NP Rank:
Political Surprise: McCain & Palin Move Me to Tears--and Why
I cried today.
Over politics.
Now, that was a surprise. I've been through many kinds of political experiences. I've managed a campaign, worked on several. I've coached a candidate through tough forums and issues, including personal and professional attacks that included outright lies about her.
Yes, her. My most recent campaign battles have been to support a woman candidate. Whatever you do, I told her, do *not* let them see you sweat. Never let your voice go up in stress, never appear defensive, and honey, never cry no matter what they call you.
I've taught her and other women how to combat sexism. I've taught women and men, too, how to deal with the media and the public, without losing their composure, even under fire.
I've had to do those battles myself, for decades. I recall applying for a job after marrying and moving to a new town. Lonely, missing my journalism job back home, I was next on the wait list for a job at the local newspaper but needed something to do in my new community.
The job I applied for was way below my educational and skill levels. But I went for it anyway, just to get out of the house and start getting involved. And I figured that I could then use that job to build on in that organization--the town's Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber, I could see by reviewing their offerings, was in sore need of a good public relations and outreach program.
So, after visiting to browse and pick up their offerings, like other new residents, I went home and called in to inquire about the job, I asked about any additional materials they might like to have in my application packet. Oh, the chamber director told me, I couldn't apply for this job. It was a man's job.
The job was that of an office assistant to the chamber director, basically a glorified go-fer. But he needed a man. Any man, apparently. Just not a woman. Even an over-qualified woman.
So I sent in my package. Everything was honest and up-to-date. The name? My first two initials with my last name.
They went nuts over the application. Couldn't wait to talk to this person. I cheerfully took the message from the secretary giving the date and time for Mr. A.B. Applicant's interview.
Then I showed up for that meeting. 5'2", 110 pounds, long black hair, heels, hose and a bright red dress.
Oh! exclaimed the secretary. I couldn't see Mr. So-and-So, as he had an appointment to interview a candidate for the job.
I smiled.
I know, I said. I'm his appointment. Thank you.
And I walked past her into his office, without waiting to be conveyed in. As his intercom buzzer went nuts, I walked up to his desk, stuck out my hand and said hello.
By the time he answered the buzzer, it was all over. He'd been snookered, and he knew it. And there I sat,comfortably, smiling, enthusiastic. Gracious.
Secretly enjoying watching him thrash. Enjoying it when the secretary ran in to apologize for having his interview schedule interrupted by "this girl"--and then turned scarlet.
I remember that. Of course, I got the job, and in six weeks had transformed it, my way, and gotten promoted. That's right--promoted in a job that I wasn't qualified to even interview for, because I'm a woman.
I remember all the times someone tried to shove me aside because I'm--not a man. I'm a woman. Not quite as good, you know--or so they've said.
I remember all the times women have been shoved aside because they're women. So when Sen. John McCain picked gutsy, independent Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, I was happy. Very, very happy.
And so I went about my day, happy. Admiring of McCain's maverick ways. Intellectually, I'd processed that information--McCain picks Palin.
Later, after getting back to my home office, I got to watch the video of McCain's introduction of Palin, and her acceptance speech.
It's great video. I clapped and cheered, tossing in a HOO-RAH here and there! Even my Welsh Corgi, Owain Glendower, got excited and woofed his approval.
Then McCain said: " I am especially proud to say, in the week we celebrate the anniversary of women's suffrage..." and to my surprise, the waterworks opened. With that one phrase and the reminder of the passing of the 19th amendment in 1920, McCain and his gutsy choice tapped into the decades of battles for a truly equal America.
Palin herself gave a gracious nod to Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton, noting the "18 million cracks" Clinton had put in the glass ceiling. HOO-RAH, I said, and Owain barked. And then I cried again.
Ferraro, sadly enough for her, was teamed with a seemingly-weak Walter Mondale, going up against the popular Ronald Reagan. A gutsy lady herself, Ferraro spoke one too many truths in Clinton's campaign, and found herself nominally back on the outside.
This time, though, Palin is teamed with one of the strongest all-American candidates since the Gipper. And, she's cut from a tough Alaska wilderness fabric that slices across normal political labels and divisions. It's fair to say that she's been admired by, and sometimes hated by, Democrats and Republicans alike.
She's done it all: soccer mom, wife, public servant, and definitely not part of the "good old boy" or corporate monolith structures. Palin said "no" to the Bridge to Nowhere. She's said "no" when it was in the common good to do so.
And did anyone notice that she's a woman, you know, one of those soft" creatures? She's one of those creatures who weren't allowed to vote until 1920 in the U.S. One of those creatures who even until past the mid-part of this century weren't "allowed" to own property in their own right. The women who first went in to get home mortagages in their own names, or open their own businesses--instead of "helping" hubby--have their own stories, too.
Clinton, I'm convinced, couldn't get past Obama's race card, and the abiding belief that it's just much better to have a man at the helm than risk having a woman steering the ship of state. The Democrats couldn't even stomach the female Clinton as a vice-presidential choice. On the other hand, McCain has made it clear that he considers Palin to be a great choice for any level of leadership.
Imagine that.
And she didn't even have to send in a resume that hid her first name.
My tears, I realized, were of remembrance, and honoring of earlier women suffragettes and feminists. The tears were also ones of joy.
They marked something wonderful: a return to a belief that things really can change, for all Americans, in a good, positive way.
No matter what your gender.
Is America really ready to put a woman in the vice-presidential chair? Is America really ready to face the idea of a woman, should it become necessary, succeeding to the office of President of the United States?
Listening to Palin's speech, and the resounding cheers and applause for her key ideas, I cried. Because once again, after having been battered many times, my heart again believes that a woman can overcome sexism, can overcome racism, can overcome all the -isms that divide us -- and that America can, and will, stand up for women as equal people.
I agree with Palin--women can shatter that glass ceiling for once and for all.
And that idea is worth some celebratory tears.
Crowd Power
-
nukegingrich
Mccomb, Mississippi, United States -
Milieunet
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands -
OhioNewsBureau
Columbus, Ohio, United States -
Laniebird5000
Fairbanks, Alaska, United States















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (35)
at 17:12 on August 29th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's great stuff.
at 18:26 on August 29th, 2008
Thanks, Rhonda. It was a good one to write.
at 17:20 on August 29th, 2008
How do you know Owain's barking was approval?
at 18:27 on August 29th, 2008
We speak each other's language. ;} Thanks for the flag. I'll make sure Owain knows he's been noted. If he has any disagreements with my comments, he'll be in touch.
at 17:22 on August 29th, 2008
Brava.
at 18:28 on August 29th, 2008
Thanks, NG.
at 17:25 on August 29th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff.
A very moving piece about a historical day. I enjoyed reading it and felt quite inspired by it.
I think this election in general will be a time of firsts, no matter who ends up becoming president and vice-president.
at 18:29 on August 29th, 2008
Amy, your comments are so generous--thank you for them and the flag. Yes, this is a historic race, for so many reasons.
at 17:30 on August 29th, 2008
I was driven to tears too, over the stupidity of McBush and Palin and driven to tears of joy over the fact that this will certainly assure the election of Obama and Biden
at 17:36 on August 29th, 2008
Please keep your comments respectful about others' opinions.
Thanks
at 18:29 on August 29th, 2008
Thank you, Amy, for working so hard to ensure that discussions are kept at a good level. You are appreciated.
at 18:56 on August 29th, 2008
I gotta agree with the master on this one ...
Who in their right mind is gonna elect a 72-year old to the office of POTUS whose got a VP with the vast experience of 13 years in Alaskan municipal politics ?
I don't think her good looks and youth are going to make up the difference here, sorry ...
This decision has made Obama the next president of the United States ...
at 19:05 on August 29th, 2008
Emilio, I think that the discussion of inexperience really will boomerang back on the Democratic presidential candidate, Mr. Inexperience Obama!
To say that her good looks would make a difference would be a sexist thing, and one that I would disagree with. I hope that you can see beyond someone's looks.
As far as age goes, well, Obama's camp opened the door on age statements by attacking McCain for his age. Then Obama picks a not really young guy for his #2, so it's pot, kettle, black.
And you might be surprised at the experience Palin, who's a governor, has racked up. And the funny thing is this--Obama's camp keeps screaming they want change, and something outside the "Beltway" politics.
So, the Republicans offer that up, in Palin. And then it's well..we can't have *that* change, we need someone who's really inside the old-school politics.
McCain's strategy was, I think incredibly good in picking Palin, not only for her attributes but because it tosses back all the Obama campaign cliches! This race is going to be fun.
at 19:37 on August 29th, 2008
The argument of to young to inexperience was made earlier in regard to B. H. Obama as he became the candidate for the Democrats. Ironically those same people that rampaged over Obama then, are now adamant defenders of the Republican Vice Presidential candidate, not being to Young nor to inexperienced. Just another prove at double standards and bios and the absurdity of Politics.
Alaska is not to be compared with Chicago and yet it is.
at 04:13 on August 30th, 2008
Politics can sometimes be the theater of the absurd, Paschen!
The thing is that the Obama camp simply can't throw "too inexperienced" at Palin because they've touted Obama's lack of experience as a good thing. ;}
at 18:23 on August 29th, 2008
This political contest has boiled down to the physical attributes of the candidates more than I think is reasonable for adult voters who are deciding on the future of our nation and other countries, to a larger degree than I like.
Congratulations. Your story was well written, and McCain's choice of Palin as his running mate was probably the wisest political move he has made so far. However, I sincerely regret that the race and gender of our candidates is given such weight. I do not feel that this assessment of candidates means that we have progressed in any significant way. It certainly is not Christlike to think, "I want the one with a womb," or "I want the one with most recent African DNA." (I say "most recent," because scientists seem to concur with the Bible that we all have a common mom.)
So here we go again with the contest of "who looks most like me?" instead of concentrating on the issues. But before feminists get too excited, please read below:
CNN reports: "Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency. Gov. Palin shares John McCain's commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush's failed economic policies. That's not the change we need; it's just more of the same," Obama spokeswoman Adrianne March said.
Mary Neal
at 18:31 on August 29th, 2008
Thanks, Mary. I think that CNN's coverage only betrays their duplicity and the fact that so much of the media actually have become propagandists for the Obama camp, sad to say. Palin was actually gone up against "big oil."
I wish we could outgrow age-ism, sexism, racism, and any other isms. We're all just people.
at 22:17 on August 29th, 2008
well written about your feelings. However, she is still not the environmentalist you would think. I would suggest reading up on her politics related to the environment because if she were an environmentalist, I think that she would have done more - and wouldn't have been such a liability for the McCain Camp.
Source: news.yahoo.com
Source: news.yahoo.com
Source: news.yahoo.com
So, I while I understand your feelings about how proud you are that once again a woman was nominated to be in the White House in some form, if you previously supported Hillary, I would remind you that these two women were not created equal on the issues.
at 04:16 on August 30th, 2008
I'm sure that she and Hillary do not agree on many issues, and are not alike in many ways. (Women aren't cut from a cookie cutter mold, any more than men candidates are.) And I'm not sure that I said that I thought Palin was a Greenie, either. ;}
Thanks for the nice comment at the start. I think Palin should be given a chance to be heard. She's no dummy, and she has good things to offer. We'll all just have to see how all four candidates perform between now and November.
at 18:37 on August 29th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff.
I was always under the impression you were a man PEP...you sure had me fooled. In regards to the article, I find it welcoming that the Republicans finally came out of the dungeons for all these years and picked a female running mate. The Democrats have been at this battle for a long time. It is refreshing that Republicans finally got that message....and its grand. The problem I see is we still have that anchor around our necks in discerning who comes first? Do we elect a black President or do we elect a woman female Vice President. Of course it is a little different in that she is not running for President, but the Republicans are putting something back on the Political stage that most people were happy to see leave. And that was deciding between a Black Candidate or a Woman. I find that jockeying quite distressful to the voting public, and a big turn off, because now most voters leave the booth knowing they did something good, and at the same time doing something bad.....no matter how you slice the bread.
People see that McCain did this for Hillary voters....but people are also going to know that Sarah Palin is not the Presidential Nominee, something women in this counntry know is the real prize in all this. It only reminds us that really women have lost this time, and our only recourse is to bring the first Black Presidnet into Office. McCains little plan may certainly backfire big-time. I find it unwise to pit our racial prejudices against our gender prejudices in an election. It is far better to not wage cock fights in politics. Who is keeping this prejudices issue alive...is McCain when he chose Sarah Palin.
Now the only true winner in all this would be a black woman nominated as President of the Untied States....then we don't have those sensitive decisions, leaving Americans to choose between Zeus or Leda.
How it plays out is not seen right now, but I assure you pitting these racial and gender choices before us...makes the process of Democracy quite an embarrassment....Especially when we know we are trying to get Taliban to change their ideals toward women in the world, and getting people to shun black prejudices....in tackling the black Muslim problems as well. http://bibleprobe.com/blackmuslims.htm
McCain and the Democrats just do not consider the real message we are sending by pitting them against each other. tsk.
at 18:39 on August 29th, 2008
So why did you assume I'm male? :)
To my surprise, I learned awhile back that the Republicans actually have empowered more minority office-holders (look at the makeup of the current cabinet) than Democrats!
There's no other way to have elections, I think, than to have groups of people who put forward candidates and a set of ideas. The essence of democracy is, I think, the good things that come out of the free, frank, and open discussion of ideas and options. Kinda like striking the tinder to get a spark against the cold night.
And although it may seem distasteful to you to have a choice between a black man as president and a white woman as vice-president, those choices are the things that make us stronger in the long run. After all, people complained endlessly that old white men ran things for too long (true).
So now people will have to choose between differing types of people across a wide range vs. just different Anglo-Saxon guys. And long term, that's healthy.
And I think that many people, men and women, were not happy to see Obama and the current Democratic leadership shove Clinton aside. Had he had true grace and an understanding of larger issues, he would have grabbed her as VP and been well-nigh unbeatable in some circles. Instead, after attacking McCain for age and length of time in the political insider's circle, he chose an old white guy who's a long-time member of the political insider's circle! He blew what could have been his transcendant moment in exchange for his own ego, IMHO.
Thanks for the comments and flag!
at 18:34 on August 29th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff. Thanks for this story - I meant to flag it. Your article promotes stimulating conversation. Don't you just hate it that racism and sexism loom so LARGE in the minds of many voters?
Mary
at 18:43 on August 29th, 2008
Mary, I saw your comment as a flag, thanks for doing that! Yes, yes, I hate racism, sexism, and age-ism, and then the reverse of them, playing the cards on the other side saying "do this or that or you prove that you're ...fill in the ...ism."
I got to be removed, as a youngster, to the deep South during segregation days after being raised early on in an integrated environment, meaning racial and religious integration. It was a shock that propelled me into being a real scrappy fighter against the -isms.
at 18:56 on August 29th, 2008
Pep, you use to have a picture of a male Iroquois Indian pic. That is what made me think you were a man.
And your idea that Republicans are giving us something new is a complete fabrication. John McCain is the nominee he is the same white anglo-saxon white guy. Nothing but the same ole same ole.....and why? It's because of the military and the atomic bomb. They refuse to hand it over.
You said....After all, people complained endlessly that old white men ran things for too long (true).So now people will have to choose between differing types of people across a wide range vs. just different Anglo-Saxon guys. And long term, that's healthy.
Your statement is quite unhealthy I think, and may I say not correct.
at 18:59 on August 29th, 2008
Actually, the picture was of my friend Wes Studi, a Cherokee Indian, and very fine actor.
Although we may disagree, I'm fairly sure that I wouldn't call your opinion "unhealthy." Just...different.
So what's unhealthy about having a wide choice of people to choose from for leadership? Should we only have white men? Black men? Hispanic females? I'm not sure why enlarging our choices, and therefore our opportunities to many more people, would be a bad thing.
Who would you kick out and not allow to participate as a candidate? Is that what I understand that you're proposing? I say--let everyone who wants to have their chance, regardless of their race or gender.
at 19:29 on August 29th, 2008
What I am saying is McCain is the same old anglo-saxon who claim the Republicans are changing. He is no change. The Republicans offer nothing of change to the Presidential Nominee. He has done something by choosing Sarah Palin that Democrats did a long time ago when they nominated Geraldine Ferraro. Republicans hardly have introduced change. The only thing they have done in this selection, is admit they have been behind the times and outside the real American Political thought process.
And why is it, that Americans are never given the chance to choose the Vice President? Why is it always a selection process by the nominee? I think the people have the right to vote and choose for a VP nominee...along with having the right to vote for Cabinet members and Supreme Court Justices. Really America lives in what the Chinese call the Abdication System, where Democracy does more selections than voting from the people. See my article.....China is the Origin of Democracy.
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/china-origin-democracy-news-opinion
Of course there is a wide range of choices, but we Americans are only given 2 parties who possibly could win.
I call that Corporate Control of the election process, something Americans would like to do away with. There should be many different people who can run for office. But having the Corporations build this pitting of race against gender is not real or legitimate to the wide choices we could really have. Where is my black woman candidate? Where is my chinese candidate, my Latino candidate, my Mexican Candidate, and Nonviolence candidate? There is no legitimate candidate process...it is controlled and you know it.
at 19:47 on August 29th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Well written PEP!
I'm curious as to what would be the outcome if both candidates were female with one being black and one being white. How then would America vote? Would it matter who is more qualified, who is Republican or Democrat? With the gender card being euchred would it come down to race?
I wonder because this election seems to be all about gender and race while the country is in desperate need of real leadership after almost eight years of total mismanagement.
at 12:14 on August 30th, 2008
Thanks, Mike. I think that America's sociological growth is being tested, and more growth is coming! (Or so I hope.) I don't think that it would come down to race--or maybe I just hope it wouldn't. I think that when it's time to get in the voting booth, some *will* vote race, some will vote gender, some will vote party, some will vote single-issue, and some will evaluate each candidate across a wide spectrum of issues and then make a decision based on "what I think is the best balance of all, pro and con." I try to put myself in that last camp as much as possible.
A lot of campaign strategy for all politicians is to target the single-issue and large-issue groups. So that if you're, say, for gun ownership, then you'll be steered to gun rights candidates. If you're pro or anti abortion rights, then you'll be steered that way.
I think our responsibility, and challenge, as voters, is to not allow ourselves to be steered, but to do the research and work to put our hand on the captain's wheel. I've gone off candidates when I've caught them overtly being patronizing, dumbing down, and/or trying to change their pitch according to which group they're talking to right then. The last is what finally put me off Obama.
at 19:54 on August 29th, 2008
PEP, I like this story. It's good stuff.
I do not however think that H. Clinton was out of the Job because she is a Woman.
I was against her my self after her arrogance and sore temper showed even though I did support her at first. Obama I did support as well at first and was rather disappointed, however he is still the lesser evil of the two. The Republican quiet frankly do not have a much better team or worth. I rather see Mickey Mouse as President of the US at the moment then any of the candidates running and that has nothing to do with race, gender or religion. Now Pouwel would have been a good Presidential choice or the Grand doughtier of Eisenhower.
at 21:08 on August 29th, 2008
Being a southeast alaska resident I wholeheartedly agree with your piecechange about. I just wish it were a more qualified woman. BTW she only opposed one of the two bridges to nowhere. She was all for the one near her part of the state.