Money grabbing Paul Burrell, who still claims to be
"Diana's rock" can be seen laughing on a covert video recording as he tells a
'friend': “When you swear an oath, you
have to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. I told the
truth as far as I could — but I didn’t tell the whole truth. Perjury is not a
nice thing to have to contemplate. I was very naughty and I made a couple of red
herrings, and I couldn’t help doing it. I know you shouldn’t play with justice
and I know it’s illegal and I realise how serious it is.”
The Coroner to the Inquest, Lord Justice
Scott-Baker has now ordered a copy of the video recording to be handed-over for
investigation and Burrell may face criminal charges of perjury after admitting
he lied to the Inquest and deceived both the Coroner and the jury.
At one
point Burrell makes a shocking statement about the Coroner: "But he put me in an unenviable position that coroner,
because he made me, he said to me I had to report the conversation I had with
the Queen, and that coversation was three hours long. And I wasn't about to sit
there and divulge everything she said to me, I wasn't going to do
that.
So I said, do I have to answer that question and he said 'yes, you
do'. He said, 'what did the Queen say to you?' I said she showed 'great concern' that
was all I was prepared to say. And he
still let me get away with it."
Serious
questions are now being asked as to whether Paul Burrell made a secret deal with
the Queen to bury 'embarrassing details' and Burrell answered these suspicions
on tape by saying: "Well, she's the
Queen." In his view it was better to keep his
mouth shut about certain 'things' and not incur the wrath of the Royal Family
and the Oxbridge
Faction at MI6, rather than apparently sink with Mohamed Al Fayed. But who
is sinking now?
There is now no doubt at all that Burrell has chosen to
conceal certain vital details from the jury in order to preserve the continued
rule of the House of
Windsor rather than tell the truth and allow the jurors to make up
their own minds about his 'revelations'.
His 'testimony' at the Inquest on 14
January was shot through with holes and convenient gaps as proved by the
professional cross-examination of Michael Mansfield QC.
If it is proved
that Burrell has committed perjury, and the tape is evidence enough, he should
be arrested and questioned. But how likely is it that he would stand trial and
the Establishment run the risk of yet more dirty secrets being exposed in open
court?
And yet what is more shocking is that Burrell had the temerity to
contact the editor of News Alliance several days ago through the YouTube channel
to protest his 'innocence' of lying.
http://ca.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=AJuWH6QwcZc
In three posts on YouTube in response to negative
comments left about him by YouTube users, Burrell wrote: 'The reason that a secret was not told at the inquest
was because of the fact that the secret that I was told was that of which I
cannot tell a single soul. I promised her I wouldn't say anything.? As for you
not trusting me, perhaps thats because you don't know me.
I have not lied constantly I'm a honest
man and it just seems as though I'm lying
due to the press making things up and that fact that I'm trying to give an
insight as to how? the princess was without actually giving away any real
secrets as such.
The princess was not murdered, she simply died in a car
accident and I am a firm believer in that as are many. Do you really think if
one wanted to murder the princess they'd do it in such a shabby way? Come on
people they're far more intelligent than that.'
Now everyone knows that Burrell believes Diana was killed
in an 'accident' because he admits to having made a deal with the
Monarchy!
The editor of News Alliance asked Burrell for an interview but
he so far not taken up our offer.


