Poor Quality Education in Mexico Urgent Reform Needed

by patgarcia | March 30, 2008 at 06:02 pm
4008 views | 3 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

Maria del Pueblito Avila, a student teacher with a high school diploma

Maria del Pueblito Avila, a student teacher with a high school diploma

see larger image

uploaded by patgarcia

We have a serious problem of ignorance and illiteracy in our country.

Ignorance, self interest and corruption among some  teachers and polititians are damaging the future and potential of generations by keeping the people ignorant and illiterate, doomed to live in extreme poverty if something is not done. It's sad to know about  the amount of children and people who can barely read and write and sometimes.... they can't do it at all.

My gratitute goes to honorable teachers and educators that make a difference sharing their knowledge and wisdom with those that need it so much.

MEXICO CITY — Soaring dropout rates. Pitiful scores in math and science. A proliferation of so-called "trash universities" that offer diplomas but little learning.

By all accounts, Mexico's education system is in serious trouble.

Nearly a decade after former President Vicente Fox vowed to lead an "education revolution," the country has made important strides in ensuring universal access to basic schooling. Today, virtually all children attend elementary school and three of every four attend middle and junior high school, up from six of 10 in 2000.

But the poor quality of that education has thwarted efforts to modernize the economy, trapping the country in a cycle of poverty and low-skilled labor. That pattern has fueled the wave of illegal immigration to the United States.

More than half of Mexico's 15-year-old students don't have basic math and science skills, according to the Paris-based Program for International Student Assessment, which tests education systems throughout the world. Four in ten high school students drop out. And thousands of rural children study in primitive conditions.

Many, like residents of the dust-choked village of El Rialengo, 150 miles north of the capital, rely on volunteer teachers with little training.

On a scorching afternoon, nine children ages 6 to 11 jammed into a crumbling, one-room schoolhouse in El Rialengo. The building, built by residents, lacked electricity and plumbing. While scrawny goats roamed outside, the pupils clamored for the attention of the sole teacher.

"She's not a real teacher," said farmer Javier Garcia, referring to the timid, 21-year-old trainee assigned to the village. "Just because we're poor doesn't mean we don't deserve better."

Miracle

"An accomplishment or occurrence so outstanding or unusual as to seem beyond human capability or endeavor; a wonderful thing worthy of admiration."

--Webster's Third New International Dictonary of the English Language. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Inc., 2002.

"An extremely outstanding or unusual event, thing, or accomplishment" --Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam Company, 1977.

Miracles are exciting

You sing some nice children's songs in kindergarten, and that s it," piano teacher Beatriz Ibarra de Munoz points out to me, suggesting that the kind of music education so many middle-to upper-class Americans take for granted, does not exist in the public schools in Mexico.

Munoz and her colleagues are part of the growing group of women whohave undertaken a project in which the long-term goal is nothing lessthan the restructuring of Mexican life and the elimination of povertythrough education, culture and health care. During my visit to Mexico,I had the privilege of teaching piano at the Imagina School in Leon,witnessing a miracle in one of Mexico's worst ghettos.

The road from the airport to Leon is a hustling-bustling,well-traveled highway, crowded with trucks spewing dust everywhere.Leon, a city of several million people, is a two-hour drive from MexicoCity in the state of Guanajuato. (1) Nestled against a steep hill onthe outskirts of this busy metropolis, approximately 30 miles from theexact geographic center of Mexico, is the neighborhood of El CastilloAzul, the blue castle, an unlikely name for one of Leon's poorest areasand the home of about 17,000 people.There is one paved road in El Castillo Azul and it is only five yearsold. Here, there are homes without electricity, running water ortoilets. The average income is $4 a day, the average public schoolstudent drops out by the third grade, and the typical home is one roomwith one mattress for six or more children.

Today, Mexico has nearly reached its goal of providing facilities for allschool-age children. 

Yet, despite historical advancements and heroic efforts by educators,Mexico continues to struggle with "rezago," or educational failure. Millionsof students are retained or drop out after primary school and secondaryschool. Rural communities--especially those of Indigenous people wheremillions of citizens speak Spanish as a second language--have high ratesof poverty. In these settings, many children drop out of school to workand support their families, which contributes to a higher rate of illiteracy.

There can be a vast difference between the educational experiences ofurban and rural children. Even as the population of Mexico becomes moreurban, the number of small communities increases. These communities areisolated and economically poor, and they have many daunting educationalproblems: the difficulty of finding teachers willing to travel long distancesto teach there, students' inability to attend school due to impassableroads or family responsibilities, and the need for children to work. Ruralstudents may have to leave their communities after elementary school toattend school in a nearby town, and some families cannot afford to payfor travel, textbooks, uniforms, and other school costs after sixth grade.The same is true of poor urban students, although they have more schoolchoices where they live.

On May 30, 2007, Ambassador Garza visited four Huichol communities in the sierra of Jalisco. There he was able to witness firsthand some of the positive results of the Training, Internships, Exchanges and Scholarships (TIES) program. Amb. Garza is greeted by grade school students

The students of the grade school in the township of San Miguel Huaixtita warmly welcomed Amb. Garza. "Education is key for the development of these Huichol communities, and we are proud to continue providing support to teachers and students who deserve a brighter future," said Amb. Garza.

source: http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.usembassy-mexico.gov/Ambassador/huicholes_arrival.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.usembassy-mexico.gov/eng/Ambassador/eAF070530Huichol.html&h=263&w=350&sz=27&hl=en&start=6&sig2=agUBTkpWc9K_uTfo8WMwEA&um=1&tbnid=uH_TlHwUR5JRbM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=120&ei=tj7wR63mI5OYgAOTybHACw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Drural%2Bschools%2Bin%2B%2Bmexico%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26lr%3Dlang_en%257Clang_fr%257Clang_es%26safe%3Dactive%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Rob Peters
Rob Peters
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:40 on March 31st, 2008

Thanks for bringing attention to this important issue.

0
meli

i'm from mexico and i really want to this situation stop i don't like see children working or suffering. Thaks for bring all this imformation i hope it help to make consciences in more people

0
John Jensen

Schools in Mexico share a common problem with US schools,  where I've been a consultant since 1971.  They don't think in terms of using the obvious. A million pieces of archived research should by now show the difference between good and poor education. If we sent rockets into space the way we run schools, we'd have a lot of fried astronauts and a shuttered program. There, we operate unbelievably complex systems successfully, inventing as we go, by using cause and effect: Reason back from results, don't blame your tools, and learn from what you did. 

The problem is that educators top down still wear the colored glasses of Progressive Education that dismissed the necessity of learning an academic body of knowledge. Instead we get people through gates—a few assignments, cramming, and testing means they've done enough to proceed—a style of instruction leaving huge gaps in outcomes.

And why?  Back to the colored glasses: As a consultant I’ve often presented ideas to school administrators who told me, “That’s a great idea. I wish you well with it.” Their main priority was not to implement effective ideas but rather to administer systems they felt powerless to alter--leaving the rest of us to grope about the edges rather than subject the inner workings of their system to rational modification. Some aspects of the system, however, remain painfully irrational:

1. Change is presumed to take years, yet students change themselves by going from one room to another—from a poor teacher to a good one.  They change in minutes. Ask any teacher: You do something that doesn't work, you change it, and in a day, your students respond better.  Changes in outcomes happen as soon as conditions change.

What would a rocket engineer do with that?  First, he'd regard it as important. If changes could happen in minutes instead of years, it could alter everything. So he’d 1) find out if it‘s true, 2) discover the conditions needed, and 3) apply the changes everywhere (Mars voyagers or Hubble repairs). If it matters to you to get the best results, then you find out what gets the best results and use it right away. In schools, if that even might be true, then 1) we find out, 2) verify the conditions, and 3) apply them everywhere. We drop the long time frames and billions for yet more experiments, and make changes without being forced to. 

            2. Right now, too many school rooms violate principles of learning. John Medina, in his book Brain Rules, explains (among other fine suggestions) that to be able to remember something, you record it in your mind clearly and then recall it at increasing time intervals—a fact known for decades. First you choose not to forget it, encode it thoroughly, and return to it repeatedly instead of allowing it to dissipate. This “return to refresh” knowledge is how we practice it, like what builds skill in all fields. The mind generates a field of learning by repeated practice in explaining it (teachers say "To learn a subject, teach it”). There is really no alternative. You re-explain learning (in writing, or verbally presenting or discussing it) or you lose it. In all skills, “practice makes perfect.”

            3. Extremely few schools even invite students to build a body of mastered knowledge (though theywish students would), and do not offer them means of doing so. Schools annually turn out millions of mediocre students (besides those who drop out). Their finals, credits, and courses on their transcript tell students that they never need to think about those subjects again. The system drives students to discard their knowledge.

            Unless we change that, other efforts can only be patches on a leaky vessel. Teachers hourly need to use methods that obtain permanent knowledge. Stressing people who fail under the existing system or rewarding those who succeed in it won't work. The premise of the system needs to change: Just remove the intrinsic glitch. Teach for how students actually assimilate permanent knowledge.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rob Peters
First Flagged at 2:40 PM, Mar 31, 2008 by Rob Peters
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (3)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from