President Obama Incites Hatred Within American Society

Ever since the first few months of his inauguration as President, Obama has taken every opportunity to create division within America with his own “rush to judgment” whenever a racial question arises. Using the personal tragedies of individuals, the President has actually escalated social unrest instead of quelling it. A responsible leader of the people should make public statements with forethought and good intention, however, this does not seem to be in the President’s agenda.

Since the Henry Louis Gates incident Oct.23, 2009, when Obama called the Cambridge police stupid when an academic mentor of his was arrested outside his home, the President has used race baiting in his comments to the press to incite tension. Even when Gates verbally abused a policeman who was doing his job when it appeared that a burglar was trying to force entry into a home, the President made a premature judgment and criticized an entire police force.

 In the aftermath of the Nidal Hasan shooting at Ft. Hood that killed 13 soldiers and wounded 22 more, Obama urged Americans not to rush to judgment. The resulting FBI investigation of a known Muslim psychiatric Major, who had expressed personal problems over the war in Iraq, and did not want to deploy, was expunged of all references to terrorism. Acting under Obama’s wishes, Attorney General, Eric Holder made sure that the Department of Justice white washed a bloody shooting spree that was conspicuously connected to radical Muslim influence. However, President Obama chose to publicly deny the obvious creating tension between Americans.

The Tea Party, is a political movement, that brought conservative overview back into Capitol Hill and influenced the November second  elections of 2010 to unseat 600 Democrat and liberal held offices across the nation. It was the largest defeat of Democrat leadership in decades. It reflected the publics dissatisfaction with Obama’s economic policies and his assault upon Constitutional principles. Yet, President Obama, unbecoming of any executive branch office holder, called them Tea Baggers. With that statement, Obama revealed his utter contempt for those speaking out on what was important to Americans.

In fact, the President has not only made public his views, but has also been conspicuously silent when issues called for an outspoken response to obvious injustice. It is here too that the President has not only been remiss, but irresponsible in refusing to admonish guilty parties. An example being the Occupy Movement particularly on Wall Street, Oakland, San Diego, and in other major cities where protestors exhibited reprehensible behavior and defecated on police cars, engaged in public sex, used illegal drugs, stole from retail merchants, disrupted pedestrians, littered and even committed rape against women in their own movement, Obama was silent aside from saying that he sympathized with them. In effect President Obama was condoning the disruption of American cities along with the lewd and violent acts of a suspect movement. Interviews indicated a lack of unity among demonstrators and even outright hiring by unions to remain there.

Where as the Tea Party behaved responsibly, complied with all local permits, clearly stated their grievances, asked for no subsidies from the government, and cleaned up after themselves, Obama actually drew a parallel between them and the Occupy Movement saying that he did not see much difference between the two. His refusal to admonish the Occupiers for their degenerate disregard for decency while associating the Tea Party as similar only demonstrated further the President’s insulting attitude toward an important conservative cause.

The Trayvon Martin incident is a classic example of Obama using racial strife to further incite the flames of hatred and resentment in America. This, by the way, is also a commonly used methodology among Communist agitators as they create social unrest in countries whose political leadership they are attempting to topple. As the major news networks used baby pictures to portray a towering, troubled, and aggressive 17 yr. old teen to depict Trayvon Martin as a victim, Obama made another one of his patented public pronouncements. Saying that Trayvon Martin would have looked just like the son he might have had, the President knowingly threw gasoline on the festering flames of racial tension.

As a result of President Obama’s latest gaffe, the New Black Panthers put a bounty on the head of George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watchman, who was reportedly underneath Trayvon Martin being severely beaten according to one witness. Flash riots have broken out in Chicago. Drive by shootings by hoodie clad thugs have occurred. Fueled by official approval, they have used this incident to justify their rampage upon the innocent. Several incidents of child beatings perpetrated by groups of black kids have resulted in arrests all over the country. As a result of the official White House position of conveying approval for retaliation on a crime where there has been no arrest or formal charges yet, unrest has escalated in America. Not only have President Obama’s statements been slyly inflammatory, but he has refused to direct Eric Holder’s DOJ to prosecute the New Black Panthers for soliciting for the price on the head of George Zimmerman, only adding to the lawlessness being condoned by the White House.

By making widely quoted statements on controversial issues before all the facts were in, and using these comments to achieve an intended goal of provoking subterfuge in our society, President Obama reveals his true allegiance. That allegiance is not to the nation he is responsible to guide and protect, as his loyalty seems better fit to our enemies and detractors who want to see America in the grip of social unrest.