Pardon Our Nanothermite-filled WTC Dust
Retired professor and forensic psychologist Michael Green has written a blistering rebuttal to OpEdNews.com managing editor Dr. John Moffet's 'smear piece' critique of the recently-published 'Active Thermitic Material' paper. In addition to exposing Moffet's disingenuous arguments, Green provides helpful analysis of the paper's findings, additional reasons to investigate 9/11, and insight on how cover ups of the power elite's crimes and real agenda work.
John R. Moffett, the distinguished neuroscientist and managing editor of OPEDNEWS, has brought his considerable prestige to bear on the issue of whether the Twin Towers and WTC7 were destroyed by controlled demolition using the incendiary and sometimes explosive thermite as a key component. Unfortunately, he has done so with either malicious incompetence, or worse, a cynical deliberate determination to distort, conceal, and suppress the findings of a recently published scientific article, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," that dispositively proves the presence of unignited explosives in the WTC dust. Neither motivation on Dr. Moffett's part obviously recommends him for his post at OPEDNEWS. I will first address Dr. Moffett's smear piece, which was promoted to OPEDNEWS headline status on 4/15/2009, then, the importance of the thermitic dust. If you think that 911 isn't your issue, you should pay close attention.