Police acquitted over NY shooting

by amyjudd | April 25, 2008 at 11:43 am | 438 views | 5 comments

The reaction to the news that the policemen who killed Sean Bell had been acquitted, was one of anger, disappointment, and frustration.

The wail that came up from the crowd was as if they heard that Sean Bell had died again.

"No!" they shouted, while dozens of people, wearing Bell's face on hats, T-shirts and buttons, burst into sobs.

The scene unfolded outside the courthouse Friday as three police officers were cleared of all charges in the 2006 shooting of Bell, who died in a hail of 50 bullets on his wedding day.

Hundreds of friends of Bell and others wanted vindication for what they called a racially motivated shooting, and they reacted with tears and explosive anger to the officers' acquittal.

Many people in the predominantly black crowd began reciting other cases where black New Yorkers were shot by police, and the officers, they said, got away with it.

"This was a disgrace, what happened today," shouted Calvin Hutton, a Harlem resident. "We prayed for a different result, but we got the same old bull——."

The three police officers who shot dead an unarmed man hours before his wedding in New York in 2006 have been acquitted.

Sean Bell, 23, who was black, was shot as he left a strip club in the suburb of Queens in November 2006.

Two detectives, Michael Oliver and Gescard Isnora, faced charges of manslaughter. A third, Marc Cooper, had been accused of reckless endangerment.

The case had generated accusations of police racism and brutality, and there were angry protests outside the court.

Bell's fiancee, Nicole Paultre Bell, walked out of the packed courtroom as soon as Supreme Court Justice Arthur Cooperman cleared the three officers of all charges.

"The people have not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that each defendant was not justified" in firing, the judge said.

The verdict was welcomed by a spokesman for the police union.

The defendants had opted to have a judge decide the case rather than a jury, arguing that pre-trial publicity could have prejudiced jurors.

Undercover

Bell and two friends were apparently trying to drive away from the Kalua club when the incident occurred early on the morning of 25 November 2006.

A crowd gathered outside the court house while the verdict was being read, and many were angry at the outcome.

Updated, 10:55 a.m. | The crowd is all but dispersed. A few stragglers are leaving with their signs. Some are still talking to reporters with television cameras. Most of the people still here are reporters and the most vocal activists. The Rev. Al Sharpton, the Bell family and other figures in the case are long gone. Traffic is back to normal on Queens Boulevard.

10:10 a.m. | Mr. Sharpton, Sean Bell’s parents, other family members and supporters marched out of the courthouse a short time ago and left without making a statement. As the procession passed through the throng of Bell supporters, journalists and police officers, a young man briefly forced an elbow against a court officer’s neck, but there were no arrests. There was briefly some pushing and shoving, but officers moved in and the crowd calmed down.

9:50 a.m. | The crowd continues to express anger for the cameras, but is relatively calm as supporters of Sean Bell’s family wait for them and Mr. Sharpton to emerge to make a statement.
“They got away with murder in there,” said Calvin B. Hunt, a man in the crowd, which continued to spill into two of the three westbound lanes of Queens Boulevard, slowing traffic to a crawl.
William Hargraves, 48, an electrician from Harlem brought his 12-year-old son, Kamau, to the courthouse this morning. He said this verdict parallels the outcome of previous police shootings of black men. “Connect the bullets,” he said. “How many times did they shoot Diallo? Forty-one times. They were acquitted. They got a pension.”
His son said: “I think it’s not right, because they shot him 50 times. They knew he was hurt, and they kept shooting him. He didn’t even have a gun.”

Add a comment Comments (5)

Karen Hatter
good stuff:

Thank you for posting this, Amy.

Unfortunately, in the United States, in most cities, all that is required for a police officer to use deadly force is the 'belief' that he or she or their partner is in danger. That standard is a dangerous criterion in moments requiring split second decision making.

In this case, the fact that one of the officers, emptied his gun, reloaded and continued firing, seemed to indicate some type of wrong doing, minimally, on his part. None of the officers reported being fired upon.

Since the case was tried before the judge alone, although we citizens are supposed to believe otherwise, the judge, just like a jury, comes to sit on the bench, relying on his own life experience, where most often those coming before his court are found guilty, and his own perceptions of life on the streets. In most cases, there is a natural, maybe even, an unconscious, bias in favor of police officers on trial.

The request to avoid a jury trial was a standard, legal tactic but, it assured the police officers on trial would not possibly have any possible jury, whose members themselves or their relatives or friends who'd had negative experiences with police, be seated on that jury.

Given the fact that the officers were undercover and out of uniform, and any actions or inaction on the parts of Sean Bell and his friends to respond to them, with Bell's friends saying the officers did not identify themselves and the officers telling the exact opposite story, all that was left were the only facts that could be verified, that being 51 shots were fired into the car and no gun was found on the victims or in the bullet ridden vehicle.

It would seem, to most logical people, that something excessive had occurred there.

amyjudd

Very insightful comments, thanks.

Karen Hatter

A link to Justice for Sean.net.

jordan

Urbano411 has some additional commentary that's worth checking out.

swan lake samba girl via mobile

It was extremely crowded, and unlike every other day of the trial, spectators were not allowed into the courtroom. After the verdict was announced, via a reporter who ran outside to tell us, people were crying, screaming profanities at the police, calling black and Hispanic officers guarding the courthouse "sell-outs for money," and expressing their disbelief that there were acquitalls on all counts. Protests ensued. Everything was peaceful.
-- Tonya Plank

swan lake samba girl via mobile has contributed a photo to this story.

Sign In or Join Add a comment

Your email is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

April 25, 2008 at 11:43 am by amyjudd, 438 views, 5 comments

is reporting from

closeSign in to NowPublic