Petraeus: Iraq-Style Surge Wouldn't Work in Afghanistan

by Roy C | March 14, 2009 at 09:18 pm
144 views | 10 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

General Petreus | Photo 02

General Petreus | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by Roy C

Videos

18_02_09 - Operation Diesel Seizes £50m of Heroin in Afghanistan

see larger video

sourced by Roy C

18_02_09 - Operation Diesel Seizes £50m of Heroin in Afghanistan

There has been much talk of this increase in the number of soldiers in Afghanistan as being "a surge".

Apparently, going by Petraeus's definitions and evaluations, this increase in troops is more like an escalation, a word oft-used in the Vietnam War, especially during Lyndon Johnson's administration.

Petraeus' did not write off the possibility of victory, but the general said that the biggest problem was infrastructure, and the need to not appear as conquerors in Afghanistan.

The Taliban has taken back huge swaths of Afghanistan, while  narco-trafficking keeps growing as the source of the funds needed on the part of the Taliban to conduct war.

There is to be a UN sponsored event to try to come to terms with a policy that would be effective against the Afghan heroin trade. Hillary Clinton has invited Iran to participate, as Iran suffers from this problem as well.


EAST HARTFORD, Conn. -- The commander of the U.S. Central Command said Friday that an Iraq-style surge cannot be a solution to the problems in Afghanistan.

Gen. David Petraeus, speaking before about 800 people at an event sponsored by the World Affairs Council, acknowledged that the situation in Afghanistan has been spiraling downward and is likely to get worse before it gets better.

In a speech that also touched on issues ranging from the nuclear threat in Iraq to pirates off Somalia, Petraeus said more resources are needed in Afghanistan, both military and especially civil to help build a stable government there.

"The secretary of defense and I are among the biggest champions with members of Congress for increasing the resourcing for the State Department and the Agency for International Development," he said.

The U.S.-led invasion of Aghanistan ousted the Islamist Taliban regime in 2001, but the militant movement has regained control of large swaths of the country. U.S. and NATO forces have been unable to reverse the gains.

Petraeus blamed the problems on a resilient "syndicate of extremists," financing from the drug trade, safe havens in Pakistan and frustration with the slow development of the country's fledgling government.

"We must help our Afghan partners create the breathing space that'll allow the people to stand up for themselves as the Iraqi people did during the awakening movements there," he said. "That also will allow the government to begin working for its people and begin providing essential services, instead of just struggling to survive."

Last month, President Barack Obama ordered 17,000 more U.S. troops to bolster the record 38,000 American forces already in Afghanistan, a likely down payment on the request by ground commanders to double the U.S. force to 60,000.

But Petraeus said a large military surge like the one in Iraq would not work in Afghanistan because there is not enough infrastructure on the ground to handle one, and because it is imperative that Afghans not view coalition forces as conquerors.

"You do need to tenaciously pursue the enemy and the extremists," Petraeus said. "But you also need to be building, and to develop, and to assist, and to help and to partner."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Amy Judd

Interesting, I always find what Petraeus says to be informative and easy to understand.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Amy Judd
First Flagged at 5:59 PM, Mar 17, 2009 by Amy Judd
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (10)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from