NP Rank:
The President Elect, Incidentally, of African American Descent
He attempted to run a flawless campaign. His political attacks against the other candidate took the usual, most accepted, form of attack, on policies and issues, with both campaigns presenting their version of their opponent's record.
The Obama-Biden campaign never called up any derision or doubt related to Senator John McCain's personal life, his service to his country or his family. Neither was his running mate, Governor Sarah Palin, subjected to that type of treatment by the official campaign.
Toward the end of the election cycle, several months before November 4, 2008, the McCain-Palin campaign began to use a strategy, which by its nature, was designed to create a persona for then Senator Barack Obama that misrepresented his religion, his affiliations, his moral character and his motivations.
The campaign never directly used race against President Elect Obama but they did surround him with a shroud of clouded innuendo and mystery, stating for months that no one knew who Senator Obama was, although he'd been campaigning for almost two years, had authored two books featured on the New York Times Best Sellers List and was traveling all over the country during the campaign, introducing himself to the public.
The more Senator Obama traveled and spoke, the more his opponents claimed Americans didn't know him.
The McCain-Palin campaign for President and Vice President of the United States of America culminated with a number of members of the Republican Party, official Party websites and Party surrogates engaging in forms of repugnant, fear based tactics, meant to demonize Senator Obama.
For some unexplained reason, as the weeks progressed, this behavior increased, even though Senator McCain indicated he would not condone that type of behavior, as Governor Palin took the stage week after week, continuing her now standard monologue, detailing that, in her opinion, Senator Obama did not see the same America as she, and those gathered at the rallies, saw America, telling the assembled crowds of thousands Senator Obama had been “palling around with terrorists”.
Congressman John Lewis, a stalwart veteran of the Civil Rights Era of the 50s and 60s, recognizing the behavior exhibited by the crowds gathered at the McCain-Palin campaign events, where comments of a violent nature had been yelled from the crowd, spoke out against such behavior, earning him criticism for drawing a parallel to the behavior he witnessed at the McCain-Palin rallies, comparing it to the behavior of those who gathered to hear the late Governor George Wallace, during the 50s and 60s, as Governor Wallace fought the realization of African American's civil rights, at a time in America when those citizens were denied full participation in American society.
Now, the 2008 Presidential campaign is over. The new President Elect of the United States of America is Barack Obama and there appears to be discontent among some within the land.
Minorities are not responsible for this discontent because they played the 'Race Card', mentioning the color of President Elect Obama, as if no one wouldn't have noticed the most obvious, visual aspect of the man, his appearance.
Contrary to the land in which some Americans prefer to pretend they live, for some when race is concerned, the discontent stems from events I have discussed in my articles and in comment threads throughout the site here at NowPublic.
America has always been and continues to be a work in progress. As pointed out earlier by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the United States was born with a “ .... birth defect”.
Dr. Rice was referring to the institution of chattel slavery, which existed on the continent of North America for over 400 years and was in place as the founders of this nation gathered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1776, proclaiming their right to freedom from tyranny from Great Britain, affixing their names to the Declaration of Independence.
This “defect” resulted in a wound on the American psyche that has never healed.
During the Battle Between the States, more commonly known as the Civil War, those states that seceded from the Union to form the Confederate States of America (CSA) were Texas, Louisiana, Missouri, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida, constituting almost half of the nation at that point in time.
It was a consensus that all the seceding states saw the need for the continuation of slavery, with the CS of A even issuing monetary notes, with idyllic scenes of slavery printed on its face.
Although the American citizens that held enslaved persons represented around 5% of the total population, there were many who aspired to own slaves if the opportunity to do so presented itself.
At the end of the so called Civil War, which has been truthfully described as a war that pitted brother against brother, many grudges and wounds were ignored when the Confederate States were re-absorbed into the fold.
The United States' President who came to be known as the Great Emancipator, Abraham Lincoln, wrote in 1862:
If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union.
This statement by Mr. Lincoln seems to belie ambivalence in his decision or, in my judgment, lacking a fully committed position against the enslavement of approximately 4 million persons of African descent, held in captivity in the United States at that period in time.
The re-forming/re-integration of the Confederacy did not dispel or dissuade the beliefs, ideas or ideals of those who formerly and literally fought to maintain the level of existence they sought to preserve for the future course of America but, now found themselves resigned to concede on many levels.
Nor were any of the Confederacy gleefully accepting being dispossessed of what they viewed as theirs, that being their lands and livestock property, included among those livestock, enslaved humans, now to be accorded the unbelievable status of personhood.
The beliefs and ideas espoused by the Confederacy were not only beliefs held by those in the Southern, seceding states. Many Northerners also harbored their own misgivings and prejudices toward the descendants of those brought from Africa and enslaved in America.
With the passage of time, after the Civil War, most U.S. citizens settled into a life that held, as a given, the second class citizenship status of the formerly enslaved, with the list of incongruities, indignities and miseries suffered by those formerly enslaved, well known by most reading this.
Each generation since that time has brought forth men and women from among all races that dedicated themselves to righting the wrongs they perceived in their country. Each victory came as the result of many hard fought battles, with many casualties, both physical as well as mental.
Today, the country continues it's forward progression into a new reality and as in the past, most citizens will adjust to the progression of their government.
Also, as occurred in the past, some did not then and may not now adjust, with most of these engaged in self imposed silence, only revealing their true feelings, when finding themselves in the 'right' company, that is, with those whom they share(d) the same mindset. How many of these citizens harbor thoughts and ideas they may transform into anti-social or violent actions, is unknown.
Whichever U.S. citizens disagree with the selection by the majority of the U.S. electorate that selected President Elect Barack Obama, that is their right but their right does not allow a perception that they can terrorize others because of their displeasure with the presidential election.
Since the nation has chosen as its President a man from within the Democratic Party, a man who happens to be of African and American descent, those who find themselves in defiance of this outcome, for whatever reason, must be held accountable for any and all actions acted upon and motivated by racial intolerance, meant to intimidate, deprive or harm anyone that has been targeted as a victim of intolerance.
As each racially tinged incident that has occurred across this nation, since the general election in the United States, November 4, 2008, is investigated, when it is found prosecution is warranted, prosecution must occur to reinforce a reality that neither individual states of the United States nor the nation as a whole will tolerate any further descent into chaos based upon racial hatred.
The custom or plan of action when those types of individuals and their deeds should, would or could be ignored cannot re-instituted.
Also at NowPublic:
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
cassy82
Los Angeles, California, United States Minor Outlying Islands
Recommendations (79)
-
Pythiian1
New York, New York, United States -
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
Barbara McPherson
Nanaimo, Canada -
dunkelberg
United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
-
politisite
Columbia, South Carolina, United States -
dowdinsk
Dalston, London, United Kingdom -
Sputnic
London, United Kingdom -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (14)
at 11:50 on November 19th, 2008
Well put.
It did strike me as so duplicitous that the unknown Palin was saying Obama was an "unknown" (in the end, what hurt her was we found out too much about who she is).
Carla Bruni (sigh) visited with a tongue-tied David Letterman last night and said how she is overjoyed at Obama's election. However, as EurObama feelings swelled, I wondered if he could get elected over there.
Finally, it is an interesting quirk of history that Lincoln, the "great emancipator", may not have moved against slavery had the South been willing to deal.
at 10:33 on November 19th, 2008
I fear this is something that will never really go away - we have come a long way, but not nearly far enough in terms of accepting difference.
Good piece.
at 14:14 on November 19th, 2008
As someone who grew up in South Carolina and who still lives here, and a one who successfully fought pressures to joing the "right company," I have seen these bad boys in action and will tell you right now that they are slippery, stealthy and cowardly -- all virtues for a racist activist. They are hard to catch, but must be caught for the reasons you expressed.
At the same time, remember the warnings of Malcolm X, who said he'd rather deal with a Southern racist that a more genteel one from the North. At least you know what you're dealing with when you come across the former variety. The bastards from where you least expect them are some real pieces of work.
at 16:58 on November 19th, 2008
Karen, a great post, thank you, zichi!
at 19:01 on November 19th, 2008
Great and thoughtful post.
at 19:19 on November 19th, 2008
My thanks to all for stopping by to read, for the Recommends and your comments!
at 19:25 on November 19th, 2008
A wise point to be considered, Denseatoms, one often repeated by many African Americans after making their transition from the South, north of the Mason-Dixon line!
at 19:36 on November 19th, 2008
A good read, Karen. Thanks!
at 15:46 on November 24th, 2008
Good story. While I respect Congressman Lewis, I have seen his use of Race Baiting in Georgia Politics. Here is a transcript of a commercial
Source: totheright.org
John sees racism in everything and is not afraid to use race as a fear tactic to get blacks not to vote for a candidate. In this case it was a city of Atlanta Councilman. Obama came out with a statement regarding the Lewis remarks,
Source: ajc.com
I think folks chose not to know the Man Barack Obama. He made his beliefs and agendas clear in his books. Republicans were being called over the top when calling him a socialist. If one really read his books one could clearly see that he chose his friends carefully and some of them were socialists, Marxist etc. His own words were clear. He wrote the words, the GOP only repeated it. Reporters showed their ignorance by calling Republicans out on the statements that were stated almost verbatim from Obama's own works.
Folks will have the next 4 years to evaluate if he is a man of change or more of the same. So far his cabinet picks look like a Clinton Rally. Incidentally he is also of Anglo-Saxon descent.
All in all a good piece.
at 16:11 on November 24th, 2008
I listened to Radio Sweden and Radio Netherlands both were going through the streets asking what they thought about an Obama Presidency. Everyone said they were pleased... Not one person said they were not happy. Either the reporters are biased or Obama is a total rock star in the world. Then the question, "will we have a minority president". Maybe 20-30 years was the answers. It is interesting that these progressive Europeans, who badger America at every turn, can't see themseleves electiing a minority for another 20 or 30 years.
Lincoln was against slavery from childhood based on every account one could find. This who idea that he would have let things go if he could get a deal is a bit much. I have heard that he made some military descisions that included blacks in the military to increase fighting streanth... As Lincoln goes.. he used this as an excuse to emanicipate rather then a means to win the war. Lincoln was cunning and baffled his opponents even as a child he used trickery. I don't buy the twist to make the Great Republican nothing more then a contemporary political actor. His choice to free the slaves cost him his life.
at 22:13 on November 24th, 2008
The words attributed to Abraham Lincoln are his own and provide his thoughts on the enslavement of those of African descent quite plainly.
The use of those formerly enslaved by the Union Army during the Civil War deprived the Confederacy of their use, as well as increasing the strength of the Union Army. Lincoln initially supported returning the enslaved escaping from the South to their presumed owners during the war.
As the monetary fortunes of the South were set to and were overtaking the North, due to the use of millions of unpaid descendants of Africa, it was more than necessary to abort the continued accumulation of wealth being acquired by the South through its use of slavery.
Although stating his opposition slavery, Lincoln's views on the inherent inferiority of Black people versus White people and his push for the resettlement of the descendants of Africa outside of the United States is well known.
From Lincoln's Presidential Inaugural Address in March 1861:
Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States, that by the accession of a Republican Administration, their property, and their peace, and personal security, are to be endangered. There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension. Indeed, the most ample evidence to the contrary has all the while existed, and been open to their inspection. It is found in nearly all the published speeches of him who now addresses you. I do but quote from one of those speeches when I declare that "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." Those who nominated and elected me did so with full knowledge that I had made this, and many similar declarations, and had never recanted them. And more than this, they placed in the platform, for my acceptance, and as a law to themselves, and to me, the clear and emphatic resolution which I now read:
"Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to that balance of power on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depend; and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any State or Territory, no matter under what pretext, as among the gravest of crimes."
I now reiterate these sentiments: and in doing so, I only press upon the public attention the most conclusive evidence of which the case is susceptible, that the property, peace and security of no section are to be in anywise endangered by the now incoming Administration. I add too, that all the protection which, consistently with the Constitution and the laws, can be given, will be cheerfully given to all the States when lawfully demanded, for whatever cause -- as cheerfully to one section, as to another.
There is much controversy about the delivering up of fugitives from service or labor. The clause I now read is as plainly written in the Constitution as any other of its provisions:
"No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due."
Upon realization the Union was losing, as Lincoln continued to try to straddle the fence on the question of slavery, he was forced to take a stand, issuing the Emanicipation Proclamation, which only declared free those enslaved that found themselves in states and territories in defiance of the Union, while leaving the " .... excepted parts, are for the present, left precisely as if this proclamation were not issued."
Lincoln's shrewdness and ".... trickery", as well as his possibility of 'getting a deal', can be considered speculative, with the possible 'deal', given historical statements, seeming to be as likely as any other methodolgy that could be offered for his actions.
at 06:55 on November 25th, 2008
Race baiting is not the issue here.
Congressman John Lewis' remarks regarding some assembled at McCain-Palin rallies and the hateful comments emanating from the crowd were dead on, also commented upon by pundits, many of them White, among them David Gergen, former White House advisor.
The tenor of the crowds gathered had been ugly and reminiscent of the crowds that gathered during the time when the United States was still in the throes of righting the most grievous wrongs perpetrated upon the descendants of Africa by the society as a whole and its citizens in this country.
That President Elect Obama's mother's side is the Anglo Saxon side, was mentioned in my piece, as the American in African American, with all knowing of his bi-continental/interracial heritage.
at 08:07 on November 25th, 2008
Karen, It is impossible to filter crowds such that no one might say something out of line. We would then be crossing another line. Many of the comments reported by the press ended up having no basis in fact. I exhort you to find any audio or video of anyone at a Palin rally yell, "kill him". You cannot hold them responsible for a very few idiots in a crowd. If Palin is responsible for what someone in a crowd said then we must look at associations on Obama's side. I am not sure we need or want to continue pounding away at the Ayers, Wright issue. It seems to me a double standard to attack Palin and McCain for an audience member statement when the left says how ridiculous it is to connect Ayers and Wright to Obama.
How many times have I been at a McCain Rally and leftist slip in and cause a scene. Calling McCain a war criminal. Will the left concede the actions of their party members?
If everyone is knowing of Obams racial make-up, why the emphasis in the title? Can we all get over the race issue and just be proud that a person of color has risen to the highest office in the land. So Far, He seems to be making some good choices for his cabinet.
Like I said, I don't want to press to hard on an American hero, Congressman Lewis, but he has exaggerated race in the past. At the same time, I can underrstand, based on Con. Lewis experience with white America in the 60's to harbor racial glasses but when I heard that commercial in Atlanta (where my brother is a Commissioner) I was shocked as this man he referred to had no background of any racial hatred or ill chatter.
If we are to get beyond the color of ones skin, it might be helpful if both sides quit with the accusations. I won't go one and on on this one as I usually concede in the end that I would rather keep a good relationship then go into a rhetorical back and forth.
You know my history, I have worked for Black politicians. The chairman of one of the most conservative counties in Georgia was black (he was my boss). He won in a country with one of the lowest black populations in our state. Some of us really do believe in content of Character rather then color of ones skin.
Karen, I just hope, before I pass from this earth, that communities around the country will be like my community, like my church, and like my friends, Diverse and equal
at 09:12 on November 25th, 2008
As I said, Al, this was not about race baiting.
The highly agitated crowds that began showing up at McCain-Palin rallies, numbering in the thousands, in some cases, shouting violent actions, could be compared, in tone and behavior to another time, where that time period happened to be buoyed by racist overtones yet, each having a sinister element.
As Congressman Lewis said, Governor Wallace did not do the things he mentioned, bomb the church where the four little African American girls died etc. but, his posturing, public and private, contributed to the atmosphere that fed the hate.
The McCain-Palin campaign is/was responsible for calming its crowds, as stated by some Republican strategists as well, one such Republican quoted here, with some of them most certainly finding themselves under the bus.
As far as the title, I thought it clear. It is meant to indicate the article was about the President Elect, who just happens to be of African and American descent.