NP Rank:
Prop 8 sponsors will not have to show records, panel says
SAN FRANCISCO—The sponsors of Proposition 8 - California's gay marriage ban - will not be required to turn over internal campaign documents and memos within the lawsuit which is looking to overturn Proposition 8, a panel from a Federals Appeals court has decided.
Reversing the decision of the judge presiding over the case, a three-judge panel from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that forcing sponsors and backers of the voter-approved ban to reveal their private conversations and internal strategy would discourage like-minded people from working together to advance their political views and that this constitutes a violation of First Amendment rights.
"The freedom to associate with others for the common advancement of political beliefs and ideas lies at the heart of the First Amendment," Judge Raymond C. Fisher wrote for the panel.Attorneys for the two same-sex couples who are trying to get Proposition 8 overturned as a violation of their civil rights have been seeking the information in preparation for the trial, which is scheduled to begin Jan. 11. They are trying to prove that bias against gays and lesbians alone motivated the ballot initiative's supporters to put it before voters.
The 9th Circuit decision means that to prove their point, the couples' attorneys will need to rely almost exclusively on published materials from last year's campaign and interviews with the main players behind the ban.
Yusef Robb, a spokesman for the American Foundation for Equal Rights, a Los Angeles-based group spearheading the lawsuit, hat lawyers still would have plenty of ammunition to show that the ban unlawfully discriminates against gays.
"We are ready to proceed on January 11 with an overwhelming case against Prop. 8 that is based on a multitude of documents, witness testimony and the U.S. Constitution," Robb said.
Andy Pugno, a lawyer for Protect Marriage, the coalition of religious and social conservative groups that sponsored the measure, said the ruling proved that Proposition 8's sponsors were correct in fighting to protect the identities of prominent backers and the keys to their winning strategy.
"It's a fundamental feature of our system that citizens have a right to participate in campaigns without later being put on trial for their political beliefs," Pugno said.
He said the campaign would furnish the other side with literature and appeals that were sent to voters, "but we've drawn the line with internal discussions and strategizing."
Friday's ruling came in response to a pair of decisions by U.S. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker, who overruled the objections of Protect Marriage and ordered the group's attorneys to give opposing lawyers e-mails, strategy memos and other information exchanged by the campaign's leaders.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
ari
San Francisco, California, United States -
rawrrmeagan
United States
Recommendations (26)
-
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
stejeb
United Kingdom -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States








Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 06:17 on December 12th, 2009
"It's a fundamental feature of our system that citizens have a right to participate in campaigns without later being put on trial for their political beliefs," Pugno said.
One pandora's box we do not want opened, is giving the government the right to pry into how our political ideas and strategies are formed.
Next up, the PC police will be able to come after any person or persons that oppose them.
The revolution draws nearer.
at 07:20 on December 12th, 2009
"We are ready to proceed on January 11 with an overwhelming case against Prop. 8 that is based on a multitude of documents, witness testimony and the U.S. Constitution," Robb said."
So if the gay crowd's lawyer says that, it is kinda sorta an admission that the remainder was in fact a witch hunt. Pathetic fits, i'm thinking.