The Presidential Debate: Will Body Language Contribute to Who Wins or Loses?

by Rhonda J Mangus | September 26, 2008 at 02:39 pm
1151 views | 11 Recommendations | 16 comments

Videos

McCain debate in Mississippi - part 1

see larger video

sourced by Rhonda J Mangus

 McCain debate in Mississippi - part 1

Photos

The Presidential Debate: Will Body Language Contribute to Who Wins or Loses?

The Presidential Debate: Will Body Language Contribute to Who Wins or Loses?

see larger image

uploaded by Rhonda J Mangus

Body language is the non-verbal movements we make as part of how we communicate, and according to an article by Mike Cronin of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, body language used by the presidential candidates, Senator Barack Obama (D) and Senator John McCain (R), may spell out the victor in tonight's debate.


"But it's hard to make a prediction because tonight's format will be the first time it's ever been tried," Schroeder said.

What's different about this debate at the University of Mississippi in Oxford is that McCain and Obama will have five minutes to engage each other after answering each question posed by moderator Jim Lehrer of PBS.

"We don't have any historical guides to how candidates behave. It does mean how they treat each other becomes more important," Schroeder said.

McCain, the Republican nominee from Arizona, and Obama, the Democratic nominee from Illinois, will square off beginning at 9 p.m. for 90 minutes of verbal sparring on foreign policy and national security. Each will have a maximum of two minutes to respond to Lehrer's queries. The debate will be broadcast live on most major networks.

"Interactive actions could be uniquely important," said Gordon R. Mitchell, a University of Pittsburgh professor who focuses on the theory of argumentation and directs the William Pitt Debating Union. "With a five-minute free-for-all open discussion, repeated for 90 minutes, it's really going to be dramatic."

A possible Obama strategy could be purposely interrupting McCain to provoke his temper, Mitchell said. McCain, on the other hand, could bait Obama into appearing elitist with Reaganesque quips that diminish Obama's oratorical flair.

During a 1980 presidential debate, Ronald Reagan won favor by shaking his head and responding, "There you go again," to a point made by Jimmy Carter about Reagan's stance on Medicare.

But the ways candidates move mean much more than simply impressing the electorate during a debate, said Karen Kohn Bradley, a public-speaking coach and dance professor at the University of Maryland. She has studied politicians' body language since 2002.

"Those behaviors reveal their attitudes toward making decisions, how well they work with others, if they're solitary or independent thinkers or if they consult others," Bradley said.

She wonders what style each candidate will adopt during the debate. Bradley said both nominees recently have changed their physical demeanors -- which, depending on voters' preferences, could be viewed as positive or negative.

McCain, for example, conveyed himself as a highly stable candidate throughout the primary season by doing things such as taking a wide, grounded stance and gripping the sides of the podium.

"Now, he's gotten into swaying in the wind a little bit and looking around, which makes him look more equivocal," she said. "I don't know if this is making his supporters nervous or not. Voters drawn to him for his solidness might be concerned."

Until recently, Obama "wandered" while on a dais and "stared off into distances" while other people spoke.

"Some people interpreted that as attuning and listening to those around him," Bradley said. "Others saw it as he doesn't have a position. Well, we've seen that change. Now, he takes a stand. That could make his supporters very nervous. Now that they know where he stands and they may not agree with him."

The most crucial strategy is to radiate confidence, calm and strength, said David Lanoue, an expert on presidential debates who chairs the political science department at the University of Alabama.

"Do the things your mother always told you to do," Lanoue said. "Be as natural as possible. Stand up straight. Look at the people you're talking to -- in this case, the American people.



recommend This comment thread is now closed
Fairbanks
Fairbanks
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:53 on September 26th, 2008

Anything on Sen Kennedy taken to the hospital just now?

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Fairbanks, thank you for the Flag. I think your question might be better addressed here.

Amitjha
Amitjha
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 21:54 on September 26th, 2008

Rhonda J Mangus, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Thank you for reading and for the Flag, Amitjha.

SOLARLIFE
SOLARLIFE
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 02:07 on September 27th, 2008

Rhonda J Mangus, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

SOLARLIFE, thank you:).

Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:55 on September 27th, 2008

Rhonda J Mangus, I like this story. It's good stuff.

I was not impressed with either candidates at all, There Know how and knowledge of facts and there lack of objectivity and sense of reality is very disturbing and worrying even though Obama was somewhat better then McCain both are in my view real clowns and neither should be elected President of the USA. It may be wise to look for a third candidate right about now.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Paschen, thank you for sharing your thoughts and for the Flag. It is my understanding that Senator Obama fared much better than Senator McCain in last night's Debate. I also think that our presidential candidates are lacking a certain class in many respects, and that should be an embarrassment to the American people, in and of itself. Any suggestions for a third candidate:)?

0
Paschen

Collin Powel or Elenor Eisenhower, Why not you Rhonda? I am 100% sure that you be better then those 4 candidates Running.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Paschen, interesting picks, and you are too kind:)! Thank you for the vote of confidence:). Unfortunately, we have to deal with what we have at the moment. We can only hope for the best possible outcome. Whatever that may be:)

0
Paschen

What about Ralph Nadder? Is he not running?

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Paschen, Mr. Nader is running as an Independent, here. Without doing a search, perhaps a story on Mr. Nader is in order to see how he shores up with Senators Obama and McCain, and whether or not he could actually win the November election.

0
Paschen

Thank would be nice, He needs some coverage. Why are not all candidates part of the debate any way?

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Hi Paschen. Simply put, Mr. Nader (and Mr. Barr) were not invited, although both offered to stand in for Senator McCain in the event he would not proceed. You might want to read LATimes, Top Of The Ticket "Ralph Nader weighs in on the debate (you know, the one he wasn't invited to)", here.


0
joand

McCain seemed intimidated by his refusal to look at Obama.  Obama listened to McCain and  in my opinion won the debate.  Body language was very revealing !

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Hi joand! Thank you for commenting. It seems most people think Senator Obama was the "victor". I'm pleased you noticed body language. It is usually very revealing. Thanks again.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from