Political Parties and Tea Parties

by aurealeus | April 19, 2009 at 07:43 am

272 views | 14 Recommendations | 2 comments

Wake up America! There is a choice to be made. Americans are free to choose between having a nation built upon an inherited fundamental foundation with strong ideals and justice which was envisioned by our founders or it is free to choose a path immersed with a politically controlled global agenda where self-determination, democracy and freedoms are dependent upon the will of geo-economics and its overseers.

This and similar propagated long-held, anti-national solutions, that are finally surfacing, filled with - 'submit or else' undertones that in itself, should be perceived as sinister and against what America has stood for over three centuries, especially where it is contended that America and other nations have no other choice but the need to embrace the geo-economic strategist movement towards a globally dominating geopolitical agenda just because of some mysterious underlying gravitational pull. Therefore, just because we enter what is only philosophically perceived to be problematic in the "future,"(or now) these alternate ideals should not be misconstrued as truth or that essentially there should no longer be need for nation states or only a one-world-view.

The reality is, there is no future or the present for that matter, Present and future is but for an instant when after finally reaching it, becomes the past. Only in the past is there any validity to the perception of true reality and what is achievable because it contains a historical record of our successes and failures in obtaining it... and if America's past, and present-future is any indication of where America is truly headed as presented by the globalist agenda, then America (and the world) is in for another bumpy ride never before experienced as in any revolution or world war.

Public and political debate, such as those being spurred by the present day Tea Parties between American citizens over American issues working towards American solutions benefiting American citizens has always been the democratic ideology of America, as shown throughout history, contributing to the growth and strength of our nation. Unfortunately, there will always be those who prefer to sensationalize any public outcry as silly partisan extremism in attempts to fog over the issues in promotion of their own biased viewpoints, many times, leading to other less desirable results.

Just because there is present opposition and debate over various issues (as has been since the founding of the nation) relating to cultures, economic systems, citizen rights, national security, taxes, etc, etc., does not prove that dissident ideologies are out of time and out of place or that we must succumb to the global agenda. It does prove however, that the American Spirit is alive and well and the present day system of governing is out of sync with the will of the people. Obviously, the people are finally waking up and voicing their concerns in an attempt to direct change according to that will.

Because turnouts during the "Tea-Parties" have been "estimated" around 500,000, this does not mean that only 500,000 support the action or that it is the total amount that are disgruntled. I'm no statistician, but if this number is indicative of only a small percentage of Americans (say, 5-7%, similar to a typical return in response to direct-mail advertising) then the numbers of Americans feeling disenfranchised are most likely much, much higher and will only continue to grow as the voices of the people go unheard and needs unmet .

The problems America faces are clear… and not primarily due to choices American citizens have made but are obviously caused by choices corrupt and inept politicians and bureaucrats have made on BOTH sides of the isle, that have been and continue to be… dominated through corporate control and iniquitous central banking systems.

The choices America faces are also clear. There is no realistic need for returning-to an earlier time or to accept ideologies that promote the paradigm of a world socialist view that serve only an elite minority resulting in stripped-down national-sovereignty. The solutions lie within the will of responsible people by working within (or changing) the framework of OUR laws and towards removing Bench Decisions that have created bad-law favoring mainly minority interests, in addition to repealing distorted personal rights-amendments within the United States Constitution that have been tolerated for too long and abused by corporate and special interests.

The United States Constitution is one of the most brilliant documents ever created. It is the roadmap to true democratic freedom. Once it is gone, it is gone forever. Please don’t allow this to happen to what is America and the American Spirit. Resist Globalism and GET INVOLVED NOW, before it’s too late.

I choose to fight for the America we all know and love with mutual goals of freedom and sovereignty. How ‘bout U?

0 See all footage | View Slideshow

Share: email story | add to any | | facebook | stumbleupon

recommend This comment thread is now closed

Roy C

at 13:14 on April 19th, 2009

Calls to resist "globalization" are simply calls to resist "runaway globaliztion", to be distinguished from a more evolutionary, thought-through process of globalization that respects boundaries, identities, and the autonomy of sovereign people.

"Collectively applying our minds" is good when they have a basis for common application in universal aspects of culture, such as objective reasoning, and objective morality, or what we call "conscience", a word whose roots come from "with knowledge".

When "collectively applying our minds" comes from a place of subjectivity and illusion, possession by drives which have yet to be balanced by their counter-drives, then we head off the abyss like a bunch of lemmings.

Right now, the "collective minds" are basically the minds of governments and business who, unable to solve the problems of an ethical production system, a system that is ethical in its distribution of wealth, the rewards, and one which respects the environment, the Mother of us all., have decided that one huge, colossal Humpty Dumpty of a trading system is what is called for.

We see the folly of this in what has recently happened: the failure of Wall Street experts to patrol and police their own investments and the fallout of terrible economic consequences throughout the world.

The truth is, that the economies most separated from Wall Street have fared the best here, not the one most aligned with "collective minds".

The elites also want this world-control because they are basically power-driven. They talk "love", but their own character structure is such that they have been willing to sacrifice all manner of their humanity in the attempt to get the narcissistic validation of being elected to high office.

This drive to validation is so great that their critics are always their enemies, even while successive American administrations only seem to compound the errors of their predecessors. This is the surest sign of narcissistic self-involvement.

Eliminating the capacity to object by undermining national boundaries, labor laws, environmental regulations, or by claiming the right to speak for the people of the world in forums where the people of the world have never been allowed to elect anyone, the elites can continue to take the world forward to its subjection to their programs, their power, a spiritually nefarious ambition.

Ironically, as the world decentralizes industrial production, the need to trade over long distances will be lessened and, as we enter an era of high energy prices, long-distnce trade will actually slow down or be severely reduced because it will simply be too expensive. Then, the breakneck globalization we have been experiencing will stop.

aurealeus

at 03:21 on April 21st, 2009

Thank you for your comments. Perhaps some clarification is needed in response to my call “to resist" so that there is no question regarding what the message intends in regards to my overall opinion.

While I do not believe that “we” are the architects of globalism, (that designation rightfully belongs to the central and world banking system) I do understand that global economics play a part in the direction of America and will continue to do so well into the future, but this is nothing new where trade is concerned so why the rush to accept a globalist doctrine?

I believe in having trading partners with and in all nations of the world where possible. Some advantages include stimulating local economies and visa versa and can have many educational, technological and cultural exchange benefits. Global Trade is equally beneficial to less developed economies allowing impoverished nations to thrive and benefit on many more fronts. There are other benefits too numerous to mention here. I am of the mindset that the negative outweighs the positive benefits over the long term.

The problems with globalization in my opinion are the controlling and deconstructing effects it has on national sovereignty, liberty, politics, local laws and policy making and interestingly, the economy itself… as shown through the current financial stalemate worldwide. The problem is not for lack of labor, products or services, nor is it for lack of money. All are plentiful but are being held hostage by those in control of these items, bringing the world to its knees.

Inflation, deflation, scarcities, etc., are not due to normal trade activities but are caused by manipulation of people and products through a monetary system controlled by a minority, as if we were pawns on a chessboard, allowing us to move forward only when those not elected, allow it. Is this the type of globalism we want or need? Is this Free Trade? Is this freedom? When I call others to “resist”, this is the part of globalism I encourage people to resist. Free trade is good. Slavery in exchange for trade is not.

As noted by Hegel, “history teaches us that man learns nothing from history.” Globalism is just a new term coined during the last century to disguise its true name - Empire. Let’s see, how many can we recollect? Spanish, British, Roman, German, Russian, French, Dutch, Egyptian, etc., etc. There have been hundreds throughout history and the list goes on and on. Imperial globalism is a proven failed system that only benefits those in power during their reign, until all returns back towards normalcy after an enslaved people have had enough. This outrage is being shown through the present Tea Party demonstrations albeit too late.

Today, many nation states have already accepted unionizing (I.e., Unions of Europe, Asia, South America, Africa and the recently defunct Soviet Union) but will ultimately fail as shown with the most recent collapse of the Soviet Union. Because it is unacceptable to most Americans and Canadians, a North American Union will most likely be bypassed, opting directly to join a global union of nations as promoted and supported by our latest puppet government.

Empires come and go and so will this latest New World Order as shown by the fall of all the others before. While many people will (and do) embrace this so-called new order of globalism , it will not last and in the end, I believe nations will once again revert back to the old national ideals that once served them well. Just my opinion based upon some historical facts.

Not until people realize that true wealth does not exist in the bankers paper notes but is the result of one’s own labor, they will remain enslaved and indebted to the financial elite.