President Obama's Citizenship Allegations by Disgruntled Losers

No response in my email to the inquiry about the Campaign for Liberty blogger's article, maybe because of the holiday weekend.   I was surprised to see that Lock n Load's article is still online today, frankly. 

While I wish it were true, this story seems to be copy of April 1st article that was circulating and Snopes and others have debunked.

Yes, it is obviously fake.  AP never made that report, and Lock n Load's blog should be taken down.  Campaign for Liberty should be responsible enough to do so immediately.  The "liberty" of free speech should never be used for slander and malicious gossip masquerading as journalism. 

Every online site where I have submitted articles offers the option of submitting "opinion" pieces.  Lock n Load's aim was not to put forth an opinion, but to deliberately mislead those who read his blog.  Therefore, he submitted the lies as being factual and even misrepresented it as being from Associated Press.

Thanks for your comments.

Fact:  BO HAS NOT provided the long form birth certificate

Fact: BO HAS paid law firms thousands to use every legal route to conceal his past and prevent any progress obtaining the long form birth certificate.  The short form provided is easily obtained even for people NOT BORN in Hawaii and therefore proves NOTHING.  .  

You folks who voted for BO so he could be the first black president may wish to ignore these facts but they are there nonetheless.  Before you start calling people liars, find out the FACTS.

Thank you for sharing your opinion at this article, PNeale.

As a matter of fact, I voted for Hillary, not because I felt that President Obama could not do a fine job as president, but because I was concerned that he might not be able to engender substantial support to win the election.  He did, so the matter is closed for me.  I don't believe haggling over the birth certificate is productive.  I assume that those in authority checked the issue thoroughly already, as the protests surrounding the president's birth began long before election day.  Therefore, I believe President Obama is a natural born U.S. citizen.

It is interesting that Lock n Load published a completely false report and even sought to lend it validity by manufacturing a false AP reference.  I am not wrong to call that report false, because it is.  Not only is it false, it is deemed so unimportant that AP and the Obama administration do not seek to find and prosecute the person who published the false report, although Lock n Load may want to consider that such behavior is actionable.  Campaign for Liberty outlined lofty goals in its mission statement, but it may accomplish less than it could with its credibility damaged due to invalid reports going forward on its website.

Notwithstanding my belief that Obama was born in Hawaii, let me give you another fact:  If the president is not a natural born citizen and those persons who had the responsibility and power to certify his citizenship decided to collude and allow a falsehood (which must be what you assert), then there is absolutely nothing that you or others will be able to do about it, anyway, regardless of lawsuits. Court is not what you think. 

Furthermore, I would think that since the president has satisfied the requirements of office sufficiently in the minds of the Electoral College and the Supreme Court, which determined not to hear the matter, it is not up to President Obama to present anything further.  Rather, it should be up to his accusers to produce proof that their claims have merit.  Otherwise, I assume that none of you have more to offer than Lock n Load - conjecture substantiated by lies. 

President Obama ran for office against powerful people with adequate resources to find any hidden facts that would be obstacles to his election.  Consider that if they did not substantiate his ineligibility based on citizenship, there is no reason to believe such claims.  For example, former President George Bush campaigned for Sen. McCain.  Consider the former president's vast surveillance network, which one might safely assume was capable of discovering false birth records.  See yesterday's report by Yahoo News (7/11/09)

TOO FEW OFFICIALS KNEW OF SURVEILLANCE
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090711/ap_on_go_co/us_domestic_surveillance;_ylt=Aq0Bvo2UN9KPQ69h2hu9CvdH2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTM4ZzlzazhuBGFzc2V0Ay9hcC8yMDA5MDcxMS9hcF9vbl9nb19jby91c19kb21lc3RpY19zdXJ2ZWlsbGFuY2UEY3BvcwMyBHBvcwMyBHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcmllcwRzbG

WASHINGTON – Not enough relevant officials were aware of the size and depth of an unprecedented surveillance program started under President George W. Bush, let alone signed off on it, a team of federal inspectors general found.

The Bush White House pulled in a great quantity of information far beyond the warrantless wiretapping previously acknowledged, the IGs reported. They questioned the legal basis for the effort but shielded almost all details on grounds they're still too secret to reveal.

**************************

It is unlikely that Mr. Bush is a secret Democrat, isn't it?  I am curious.  Who did you support in the election?

I found this blog in my effort to verify the referrenced "news" article.  As I could find no link back to AP, I decided that it was probably fake.  Mary Neal argues well on that point.

In the interest of full information, I am a member of C4L.  I have tried on several occasions to get a response from management there.  While they are obviously doing some good work, at least from the perspective of one interested in individual rights, and limited, constitutional, and fiscally responsible government, responding to correspondence is not one of C4L's strong suits.  So do not feel slighted that you did not get an immediate response.  Neiter do I.  In part, this is because C4L is running a tight ship, small bureaucracy in proportion to the quarter million people signed up.

However, I disagree with the author that the issue of Obama's residency is a settled issue.  Why would he spend the hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to keep this concealed if he did not have anything to hide?

For you Obamites, I urge you to pay attention.  Obama has created his own (Hitler?) youth corps, he has shredded the already Bush-shredded constitution, he has taken many actions NOT authorized either by law or the constitution ( the take over of private industry), he has erected a multitude of "czars" that are more or less independent of the checks and balances of a constitutional republic, he seems bent on punishing his enemies and denying them basic rights ( see DHS memos, "Hate Crime" legislation that leaves decisions to his atty. Gen., not a court of law, and more.)  His chief of staff has threatened folks with the wrath of the IRS and the lap dog media (Chrysler bond holders,) and he proposes a national police force as big and as well funded as the military.  For what purpose?   In just a few months time, our Federal Government has come to own or control some 33% of our economy.  Fascism, anyone?

I have been saying for some months, that it is at least a 50-50 proposition that he could turn out to be an American Hitler.  And the odds are getting "better" all the time.