PRINCESS DIANA INQUEST DRAWS TO A CLOSE AFTER AL FAYED’S JUDICIAL REVIEW IS TURNED DOWN

The Princess Diana Inquest has drawn to a close with Mohamed Al Fayed’s bid to make the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh give evidence at the Diana inquest rejected by the High Court. There was little chance of his judicial review application succeeding given the fact that the so-called ‘impartial’ coroner had already blocked moves to make the Queen and Prince Philip testify.

Al Fayed’s legal team tried to get a judicial review of the ‘decision’ earlier this month that the Royal couple need not attend the Inquest. The application was rejected before the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Sir Igor Judge, Mr Justice Walker and Mr Justice Cross. ‘Sir’ Igor said: “This application should be refused.”

And in a dramatic twist in another part of London’s Royal Courts of Justice, Mr Al Fayed was summoned back to the witness box at the Inquest to make it clear that he was wrong when he had earlier told the jury that he had won a decision in another court case. Clearly, the coroner who opened the Inquest by telling the jury that the ring Dodi bought for Diana was not for an engagement in his view, needed to clear up a few loose ends before he begins his week-long summing up to the jury he has already tried to guide against the Al Fayed camp.

Establishment puppet Scott-Baker

At the very outset of the Inquest in October last year Scott-Baker told the jury that he was not convinced that Diana and Dodi’s relationship was ‘genuine’ and he questioned the engagement ring actually being for an ‘engagement’. With his clear opinions expressed to the jury he had inadvertently admitted he was not impartial. It will be interesting to see the extent to which he may try to guide the jury towards a verdict of ‘accidental’ death because anything else will be a disaster for the British Monarchy.

Lord ‘Justice’ Scott-Baker is a lifelong supporter of the Establishment and a career parasite on the public purse from which he has made a small fortune. Any chance of his being impartial in his summing disappeared at the Inquest’s opening in October last year. And throughout he has demonstrated bias against the Al Fayed camp, demanding an apology from John McNamara for the serial liar Trevor Rees-Jones or Trevor Rees as he now calls himself.

Indeed Trevor Rees has changed his story so many times it is extremely difficult to understand on what grounds he deserves an apology of any description. In March 1998 he said that Henri Paul was not drunk and that he would not have allowed Paul to drive if he suspected the acting head of Hotel Ritz Paris security was drunk. But at the Inquest Trevor Rees again changed his tune and his new ’story/fable’ was ‘Henri Paul was drunk and it was all just a terrible accident’ which is pretty good going for a man who claims he cannot remember exactly what happened on 30/31 August 1997.

Rees-Jones spills the beans to the Daily Mirror, March 1998

And even more importantly was the confession of self-confessed liar Paul Burrell who admitted he lied to the Inquest and that Scott-Baker “still allowed me to get away with it.” The reason for this is Scott-Baker did not want to encourage Burrell to say too much about what he really knows regarding the Queen’s admission of “dark forces” at work in Britain.

The fact that the coroner had no power to summon Burrell back to the Inquest to ‘explain’ himself was a factor configured into the plans of the ‘people’ who protect Burrell, while he stays quiet about certain matters. For Burrell knows only too well what might happen to him if he does not stay silent and the firebomb attack on his Cheshire flower shop was a mere warning of what could follow….

So Burrell stays tucked away in the United States where he is safe from the British people who hate him and know him to be a traitor and serial liar, a misfit of the imagination for which he is so renowned. Not that this matters to the stupid Americans who buy into his fairy tales, no pun intended on his bi-sexuality, and spend large sums of money on his Royal Butler ‘collections’. It seems that at last in the land of make-believe Burrell has found his true home….

And Lord ‘Justice’ Scott-Baker allowed him to get away with it and this fact demonstrates exactly where both ‘men’ stand in relation to each other, the Monarchy and the result they are striving to achieve. History will not forget nor forgive them, the more so if the verdict is death by misadventure or most likely ‘open verdict’?

No Comments »