NP Rank:
The President Is Christian By Choice — Muslim By Media
When President Obama answered the question, "why are you a Christian, asked of him during a backyard gathering, at a home in Albuquerque, N.M.on Tuesday, September 28, 2010; of 7,620,000 Google indications of the story, more than half, 3,970,000, referred to a poll in which 18 percent of the people polled believe that Obama is Muslim.
As if including what others think his religion is, isn't prejudicing enough , 434,000 of the articles included the following paragraph:
- "Obama is the son of a Muslim father from Kenya. His mother was from Kansas. As a boy, he lived for several years in predominantly Muslim Indonesia with his mother and Indonesian stepfather. Some think his full name, Barack Hussein Obama, sounds Muslim."
Appealing to the simplistic reasoning of the "looks like a duck, acts like a duck, sounds like a duck," ilk. Namely, if his father's a Muslim, his stepfather's a Muslim, he lived in a Muslim country, and he's got a Muslim name, he must be a Muslim . . .
By contrast, even though 75% of Americans do not have strong trust in media; and nearly 2/3 of Americans, 63%, believe that news stories are often inaccurate, media doesn't include these statistics when reporting media activities and achievements.
They don't do it to themselves because that's not how they want to be defined, but they do it to this President because major media is resolved to prevent him from defining himself through his words and deeds, and they are accomplishing it by perpetually casting him in racial camouflage, created by "trigger language," which is "spoken" by antics, gestures, stereotypes, images, omissions, admissions, confusion, misstatements, rumors, wrong ideas and inappropriate behavior, all of which are designed to trigger unconscious beliefs, that devalue, sabotage and undermine the target-subject.
In this case, trigger language is used by the press to inspire suspicion about Barack Obama's spiritual beliefs, and his beliefs in general. Which is not unlike Newt Gingrich's use of trigger language to promote fear regarding Obama's racial loyalty.
Newt described Obama as having "Kenyan, anti-colonial" views, which triggers the idea that Obama has black "Kenyan," anti-white "anti-colonial," views. The ridiculousness of the statement is what drives its true meaning.
Since it is impossible for a person who has grown up in America, and who only visited Kenya twice, as a fully developed adult, to have a Kenyan anything, consequently, Kenyan, in this context, must mean something other than the obvious. Also, practically everyone is anti-colonial, and it's thought to be a good thing. Yet, it clearly has negative implications in how it is applied to President Obama. Again, raising the specter of a meaning that is not what is said. The words, the rhythm, the association and the context drive the meaning. The result, racially inspired discomfort, respecting the President.
Another use of trigger language as admission and omission, is the reporting of the BP oil spill. When it was a crisis, Barack Obama's name was all over it, but when the problem got solved, his name was not mentioned.
So the president was asked why he is a Christian, and most of the media hid his answer in discussions about what his religion is thought to be, and where his father was born, and the religion of his stepfather, when the Nation could have been blessed by his eloquently answer:
"(T)he precepts of Jesus Christ spoke to me in terms of the kind of life that I would want to lead — being my brothers' and sisters' keeper, treating others as (I would want them to) treat me,"
"And I think also understanding that Jesus Christ dying for my sins spoke to the humility we all have to have as human beings, that we're sinful and we're flawed and we make mistakes, and that we achieve salvation through the grace of God, but what we can do, as flawed as we are, is still see God in other people, and do our best to help them find their own grace."
"That's what I strive to do. That's what I pray to do every day. I think my public service is part of that effort to express my Christian faith."
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Caoimhin1
Dunshaggin, Ireland
Recommendations (11)
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Caoimhin1
Dunshaggin, Ireland -
TipuSultan
Rawalpindi,Pakistan, Punjab, Pakistan -
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States 
Anonymous users (3)



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 06:54 on September 29th, 2010
So what if he is Muslim?,Muslim blood runs in his body and can u change it??
at 20:50 on September 29th, 2010
there is no such thing as 'muslim blood'.
Islam is a belief system, it is not passed on through genes.
at 08:47 on September 29th, 2010
This is along the lines of separating people by birth, be it religion (jew, muslim, christian or ...) by race (one drop of black blood made a man a slave) or class (Dalits in India) and it's disgusting. Whether we're deciding red heads in britain are inferior (viking heritage inferior?) or that the darker your skin, the dirtier and more coarse you must be, it's all disgusting and furthermore, none of our business. In societies that purport freedom of religion and separation of church and state, a man's faith or that of his forbears is nobody's business but his own.
The trouble here is the lingering wounds of sore losers festering onward. I dearly wish the American Right would stop pandering to these insane extremists. It makes the whole movement look stupid and ill-educated, narrow minded and bigoted.
at 07:49 on September 30th, 2010
Whether Obama is a Muslim or Christian doesn't change the fact that unless he pulls a rabbit out of his hat, he'll go down in history as one of the worst and most divisive presidents that this country has ever known. Obama makes Jimmy Carter look like a political genius. There are many Americans that have a hard time believing that any one elected to the presidency can be as incompetent as Obama is. As a result, many Americans actually believe that Obama is deliberately doing everything that he can to destroy America. That's the level of cynicism that Obama has instilled into the American voter. Whether or not Obama has good ideas is meaningless if he can't put those ideas into motion and if he's lost the confidence of the American people. American voters are more cynical nowadays than they've ever been, and with good reason: Virtually everything that they want to know about a politician is available to them at their fingertips via the internet. And what they've been discovering lately is that the average politician is the scum of the earth and couldn't care any less about the nation. Indeed most of those that occupy the House, Senate, and White House, are AINO (Americans in name only).
at 17:01 on October 1st, 2010
How can history call a president who got the people the health care that six presidents before him tried and failed to get, worse than them?
How can history call a president who intercepted three terrorist attempts worse than the president who presided over 911?
How can history call a president who brought most nations to more cooperation with, and esteem for, America, worse than the presidents who didn't?
How can history call a president who came into office with America loosing 700,000 jobs a month, and stopped the bleeding and restored job growth, worse than the president who presided over those losses?
Not to mention the the protection against exploitation from banks, and insurance companies, that he's presided over, bringing the auto company's back from the brinks of disaster, and providing more access to money, and insurance protection for college students, while giving a tax cut to everyone except those earning more than $250,000, and that's not all that he's done . . .
As for divisive, there is a new era that has come into being with his presidency, and that is, the division between those who want the American dream to remain a white privilege, and those who want every American to have an equal opportunity to share in the American Dream . . .