Buddha and Buddhism are well known for the Nirvana and the middle
path to enlightenment rather than extremes of any form with emphasis on
meditation. But the Buddhist monks of Sri Lanka are famous for their
political power games and extreme nationalism. Sri Lanka is the only country to have a
political party exclusively of monks not to mention their nine elected members
of the parliament. The extremist monk political party has advocated and
supported through its democratic strength in the parliament for a military
solution to the country’s ethnic strive. In a recent interview with Washington
Post, the lead monk of the political party sounding more like a military
general pledges to do the duty in the battle field.
The
USAID study of Sri Lanka’s standing on Democracy and Governance back
in 2001 concluded that the gradual unravelling of the Sri Lankan nation-state is
due to the combined effects of protracted ethnic-based conflict and
deteriorating democratic rights and institutions. The findings are very much valid
even after the six years of peace efforts. The study highlighted the serious
and irreparable damage done to the very foundation of Sri Lanka, the notion of it being a single
nation-state.
The researchers
also asserted that the protracted conflict and the obvious decline in
democratic politics and governance are directly and powerfully linked i.e. the
conflict fuels democratic decline and vice versa. Thus, any efforts to address
the decline in Sri Lanka’s democratic institutions will have
limited impact unless complemented by efforts to find a peaceful solution to
the conflict.
Further,
five key and interrelated causes were identified for the democracy and good
governance challenges faced by Sri Lanka. Any efforts to address the Sri Lanka’s worsening challenges must directly or indirectly
address all or most of these causes.
1) The
notion of the Sri Lankan nation subscribed to by many Sinhalese – including
most of Sri Lanka’s politically influential Buddhist monks
– is based on a firmly-rooted belief in the primacy of the Sinhalese/Buddhist
majority and its culture.
2)
Elite political competition, principally between two major political parties,
fuels ethnically-based majoritarian and is increasingly undemocratic.
3) The
government is excessively centralized and the large size of the state sector
gives the government excessive influence over society and intensifies political
competition for control of the state.
4) The
impact of civil society organizations (CSOs) on politics and governance has
been limited by ethnic and other divisions within civil society, by the
relative power of the state and political parties, and by the highly partisan
nature of the media.
5) The ethnic conflict has become
a well-entrenched institution that exerts a pernicious influence on society,
the economy, politics, and policy-making and governance.
The donor assistance is
identified as way to influence the strengthening of democratic institutions and
governance in Sri Lanka. Conditional aide in support of efforts
to end the conflict and achieve a sustainable peace; discouraging undemocratic
forms of political competition; encouraging the rule of law and respect for rights;
supporting efforts to improve national and local level governance; and
supporting greater and more effective citizen participation in politics and
government were the recommendations.
Will the leading donor countries such as Japan, USA and European Union achieve the nirvana in promoting democracy
and good governance in Sri
Lanka?


