The protracted death of the Grand Old Party

by smkovalinsky | October 29, 2009 at 09:38 am
77 views | 4 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

The protracted death of the Grand Old Party

The protracted death of the Grand Old Party

see larger image

uploaded by smkovalinsky

And now I say,  "I die,  I die" 

so to a strong bushel let us now it  tie

The Huffington Post is by no means the first or only publication to notice that the Grand Old Party is dying a slow death. 

The fact that they had from 2004-08 to find a suitable presidential candidate,  and could not,  speaks volumes.  It was impossible to unify republicans in this last presidential race.  Obama's victory was assured on that point.  McCain was running against history itself:  The history of the death of political parties.  

A Social Conservative Tea Party will likely replace the GOP.  Of that we can be more than certain:  It will take into its fold libertarians and independents and every sort of Beckian indoctrinated youth.  

The GOP is going the way of the Whig Party:  It is outgrowing its own premises.  

Diamond urges the party to "embrace science and evolution".   It is not likely that such urgings were not given to it long ago,  and the Tea Party continues to be content to split its vote. 

 Some from the Orange County district in  California made an astute remark:  "The GOP is not dead,  but undead.  It wanders about like a hungry zombie,  not realizing it perished long ago.".  That is about the size of it for most people.  On Jon Stewart's Daily Show just after Obama was elected,  they had an hilarious skit in which a feeble,  geriatric man of about 95,  did a rap song,  wearing a big Abe Lincoln hat and wearing GOP bling,  he feebly rapped out,  ain't no party like the Grand Ol Party,  let's pop a cap in the death tax  before collapsing and going into cardiac arrest. 

"The name of the aggressive and virulent upstart Party that is trying to push its Republican patriarch into an early grave is unclear--call it a re-energized national Conservative Party, a Social-Conservative Party or maybe even the "Tea Party" (the revolutionary-era moniker it seems to prefer). While the label may be in question, its faces are not."  ~  Rob Diamond,  Huffington Post 10/29/09

Nowhere is it written that major political parties will live forever. In fact, over the course of the first 100 years of our country's history, Americans saw the rise and fall of numerous nationally powerful political parties. The Federalists and Democratic-Republicans ruled the day in the late 18th and early 19th century. By the 1850's it was the Whig Party and the Democratic Party battling for national political supremacy. The Whigs would ultimately be destroyed in 1856 by the question of whether to allow the expansion of slavery into the territories of the West. That gave rise to the Republican Party and henceforth the major two-party system that has dominated American politics for the past 153 years.

We are witnessing today, however, an unmistakable emergence of deep fissures within the Republican Party. These are serious indications of a momentous, generational shift underway in the American political landscape not seen in almost a century. It begs the question, are we watching the beginning of the end of the Republican Party--the long, slow death of the GOP?

The name of the aggressive and virulent upstart Party that is trying to push its Republican patriarch into an early grave is unclear--call it a re-energized national Conservative Party, a Social-Conservative Party or maybe even the "Tea Party" (the revolutionary-era moniker it seems to prefer). While the label may be in question, its faces are not. This is the Party of Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Dick Cheney, Dick Armey, Glenn Beck, Grover Norquist, Michelle Bachmann and Mike Huckabee (just to name a few--yes, I left out Chuck Norris). They have launched a nationwide political insurrection--on the ground and in the airwaves--that is inflicting serious injury to the party of Lincoln, Reagan and George H.W. Bush.

Don't believe me? Just look at what is taking place today in New York's 23rd Congressional District. What should have been a low-visibility, off-cycle special election to fill a vacant Congressional seat has erupted into full-fledged Republican civil warfare--with serious national implications for the future of the GOP.

Apoplectic that local Republican Party leaders had nominated as their candidate a socially-moderate state legislator by the name of Dede Scozzafava (she supports abortion rights, gay rights and has ties to organized labor), local Conservatives revolted and ran a candidate of their own--Doug Hoffman. Sensing the moment and the terrain were ripe to make their stand, the national Tea Party masters declared open warfare on Scozzafava, if only to use her as a proxy in what looks more like an insurrection against the pillars of the Republican Party.

The Tea Party has filtered millions of dollars in donations to the Hoffman campaign through organizations like the Club for Growth. Glenn Beck has hosted Doug Hoffman live in the studio.



Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rob-diamond/present-at-the-cremation_b_338601.html

recommend Add a comment
1
Rory Cripps

HA! I understand why people believe that the Republican party is on its last legs. Indeed, there wasn't very much hope and change for them in the last election. But a lot of this will depend upon how Obama does over the next few years and how the 2010 congressional races turn out. Right now, it doesn't look good for Obama, but that can all change before 2010. The Democrats need to keep their fingers crossed that things pick up and the Republicans need to come up with a new game plan. The 2010 elections should prove interesting and maybe even fun to watch!

1
a211423

A Social Conservative Tea Party will likely replace the GOP

Great observations smk!

The GOP might be evolving to mirror Goldwater and his platform against the New Deal politics that  rallied support for a return to the American Conservative movement, which played a part in the emergence of the Libertarian Party.  When he lost to Johnson in 1964, the Republicans found a leader in Reagan first as guv of California and then president.  These party fluctuations need a strong central character or hero to rally around.  I think the Republicans thought it was McCain, but we know how that turned out. 

The question is who will be the leader of the next Republican evolution? 

1
smkovalinsky

Thanks as always, A!Yes,  the GOP lucked out in 2000 and 2004 (more or less)  with the charismatic W Bush (at least they found him so).  But they had from 2004-08 to find a good unifying candidate, and they just could not do it:  Huckabee,  Guliani, Romney,  it was all split between these types.  Yes,  indeed:  Who will lead them? 

0
Rory Cripps

SMK: JEEZ! If there's anyone out there (Republicans included) that found Bush to be "charismatic", then they need a check-up from the neck-up! lol!

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rory Cripps
First Flagged at 4:52 PM, Nov 1, 2009 by Rory Cripps
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (4)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from