NP Rank:
The Politics of Assassination

Noting both alleged Holocaust museum shooter James von Brunn, charged in the murder of Stephen P. Johns and anti abortionist Scott Roeder, charged in the death of Dr. George Tiller, were what is described as "active extremists" long before the crimes they are alleged to have committed, the author of Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from Margins to the Mainstream, Leonard Zeskind, warns of the danger of dismissal of most recent events without weighing the climate in which these actions were influenced and, in some ways, nurtured.
Click here to read the article, The Politics of Assassination: Inside the Violent Movement That Spawned James von Brunn and Scott Roeder, written by Joe Conason. Department of Homeland Security's Report on Right Wing Extremism Also at NowPublic : The Politics of Fear
Crowd Power
-
Karen Hatter
All Locations, Everywhere, United States
Recommendations (54)
-
Nauman Umair Khan
Pakistan -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
jordan
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
-
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
senthil5000
st Louis, United States -
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines -
Pythiian1
New York, New York, United States -
politisite
Columbia, South Carolina, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 09:24 on June 15th, 2009
Even worse when the US military is willing to actively train said extremists.
at 11:03 on June 15th, 2009
I could not agree more Jordan. The fact that there is a war in Afghanistan and that the US Military is stretched, is hardly a reason to do this. I don't know how they could justify that and flies in the face of the fact that they want to maintain the Don't Ask Don't tell policy.
at 11:07 on June 15th, 2009
I agree with Leonard Zeskind's premise that these acts of extremism should not be taken lightly. We must, however, also note that these are isolated acts. Organizations that tend to attract these type of people need to become more vigilant and ensure that any violent tendencies are reported to authorities. Known extremist groups should already be on a Homeland Security watchlist.
at 14:29 on June 15th, 2009
America believes in the Rule of Law, while the scales of justice are not always blind, folks should not take the law into their own hands and decide who lives or dies. What bugged me the most about Mr. Johns death, was that he was opening the door to allow Von Brunn, who appeared disabled, easy access to the Holocaust museum. He dies for being Kind and considerate. Now his family is lacking one of it's important parts because of hate. In Tillers case, Killing the man in church is a cowardly act.
I think the DHS should target real extremists like these two and leave the left and right alone. Calling teaparty goes extremist and some environmentalists extremists are a bit much... each group loves America. The best place to look is to those who think the constitution is null and void.
Thanks Karen for this story
at 15:04 on June 15th, 2009
My thanks to Everyone for your recommendations and your comments.
I was thinking the same thing about Mr. Johns, Al, almost watching him head for the door to help an elderly man. Maybe if, as the guard approached the door, if the rifle was at his side, the barrel looked like the end of a cane, at a glance.
It has been reported von Brunn is considered a bit of an elder statesman in White nationalist/supremacist circles and has been on the radar for years.
In the case of most individuals, unless they provide clues otherwise, no one will know what they plan to do.
Many extremists who do these things claim they love their country as well, proclaiming their love is the reason they do what they do.
There in lies the argument regarding the cultivation of attitudes of intolerance, minimally, being a contributory factor.
at 21:40 on June 15th, 2009
The real root is childhood rearing. It always starts with pain in the womb and then lack of love in the home..then school with bullies.. One can connect the dots here the most. Environment does contribute but it has to be toward a being already a victim without love. It ends up becoming a bully or projecting hate on specific ideologies and/or people. People without love then are drawn to this dna group.
I would like to refer to anyone interested in the root of this kind of evil to read Alice Miller's
books which are on the Parent Recommeded read list in St Louis schools.
Miller blames abusive parents for the majority of neuroses and psychoses of mankind. In all cultures "sparing the parents is our supreme law" wrote Miller. Even psychiatrists, psychoanalysts and clinical psychologists are unconsciously afraid to blame parents for the mental disorders of their clients. According to Miller mental health professionals are also creatures of the poisonous pedagogy internalized in their own childhood. This explains why the command "Honor your parents" has been one of the main targets in Miller's school of psychology.[13]
Miller calls electroconvulsive therapy "a campaign against the act of remembering". She also criticizes psychotherapists' advice to clients to forgive their abusive parents. For Miller this can only hinder the way to recovery: to remember and feel the pain of our childhood. "The majority of therapists fear this truth. They work under the influence of destructive interpretations culled from both Western and Oriental religions, which preach forgiveness to the once-mistreated child". Forgiveness does not resolve hatred but covers it in a very dangerous way in the outgrown adult: displacement on scapegoats, as she discussed in her psycho-biographies of Adolf Hitler and Jürgen Bartsch, both of whom she describes as having suffered atrocious parental abuse.[14]
A common denominator in Miller's writings is to explain why human beings prefer not to know about their own victimization during childhood: to avoid unbearable pain. However, the unconscious command of the individual, not to be aware how he or she was treated in childhood, leads to displacement: the irresistible drive to repeat traumatogenic modes of parenting in the next generation of children.[15]
Writings
The following is a brief summary of Alice Miller's books.
The Drama of the Gifted Child (Das Drama des begabten Kindes, 1979)
In her first book (also published under the titles Prisoners of Childhood and The Drama of Being a Child) Miller defines and elaborates the personality manifestations of childhood trauma. She seeks the truth about her own childhood experiences and in so doing defines the model that has become widely accepted in psychotherapeutic circles, such as the Tavistock Institute. She addresses the two reactions to the loss of love in childhood, depression and grandiosity; the inner prison, the vicious circle of contempt, repressed memories, the etiology of depression, and how childhood trauma manifests itself in the adult.
For Your Own Good (Am Anfang war Erziehung, 1980)
Miller proposes here that German traumatogenic methods of childrearing produced Hitler and a serial killer of children named Jürgen Bartsch. Children learn to take their parent's point of view against themselves "for their own good". In the case of Hitler, he learned to take his parents' point of view against himself, against Jews, and against other groups of people. For Miller, the traditional pedagogic process is manipulative, resulting in grown-up adults deferring excessively to authorities, even to tyrannical leaders or dictators like Hitler. Miller even argues for abandoning the term "pedagogy" in favor of the word "support," something akin to what psychohistorians call the helping mode of parenting.
The key element that Miller elucidates in this book is the understanding of why the German nation, the "good Germans," complied with Hitler's abusive regime, which Miller asserts was a direct result of how the society in general treated its children. She raised fundamental questions about current, worldwide child-rearing practices and issued a stern warning.
Miller has communicated with leading education, psychology, and medical health establishments, as well as political leaders in many countries, to no avail.
Thou Shalt Not Be Aware (Du sollst nicht merken, 1981)
Unlike Miller's later books, this one is written in an academic style. It is her first critique of psychoanalysis, charging it with being similar to the poisonous pedagogies that she described in For Your Own Good. Miller is critical of both Freud and Jung. She scrutinizes Freud's drive theory, a device that blames the child for the abusive sexual behavior of adults. Miller also theorizes about Franz Kafka, who was abused by his father but fulfilled the politically-correct function of mirroring abuse in metaphorical novels, instead of exposing it.
The Untouched Key (Der gemiedene Schlüssel, 1988)
This book is partly a psychobiography of Nietzsche, Picasso, Kollwitz and Buster Keaton; (in Miller's latest book, The Body Never Lies published in 2005, she includes similar analyses of Dostoyevsky, Chekhov, Schiller, Rimbaud, Mishima, Proust, and James Joyce).
According to Miller, Nietzsche did not experience a loving family and his philosophical output is a metaphor of an unconscious drive against his family's oppressive theological tradition. She believes the philosophical system is flawed because Nietzsche was unable to make emotional contact with the abused child inside him. Though Nietzsche was severely punished by a father who lost his mind when Nietzsche was a little boy, Miller does not accept the genetic theory of madness. She interprets Nietzsche's psychotic breakdown as the result of a family tradition of Prussian modes of child-rearing.
[] Banished Knowledge (Das verbannte Wissen, 1988)
In this more personal book Miller confesses she herself was abused as a child. She also introduces the fundamental concept of "enlightened witness": a person who is willing to support a harmed individual, empathize with her and help her to gain understanding of her own biographical past.
Banished Knowledge is autobiographical in another sense. It is a pointer in Miller's thorough-going apostasy from her own profession, psychoanalysis. She believes society colludes with Freud's theories in order not to know the truth about our childhood, a truth that human cultures have "banished." She concludes that the feelings of guilt instilled in our minds since our most tender years reinforce our repression even in the psychoanalytic profession.
[edit] Breaking Down the Wall of Silence (Abbruch der Schweigemauer, 1990)
Written in the aftermath of the fall of the Berlin Wall, Miller takes to task the entirety of human culture. What she calls the "wall of silence" is the metaphorical wall behind which society — academia, psychiatrists, clergy, politicians and members of the media — has sought to protect itself: denying the mind-destroying effects of child abuse. She also continues the autobiographical confession initiated in Banished Knowledge about her abusive mother. In Pictures of a Childhood: Sixty-six Watercolors and an Essay Miller says that painting helped her to ponder deeply into her memories. In some of her paintings Miller depicts baby Alice as swaddled, sometimes by an evil mother.[16]