President Tony Blair?

by Dave Keating | February 7, 2008 at 02:54 pm
405 views | 9 Recommendations | 4 comments

Videos

Tony Blair to step down as leader of the Labour Party

see larger video

sourced by Dave Keating

Tony Blair to step down as leader of the Labour Party

Photos

British P.M. Tony Blair Threatens Iran Over Arrested Sailors

British P.M. Tony Blair Threatens Iran Over Arrested Sailors

see larger image

uploaded by opinionist

It looks like discussion around Tony Blair becoming the first “President of Europe” is heating up. According to the BBC, Blair is now discussing the prospect with current British prime minister Gordon Brown. The network is claiming there are forces in the prime minister’s office who are actively encouraging such an idea.


It is thought that Blair and Brown are discussing the pros and cons of such a move, and Brown is waiting for Blair’s green light before he voices his support for the idea, which would signal that Blair is actively campaigning for the job. Blair’s recent activity suggests that he is leaning in that direction. Last month he delivered a speech to Sarkozy’s UMP party conference – in French! Sarkozy has in turn expressed his desire for Blair to take the job.


The position, which is actually the President of the Council of the European Union, was created by the EU reform treaty which is now being voted on my the 27 member states. It replaces the bizarre and unwieldy previous system in which the European presidency was rotated every six months to a different member state, making that state’s leader the ‘president’ for those few months. The new president position would be selected by the Council, which along with the European Parliament is one of the two legislative branches of EU government. The appointee would then need to be approved by all 27 member states. If the treaty is ratified, the new president would start in January 2009. The president would serve a 2 ½ year term.


The exact shape the presidency will take, however, is not immediately clear, and will likely depend on who first fills the role. Some countries want a high-profile figure to represent the EU on the world stage, while others propose a more low-key, bureaucratic figure. It is thought that Blair would insist that the new president be given broad authority to represent the EU in bodies such as the G8, the United Nations, and with foreign governments around the world.


Obviously the first person selected for the position will be very important in shaping whether the role is taken seriously or not, therefore many argue that a person with a well-known international profile and great charisma and experience should take the role. The problem is there are few people in Europe that match that description. Eurocrats in Brussels often suggest Luxembourg's prime minister Jean-Claude Juncker. But he is unknown outside Europe and even little-known in Europe itself. Or, the hyperactive and heavy-hitting President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso may decide to go for the job, although again he is not known outside Europe. Blair is thought to be the only politician with the international name recognition to pull it off, although Germany’s current chancellor Angela Merkel has also been suggested as a possibility if she loses reelection this year.


However Blair would face huge misgivings on the continent if he were to go for the job because of his collaboration in the Iraq War. And indeed, he could even face opposition in his own home country to the idea. An online petition against Mr Blair becoming president organised by the European Tribune group has attracted more than 2,900 petitions. The leader of France's Socialist Party, Francois Hollande, has said: "He has eminent qualities. He has had successes in his own country. But the position he took during the intervention in Iraq means that there is no doubt in my view that he cannot be the one to be the coming president of Europe."


In Blair’s own country Sir Malcolm Rifkind, British conservative foreign secretary from 1995 to 1997, told the BBC: "By his own standards, his [Mr Blair's] whole strategy on Europe failed miserably. He wants to be leader of Europe, but he was more responsible than anybody for dividing Europe over the Iraq war. He failed to get Britain into the single currency, I'm delighted to say…I would be astonished if the rest of Europe sees him as their natural spokesman." Of course for a Eurosceptic conservative like Malcolm, the real reason for him to be poo-pooing the idea may be that he fears Blair's presidency would lead to Britain's fuller integration into the EU.


Another thing working against Blair is that he’s from a large member State, which is bound to upset the other large member states (people from small states are considered to be more neutral). And though he pledged at the beginning of his administration to put Britain at the heart of Europe, after 9/11 he was so distracted by terrorism and the Iraq War that he completely failed on this endeavour. But he also has a lot going for him, including a high-profile international presence that could finally give the EU credibility.


Perhaps most importantly, having a native son in the highest position in the union could make Britain, the EU's most reluctant member, more enthusiastic about its membership.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
ryan
ryan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:22 on February 7th, 2008

Dave Keating, this would be a huge coup for Britain and Blair alike. Thanks for this informative and well written report.

Rob Peters
Rob Peters
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:24 on February 7th, 2008

Interesting possibility.  This is clear, well-sourced, and thought-provoking.  Thanks Dave.

Swan
Swan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:25 on February 7th, 2008

Hello Dave,

Your report was excellent in both content and presentation - I could almost hear your voice coming over the microphone, loud and clear. ;) 

Frankly, whether anyone has reservations against Blair or not - he's simply the man capable of doing the job and doing it well.  He has the knowledge, contacts, experience and guts to pull this off and set a precedent for how the job should be executed after his time.

Those that would complain about England's troops in Iraq, forget that he was fulfilling his duty as a loyal ally to the U.S.A.  How would Americans feel if we were being attacked and called upon England now to come to our aid - and they refused?

He made the same screw-up that Bush did, in leaving troops there for way too long - but that shouldn't condemn him as the man right for this job.
        ~ Swan

 

0
gerrypopplestone

 Interesting story.  Regardless of the error of his ways (!) in the past, I think he should get it.


Just one point, I think it's Malcom Rifkin you are mentioning in your piece.


 


Gerrypops

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

ryan
First Flagged at 3:22 PM, Feb 7, 2008 by ryan
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from