NP Rank:
President Obama must not miss two omens presenting themselves
The time is out of joint, O Curs'd Spite!That e'er I was born, to set it right. ~ Hamlet after receiving his sign
Two omens have appeared within President Barack Obama's purview: They are gifts, signs that he still has time to reverse his path, and stake out a victorious one. If he fails to see them, to comprehend and utilize them, the fourth turning will be given to another.
Obama must look at these two signs and heed them:
Palin's false populism must be countered with a true populism.
Scott Brown: Not just a man: A signpost to an alternative route.
For those of us who are members of the Howe and Strauss Forums, and have been reading their books for the past 13 years, there are two very ominous (for Obama when viewed through a fourth turning lens) signs about Brown here and here.
Things are serious indeed: Brown has all the marks of a fourth turning leader, (See "The Fourth Turning in a Nutshell" and also Howe and Strauss, The Fourth Turning: What the Cycles of History tell us about America's Next Rendezvous with Destiny) and if Obama blows it, the stopwatch will stop, go back, and re-align itself with Scott Brown.
It is possible for the script to revise itself, midstream.
Oh, President, take care!
Right now, we taxpayers give big banks billions to subsidize their student loans.Giving big banks money is decidedly unpopular after the TARP bailout, among liberals and conservatives. So you'd think there would be consensus to end the subsidies.Apparently not.
After the House passed President Obama's proposal to end the subsidies, offer students direct government loans and save taxpayers $80 billion, the Senate has the bill in limbo while bank lobbyists swarm the Capitol.
At last weekend's Tea Party conference, Palin deliberately conflated ending the bank subsidies with the bank bailout:
The list of companies and industries that the government is crowding out and bailing out and taking over, it continues to grow. First, it was the banks, mortgage companies, financial institutions, then automakers. Soon, if they had their way, health care, student loans.
Quite the litany of conflation actually. She packed about a bakers dozen of lies into three sentences. But allow me to focus on just one.
Just as Frank Luntz counseled conservatives to kill the Consumer Financial Protection Agency that would rein in the banks by illogically linking it to bailing out the banks, Palin is trying to kill the end of bank subsidies for student loans by illogically equating it with more subsidies for banks.
There's only one way to beat this phony populism: real populism.
It's time to speak out and tell the Senate to pass student loan reform.
Campaign for America's Future has set up a simple online tool so you can do just that.The choice is simple: $80 billion for Sarah Palin's big bank buddies? Or to make college affordable for the middle-class.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States
Recommendations (35)

Anonymous user
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
stejeb
United Kingdom




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 15:43 on February 9th, 2010
"The Campaign for America’s Future is the strategy center for the progressive movement." (that from their website)
Nice unbiased article from the usual suspects - the liberals that think since the gummit prints money, it is free - and since it is free, the gummit can pay for EVERYTHING!
(For those that have been hiding under their beds since last January, the "Progressive" movement is the new code word for "left-wing liberal". But keep it quiet, they don't want anyone to know. Evidently, they found "liberal" too demeaning to use about themselves)
at 15:46 on February 9th, 2010
Well, my post was extremely UNbiased, and very taking the right into consideration. The Campaign for America's Future is a reference; it is not meant to be focused on. It was my own opining that was intended to be the focus.
at 16:25 on February 9th, 2010
And i did not comment on your commentary, just only the "reference", as it seems to be the pivot of the article. If BO is to be a populist, must he then bash Palin? Not even sure Obama would know how to be a populist. That would seem to entail being in tune with the populace, something he seems rather immune to.
While he may be a better speaker than George Bush, he is hardly a WJB, and i have my doubts as to whether he would know a cob from a cow.
at 16:25 on February 9th, 2010
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. That's right, Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
at 16:33 on February 9th, 2010
You growling at the cob, or the cow?
at 16:36 on February 9th, 2010
erm, both, I think!
at 21:06 on February 9th, 2010
Obama is essentially what his name sounds like! O BOMB A! How do you like that?