag to something that's a) copied and pasted b)highlighted but instead of an excerpt actually is a blatant copying of an entire article or c) is primarily Opinion but lacks the Opinion flag and tag. I'm certain I don't score 100% on all of those, either.
But, as you know, I do GS flag material I disagree with, and I state the disagreement while giving the flag. :)
at 06:43 on August 30th, 2008
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/big-dog-mccain-picks-husky-run-republican-ticket-maxine
at 06:58 on August 30th, 2008
PEP, by all du respect, I am not talking about Post or Articles you do not see, I am talking about those that you comment on and or Flag. Some of them are OPINION and yet no request for opinion on those you are partisan to and that is normal even human. Politic is a volatile game whiff High emotions and partisan affiliation. I have not yet seen one single Article relating to politics that did not reflect an opinion in some way. We could mark every thing opinion and that be fair. However no double standards. I do flag a lot of post that I do not agree with either, either because they are good or top news or need more exposure. :)
at 08:28 on August 30th, 2008
>How about an opinion tag?
No kidding. Probably eveyrthing about the national candidates should have an opinion tag.
- reply
BAH (not verified)at 05:57 on August 30th, 2008
- reply
BAH (not verified)at 06:01 on August 30th, 2008
George Bush is likely the best president ever! Imagine what would happen with Gore the dumb! I will be voting against Marxism! I see we are told what we know! I don't know any of this!
- reply
BAH (not verified)at 06:08 on August 30th, 2008
Hate Palin because she is decent and honorable. She stands for everything the Marxist hate! She probably even understands that "global warming" is bs to allow more government control. I love big oil. I am going to buy some gas and chances are it will be at the station. As a poor retired person I am proud that I will have the money even in "this economy"!!!! I will have enough left over to eat steak tonight!
at 06:21 on August 30th, 2008
I seem to recall that Sarah Palin has a recent public approval rating in the 80 to 90 percent range among voters in her state. Seems the NY Post conveniently left that out.
at 06:47 on August 30th, 2008
phoenixesrose, while the intro is opinionated (such seems not to be a problem for pro GOP pieces), the NY Post actually seems to stick to facts in this reaction story.
at 06:59 on August 30th, 2008
phoenixesrose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Palin's main contribution to McCain's White House bid is that first and foremost she's got a squeaky clean image - let's see how long that remains true now that every private investigator in the western hemisphere will be digging up dirt on her ...
And, secondly she brings a strong element of youth to McCain's admittedly 'over the hill' image ...
Both points, assuming the first remains true, are nowhere near enough to offset her total lack of any significant political experience whatever - she's been governor of Alaska for two years, and before that swam exclusively in the waters of small-time Alaska municipal fishbowls ...
at 08:13 on August 30th, 2008
Boy George Bush in a skirt/pants suit/kulots/bikini/evening gown/dress/business suit, but without the string of failed businesses and drinking problem. However, to make up for those last two, she does already have her own ongoing ethics investigation.
More of the same.
at 08:18 on August 30th, 2008
Which reminds me of her People's magazine interview:
PEOPLE: Do you feel ready to be a heartbeat away from the presidency?
SARAH: Absolutely. Yup, yup.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/30/sarah-palin-empeopleem-in_n_122605.html
*sigh
at 08:19 on August 30th, 2008
at 08:51 on August 30th, 2008
Opinion tag should be added. Phoenixrose, you seem to be from somewhere in europe, yet you state in your first sentence '...the more concerned we should all be that McCain has picked her....', as if you were actually involved in the US election process.
This is your opinion, not just an addition to the news item.
at 09:27 on August 30th, 2008
If I follow you reasoning René, then no American could nor should report about elections or events out side of the US of A and every thing any American as your self do as well reports about issues or events out side of the US should there for be labelled OPINION or not even be written. After all if it right for the one it should be right as well for the other one. So next time you write a post about Arabs, Muslims or The soon upcoming Canadian Election please do mark it as OPINION.
at 02:24 on August 31st, 2008
I'm an american living in Germany. I have full voting rights, with absentee ballot.
Because I was born in the USA, and my job transferred me to Germany, you're saying I should have no right to vote or post news articles on what's going on in my own country.
Brilliant. Ha ha ha ha ha Thank goodness that not everyone thinks that way.
at 11:03 on August 30th, 2008
Hi Rene - the USA and who runs it, is a world issue - American foreign policy and in fact internal policy and business affairs (such as the recent mortage / banking problems that have sent ripples out to us for instance in the UK and helped caused our credit crunch problems) directly affects the whole world. So 'we' I think is fine to use for people outside or inside the USA. If a piece is opinion it should marked so wherever it originates from. I'd say that this piece would probably be best labled opinion - I agree - but not because phoenixesrose is reporting from a certain location but just because it is.
- reply
Zachary Williams (not verified)at 12:44 on August 30th, 2008
This woman is interesting. (To say the least). The current investigation, which has her held responsible for firing a state employee, is not the first time this has happened. According to Wikipedia, Palin was responsible for the firing of another officer back in 1999, but was cleared of wrong doing, citing that she was allowed to fire city employees, even if it was for political reasons.
And the best information to consider yet: What if she is to become president? I mean come on! We have a woman who was mayor of a tiny Alaskan town, to the governor of a state rich in petroleum, albeit a tiny (population wise) state, given the chance to take the reigns of the USA if, god forbid, McCain should pass during his time as President? Scary. Not that I beliee McCain can be elected anyway.
Wasilla, AK has some famous residents now! check this out:
I think this ticket choice is bogus, political, irresponsible, and has very little serious merit for the intelligence of the American People.
at 13:13 on August 30th, 2008
Good piece here.
I think the intro to your piece would merit an opinion flag however. You can just go into the 'edit' mode and check the box 'opinion'. It would just give more clarity to the piece in my opinion.
Here's a forum post about the opinion flag if you are interested. Thanks!
at 00:47 on August 31st, 2008
phoenixesrose, I like this story. It's good stuff.
- reply
Clarissa Westenburger (not verified)at 09:45 on September 7th, 2008
Cheney has secretely died and come back as Palin: ya betcha, hockey mom!
Keeping up with Republican traditions, Sarah Palin is poised to remake herself into the new Dick Cheney. Stealing from the American treasures of Alaska is not above Sarah Palin, nor the largesse of casting the crumbs to the Alaskan natives for 30 pieces of silver, I think it amounted to $3000 for their "oil rights" for those starving on the tundra living on caribou, the Inouye Indians. National Geographic did a story called "Fall of the Wild" about Alaska's North Slope. This should give you an idea of how American money has floated the crooks running Alaska. Nor is Palin above paying for Alaskan votes with the oil company money she gouged from them, as one crook to another.
Too bad the fundamentalists don't see paying for votes and lying as somehow "sin".
As for taking on corruption, in fact, she studied it from Stevens who is now being charged and she may well have taken his place, but now she's after bigger fish. Well, hon, you don't ask, you don't get--get it?
- reply
Clarissa Westenburger (not verified)at 09:52 on September 7th, 2008
The real problem for Palin is the Constitution, as Cheney also had to "rework" the laws of the Constitution to avoid the rights of prisoners so they could be tortured. Palin denigrates the torture as "reading them their rights". Maybe that's how justice is served in Alaska, on American "earmarks" to pay for police brutality. Cheney in disguise as Palin will serve up brutality to American newsmen and call it "security" at the RNC. We paid $50 million bucks to "secure" the Twin Cities, each paid $50 million. How devastating that the money was not spent on Louisiana shelters for the hurricane victims. Ya-betcha-hockey-mom will find a way to tap that Dept of Homeland Security funds run by her fundamentalist supporters who did the same for Swartzenneger in California with secret Blackwater training camps. The real question is, is Palin a better shot than Cheney?
- reply
Frita (not verified)at 09:03 on October 2nd, 2008
Guys, Sarah Palin is basically just Bush in a Skirt. Sad, but true.