Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
President Obama Demands Romney's Finacial Records-Where Are His?
Share: 
by Doc Vega | July 16, 2012 at 05:24 pm
365 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments
Videos
In his demands for Mitt Romney’s overseas investment records and tax returns from previous years, President Obama has conveniently overlooked one thing-his own records that have never been publicly disclosed!
As Democrats, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, and Minority Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, enjoy the benefits of outsourcing their funds to such investments as Bank of India or Asian market securities, Mitt Romney is vilified by President Obama for following none other than the same investment strategies as his Democrat colleagues. Is there irony in this revelation or what?
Refusal To Disclose
Let us be reminded of the fact that when Barack Obama was inaugurated into the oval office and took an oath to not only defend the US Constitution, but protect the nation he was elected to govern (the United States of America), he pledged transparency which he claimed the Bush administration had not practiced. Yet, from the very onset those who inquired found that when trying to find answers to the elusive background of Barack Hussein Obama, found academic records locked down, proof of citizenship in dispute, and a generally mysterious lack of corroborating evidence about the President’s past. This was enough to make any American who wasn’t asleep raise their eyebrow and ask why the secrecy?
What did the President have to hide that so many aspects of his life were clouded in a shroud of secrecy? Why, if he had been properly vetted, would a US President have any reservations about releasing perfectly legitimate personal data? Is it not the duty of an American president to reveal all background information? Every other President of the United States has. So what makes Obama so special? What gives President Obama the privilege of hiding the details of his life from the American public unless he has something to worry about? Is that it? Does Barack Hussein Obama have personal information that he thinks the American people would be upset over?
As President Obama self righteously hammers away at Mitt Romney, a self reliant business man who has a very honorable background over exercising the same investment strategies as Democrats seem to find acceptable, I will provide for you a list of, as yet undisclosed, personal information that to date President Obama continues to hide from the American people. Why? Let us examine the list, and it is a considerable one.
1)Passport records
2) Obama kindergarten records
3) Punahou School records
4) Occidental College records
5)Columbia University records
6)Columbia thesis
7) Harvard Law School records
8) Harvard Law Review articles
9) University of Chicago scholarly articles
10) Illinois State Bar Association records
11) Illinois State Senate records/schedules (said to be lost)
12) Medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license
13) Obama/Dunham divorce documents
14) Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
15) Adoption records and the long form Certificate of Live Birth
To call upon Obama to locate and provide such records might seem a bit daunting, but the point is that these records should be available through public agencies. Anyone running for the office of the US Presidency should expect to have to satisfy the protocols of state verification for the public office that he holds. The fact that President Obama has resisted efforts to uncover these records, has paid more than a million dollars to legal firms to quash challenges to his eligibility for the office of the presidency, and the White House submitted long form birth certificate is a proven fraudulent document created in a computer.
At the very least, President Obama is guilty of committing a felony offense for falsifying a federal document. Yet, the American media has blacked out this story, Congress has ignored it, and liberals act though this is a moot argument. Yet it is. It has everything to do with due process of law, the US Constitution, the very heritage of our nation, and the trust of the American people. 30 years ago such lying and this unbecoming behavior of a US President would never have been tolerated. Obama would have been impeached.
Advertisement
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 18:22 on July 16th, 2012
The President didn't ask Romney for financial records, he asked him for several tax filings, which most presidential candidates provide, so that the public and others can observe patterns/trends . . . So far, Romney has provided one year, while President Obama has provided 12 years. President Obama's submissions have only been equaled by Romney's father.
As for the felony issue, if Romney is telling the truth when he says that he did not work for Bain after 1999, then his many filings with the SEC through 2002 are false, and it was pointed out by President Obama's surrogate that a false representation to the SEC is a felony. No one called him a felon, they just pointed out that filing a false representation is a felony. The inference is that Romney either lied to the SEC or he is lying to the public.
at 05:58 on July 17th, 2012
And by the way, they are asking for Romney's financials on overseas investments now while Democrats outsource their investments overseas all the damn time!
at 05:56 on July 17th, 2012
And how many actions by Obama and there is a long list that any normal citizen would have been prosecuted under felony charges for have gone unanswered and unenforced? And yet they are already trying to convict Romney this is BS and proof of press collusion with the President and that we may not even have true free elections anymore.