Pastors to Endorse Candidates from the Pulpit on Sunday

by Albert Milliron | September 27, 2008 at 08:37 am
1309 views | 37 Recommendations | 35 comments

Photos

Pastors to Endorse Candidates from the Pulpit on Sunday

Pastors to Endorse Candidates from the Pulpit on Sunday

see larger image

uploaded by Albert Milliron

 By Albert N. Milliron

On Sunday, September 28th a test of the First Amendment will ring from Churches all over the United States.  Pastors will compare the Biblical record with the two candidates running for president.  Some will endorse a candidate based on what the Bible says.  The First Amendment has two parts

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

That congress can make no law respecting the Establishment of Religion or the free exercise of Such.  The next part is regarding the Freedom of Speech.  It has been established that churches cannot inject itself into the political process or they will lose tax exemption status.  Many feel that this is a pure violation of the first Amendment that allows for the free exercise of such and freedom of speech.  Congress is to make no law regarding this amendment. 

Churches enjoy tax exemption due to the Establishment Clause in the constitution.  Many feel that if a pastor or church endorse a candidate they cross the line by mixing church and state.  The Amendment does not allow for the State to interject itself into the Church.  There is no provision prohibiting the Church from interjecting itself into the political process. 

The Term Separation of Church and State is not found anywhere in the US Constitution.  It is taught in schools and universities.  The Amendment was established to make sure that the United States does not adopt a State religion as was the case in England.  Folks came to America from England and Germany to get away from a Church who ruled state affairs.

On Sunday, Pastors in 22 states will put the first Amendment to test.  Many in the Government state that they are jeopardizing their tax exempt status

Why don't churches pay taxes?

In its 1970 opinion in Walz vs. Tax Commission of the City of New York, the high court stated that a tax exemption for churches "creates only a minimal and remote involvement between church and state and far less than taxation of churches. [An exemption] restricts the fiscal relationship between church and state, and tends to complement and reinforce the desired separation insulating each from the other." The Supreme Court also said that "the power to tax involves the power to destroy." Taxing churches breaks down the healthy separation of church and state and leads to the destruction of the free exercise of religion.

The church has an allegiance to ones God. This was a matter that was an issue in the First Century Church. During the First Christianity became illegal and the Caesar required the inhabitants to recognize him as god. Many Christian died because it would not bow to Caesar as their god as their allegiance was to the God of the Bible.

If the Bible has provisions that are forbidden one might think it the responsibility of the Church to exercise its freedom of speech and Religion to share with ones congregation that candidate X does not support the Biblical record.

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. — Pastors participating in the Alliance Defense Fund’s “Pulpit Freedom Sunday” will preach from their pulpits Sept. 28 about the moral qualifications of candidates seeking political office.  The pastors will exercise their First Amendment right to preach on the subject, despite federal tax regulations that prohibit intervening or participating in a political campaign.

“Pastors have a right to speak about Biblical truths from the pulpit without fear of punishment.  No one should be able to use the government to intimidate pastors into giving up their constitutional rights,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley.  “If you have a concern about pastors speaking about electoral candidates from the pulpit, ask yourself this:  should the church decide that question, or should the IRS?”

Pulpit Freedom Sunday is an event associated with the ADF Pulpit Initiative (www.telladf.org/church), a legal effort designed to secure the First Amendment rights of pastors in the pulpit.  A document explaining what the Pulpit Initiative is and is not is available at www.telladf.org/UserDocs/WhatIsPI.pdf.

“ADF is not trying to get politics into the pulpit.  Churches can decide for themselves that they either do or don’t want their pastors to speak about electoral candidates.  The point of the Pulpit Initiative is very simple:  the IRS should not be the one making the decision by threatening to revoke a church’s tax-exempt status.  We need to get the government out of the pulpit,” said Stanley.

Stanley explained that, contrary to the misunderstandings of many, tax-exempt status is not a “gift” or “subsidy” bestowed by the government.

“Churches were completely free to preach about candidates from the day that the Constitution was ratified in 1788 until 1954.  That’s when the unconstitutional rule known as the ‘Johnson Amendment’ was enacted,” explained Stanley.  “Churches are exempt from taxation under the principle that there is no surer way to destroy religion than to begin taxing it.  As the U.S. Supreme Court has noted, the power to tax involves the power to destroy.  The real effect of the Johnson Amendment is that pastors are muzzled for fear of investigation by the IRS.”

After Sept. 28, ADF plans to provide via news release a list of pastors who participated in Pulpit Freedom Sunday.

In 1954 then Senator Johnson offered an amendment that was passed.  The Amendment was inserted into the  IRS code with out any debate or discussion.  The Johnson Amendment shaped the IRS code for more then 50 years. 

 In 1954, Congress saw the need to separate charities and churches from politics. An amendment was offered on the floor of the Senate by then-Senator Lyndon Johnson. 
 
The Johnson amendment is found within the well-known section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. In its present form, the law states that charities, including churches, are not allowed to “participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements) any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.” 

Freedom of speech and religious liberty are essential elements of our democracy. But the Supreme Court has in essence held that tax exemption is a privilege, not a right, stating, “Congress has not violated [an organization’s] First Amendment rights by declining to subsidize its First Amendment activities.”

The rule against intervention by charities and churches in political campaigns has been entrenched in the law for over a half-century. Congress enacted the law. The Courts upheld it. Our job at the IRS is to educate the public and charities about the law and to enforce it in a fair and evenhanded manner.

In 2004 the IRS began enforcing the Politiking by Churches and found some 84 groups that violated the, "Code".

Sunday's action will cause Johnson's Amendment that found itself in the IRS code challenged.  The expectation is that the court will be interjected into the question.  The Internal Revenue Service will be challenged if it has a right under the consitution to prohibit free speech in religion both of which were not to be infringed or a law made to limited either.

Just one thought, what would be the reason the framers would put the Freedoms of Speech, Press, and Religion within the same amendment?  Could it be that the people, press, and religion be the forth componet of a free state.  To call into question its activities? 

Related Items:

  • Pulpit Initative
  • IR-2006-36, IRS Releases New Guidance and Results of Political Intervention Examinations
  • FS-2006-17, Election Year Activities and the Prohibition on Political Campaign Intervention for Section 501(c)(3) Organizations 

Related NowPublic Stories:

Christian radicals declare holy way on IRS by Dunklburg

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
dunkelberg

Looks like an opinion to me - just the same as my post [Christian radicals declare holy way on IRS] was and is.

0
Albert Milliron

I disagree.  It is a constitutional argument based on facts.  I will add your article in the body for a balanced article.  Your article is an opinion because your first line says, Extremist Christian Radicals"  That is an opinion. I did a search and did not see your article come up.

0
dunkelberg

No problem with your post.  I don't think an opinion piece (and I speak of my post here) should ever trump or lay claim to first posting.  No worries here.

Cheers!


0
Albert Milliron

Well, I just thought it would be appropriate to add your story as it gives another persepective.  You know I always like to round out stories with other view points if one is available.  I just didn't find it when I did a quiak search on the keywords.  I was surprised as you did your two days ago.  I just thought the piece was more of an editorial of the subject.  If others folks agree with you that  it is opinion, I will be happy to add the tag.  Hope all is well

0
dunkelberg

Frankly, I have reread and discovered I misread in my haste and got a wrong read with  my reading.  I withdraw my challenge, or whatever it was, with apologies. 


0
Albert Milliron

Hey, I have done the same... I guess you are really Human after all LOL

Jordan Yerman
Jordan Yerman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:35 on September 27th, 2008

politisite, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Albert Milliron

Thanks Jordan, Dunkenburg said I should add an opinion tag to this story, to be fair to him, do you agree?

0
dunkelberg

dunkelberg - d-u-n-k-e-l-b-e-r-g - has withdrawn his remark

0
Albert Milliron

I am sorry for the mispell.  It is one of my defects.  I corrected the spelling in the body of the story as well.  I appologise for the mistake

René
René
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:13 on September 27th, 2008

Sunday will tell the tale. How many in the media will cover it?

0
Albert Milliron

What a way to get Media folk to go to church LOL

0
dunkelberg


0
dunkelberg

The media indeed already is covering it.

As for Sunday, it will depend largely on the policy of the church to allow news media into a service.  However, it has been my professional experience that even the most secretive, self-absorbed and duplicitous radical Christian fundamentalist will open the sanctuary doors to the news media when it benefits a cause or issue that promises to bring in more money to the coffers.  I imagine the news media will be allowed inside.

0
Albert Milliron

Most have no problem with media coming.  The only issue they usually have is using flash photography during the service.  It is the policy in our church that photos may be taken but no flash photography as it is a worship service. 

I am sure my church will not be doing something like this as we have a diverse congregation with members supporting both candidates.  Our attitude is that the Church is to learn about Christ and how to live in this world.  We beleive that ones choice in a candidate is up to the individual and one can make that choice on their own.

Amy Judd
Amy Judd
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:45 on September 27th, 2008

politisite, I like this story. It's good stuff.

I'm not sure it needs an opinion flag, in my opinion

0
dunkelberg

The government censoring the pulpit?

That is a bald-faced lie.

Nothing in the law has ever stopped any radical fundamentalist from endorsing a political candidate from the pulpit.  The prohibition only comes when you want tax free status for all the money your church, temple or congregation brings into the coffers.  


These Christian extremists just want to have their communion wafer and eat it too.

There's nothing in the First Amendment that prohibits the taxing of churches.

Barry ORegan
Barry ORegan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:33 on September 27th, 2008

politisite, I like this story. It's good stuff. ah yes, nothing like separation of church and state eh Al!

0
Karen Hatter

Dr. James Dobson, of Focus on the Family, a supporter of Senator McCain, is listed as one of the founders of Alliance Defense Fund, with all other founders listed as deceased.

Focus on the Family, identified as a collection of evangelical organizations, becoming highly visible in the 1980s and working to promote socially conservative policies, is the organization that posted a video at its website asking visitors, as a joke, to pray for rain during the evening of Senator Obama's speech, accepting his nomination as the Democratic Party's nominee for president of the United States during the Democratic National Convention, held in Denver, Colorado this past August 2008.

The speech was delivered in a domeless stadium.

Dr. Dobson has been a consistent critic of Senator Obama.

0
Albert Milliron

Dobson has been a critic of McCain as well.  He did not vote for him in the primary and stated that he reluctently will vote for McCain in the General election. Earlier he told his supporters that he would not vote in the election. 

Evangelical Christian leader James Dobson has not endorsed a candidate for the Republican nomination, but his statement today declaring he would sit out the general election if Sen. John McCain becomes the GOP winner was quickly highlighted by Gov. Mitt Romney's campaign.
He has since changed his mind. Concidering the oposition

 

0
Karen Hatter

The Worldnetdaily.com article highlighted is from February 2008.

I know there was an infinitesimally remote chance, if even that, that Dr. Dobson would support Senator Obama, no matter who became the Republican nominee.

Whomever came out ahead in the Republican contest would be Dr. Dobson's choice.  

From Time.com, July 2008:

In an advance copy provided to The Associated Press, Dobson said that while neither candidate is consistent with his views, McCain's positions are closer by a wide margin.

"There's nothing dishonorable in a person rethinking his or her positions, especially in a constantly changing political context," Dobson said in a statement to the AP. "Barack Obama contradicts and threatens everything I believe about the institution of the family and what is best for the nation. His radical positions on life, marriage and national security force me to reevaluate the candidacy of our only other choice, John McCain."

Whether those who tend to follow the direction of Dr. Dobson and Focus on the Family will be listening to any sermons from any of these pulpits, couched with a favorable slant, when and if Senator Obama is one of the candidates alleged to be discussed and viewed through a biblical prism, is highly doubtful.

Pat Garcia
Pat Garcia
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:37 on September 27th, 2008

politisite, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Albert Milliron

Thank You

0
Modoc

I think this is awesome. The Christian community has been too passive for too long. Churches have been threatend and members made to feel like the "freaks" of society. The facts are from the early "readers" provided to our public school students, to the ten commandments on government buildings all across our nation, religon has been part of our heritage. Do the research! The laws were written to provide protection from the government, instead the government has alienate the church. Look where this has taken us. Our nation is out of control on nearly ever level, still we try to remove morality from our society.  

0
Albert Milliron

Modoc:  Christians are freaks of society.  The Bible is clear that Christians are not of this world.  By now I would think that Vinny would have wrote an article about Christians as we are called Aliens in the Bible. 

Uwe Paschen
Uwe Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 22:39 on September 27th, 2008

politisite, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Is that not unethical and unconstitutional to mix religion and Politics?

In Germany if a pastor would do that or a priest they can be prosecuted. Laic Constitution like in France and the USA as well where State and religion cannot mix and yet in the US it happens all the time, wish in it self is an breach of the constitution.

0
Albert Milliron

I encourage you to get all of the US founding documents and find the term, "Separation of church and state" in any of them.  The Constitution relates quite the opposite.  The three freedoms in the 1st amendment were added by the Founding Fathers are the 4th check on Government,  The Individual can speak out against the government, the Press checks government action, and the Church checks the Governments ethics and morality.  The Founding Fathers would have separated this amendment into two parts of those of faith did not have a role in speaking out against government abuse.  I know this was not part of Government 101 as they pass that portion after speaking on freedom of speech and Press.  The tax exempt status is still an issue I am pondering.  One could say that the taxes are paid by those who attend the church.  Some still agree that a federal income tax was never part of the founding fathers idea of a small government.

0
MODOC

You know any group in America can say anything they want, anywhere they want, except Christians. People want to be accepted (validated) and Christianity reminds them there are consquences, so they try to stamp it out. It doesn't change the fact that there is a God and we will all answer to him one day.

0
Kenny Boy Lay (hanging out with Elvis)

It's simple, remove all special tax exempt status from all religious organizations. If God wants His organization to be funded, He is surely powerful enough where He can easily do so with out me and an unnecessary decrease in federal and local revenues, possibly through supernatural manipulation. Why does God need a Congress? More importantly, aren't donations supposed to be a form of sacrifice? Why am I being forced to participate in this sacrifice and why are Churches asking to have this sacrifice weakened? Is this not like back in the day when the Ancient Hebrews practiced animal sacrifice for them to be asking for a leg back? "I want to give to my God to show my love and devotion, but I also want a little of that back from everyone else's pocket." Isn't that what tax exempt status is? It just shows the weakness of the whole God thing in my opinion. Christians should be out there demanding tax exempt status be lifted from them like a burden pointing out the weakness of God and His followers.

Finally, politicians come under the heading of Earthly Princes, and I don't think that it is wise to take sides when it comes to endorsing one of these, in fact the Bible clearly says not to.

0
Albert Milliron

"Finally, politicians come under the heading of Earthly Princes, and I don't think that it is wise to take sides when it comes to endorsing one of these, in fact the Bible clearly says not to."

Could you please share with the readers where in the Bible it says this.  I am having trouble finding that verse

BTW the money I give to my church has already been taxed by the Government. 



What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Jordan Yerman
First Flagged at 11:35 AM, Sep 27, 2008 by Jordan Yerman
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from