Proposition 8 Backers: 'Gays have political power', court hears

by Susan Marie Kovalinsky | January 26, 2010 at 07:24 am
139 views | 4 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Loading photos...

HISTORIC FEDERAL TRIAL HEADS INTO HOME STRETCH:  Gays have 'power',  Prop 8 Backers say;  Recap of Day 10 from Gayapolis

The influence of gays within cultural and political domains of the United States is significant and growing,  according to the testimony of a college professor who gave his testimony on Monday. 

"An upward trajectory of power"?

The historic federal trial which will decide if Proposition 8,  the state of California's ballot measure which put a ban on gay marriage,  voted in by 7 million state residents,  is in violation of the US Constitution,  is closing with arguments from defenders of the measure.  

A political scientist testified Monday  that gays and lesbians enjoy wide support from the Democratic party, unions and many corporations, as do other minorities, including African Americans.

A professor at  Claremont McKenna College,  Kenneth P Miller  was the first witness called by defenders of Proposition 8, the 2008 . 

In his testimony,  the professor stated that the  Democratic Party in California was on record in support of the repeal of Proposition 8. 

The  California Teachers Assn. contributed $1.3 million to defeat the marriage ban and that leading industries in Silicon Valley also participated in efforts to defeat Proposition 8:  These facts were also revealed as the professor continued his testimony.  

In his ongoing testimony,  Miller also held forth for the court the idea that Proposition 8 is a measure to protect traditional marriage, and in no way reflect's hatred of gays.  Indeed,  he argued that it is the exception which proves the rule;  citing many of California's measures for the expanded protection and endowment of homosexuals.  

Perhaps most important was Miller's statement reminding the court that three past ballot initiatives opposed by gays and lesbians, including one that would have subjected those who were infected with HIV to quarantine, have failed overwhelmingly.

On cross examination attorney David Boise asked Miller if many of the initiatives which protect gays also protect other minorities,  which Miller gave his assent to.  What difference that would make remains unclear.  

Boies asked Miller for examples of official discrimination against gays. Miller mentioned the federal law banning openly gay people in the military.

Under further questioning, Miller cited a federal law that defines marriage as an opposite-sex relationship and California's marriage ban that was enacted as Proposition 8.

"Looking at the institution of marriage, the state does treat heterosexual couples differently than same-sex couples," Miller said.

Today was another exciting day as the Prop 8 trial heads into the home stretch. The plaintiffs finished their case today, and defendants got started with their first witness, Professor Kenneth Miller.
The plaintiffs' attorneys closed their case by playing excerpts from two simulcasts that were broadcast to gatherings of evangelical voters during the Prop 8 campaign. These simulcasts were sponsored and paid for by ProtectMarriage.com, the official Yes on 8 campaign organization. In the portions shown, one speaker said, "The polygamists are waiting in the wings, because if a man can marry a man and a woman can marry a woman, the polygamists are going to use that exact same argument and they probably are going to win." Another speaker referred to a man marrying a horse, and a third speaker compared the impact of permitting same-sex couples to marry to the 9/11 attacks.

The videos of these outrageous statements, made in a forum sponsored and paid for by the official Yes on 8 campaign, provided a fitting end to the plaintiffs' case. It brought the focus back to the long history of demonization the LGBT community has faced in the public sphere - from the grim historical events described in Professor George Chauncey's testimony two weeks ago to the themes of the Yes on 8 campaign, as shown in today's videos and the highly inflammatory testimony of Prop 8 proponent Dr. Bill Tam. The plaintiffs have done an admirable job of laying out the case that Prop 8 was a product of the same kind of prejudice that has driven many other anti-gay laws throughout our nation's history.
Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
Hugh Askew

"Looking at the institution of marriage, the state does treat heterosexual couples differently than same-sex couples," Miller said.

No, only married couples get treated differently. Marriage entails a "male" and a "female" - per its very definition.

A homosexual couple might be a couple, and they might play roles as a couple, but they certainly aren't "male" and "female", else they wouldn't be homosexuals.


closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from